IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v4y2019i1d10.1186_s41072-019-0044-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Container barge congestion and handling in large seaports: a theoretical agent-based modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Shobayo

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Edwin van Hassel

    (University of Antwerp)

Abstract

Container Barging forms an important mode of transportation especially in large seaports with a strong inland waterway connectivity. This is because it is Cost-efficient and environmental friendly compared to the other modes of transportation. Despite the significant importance, container barge transportation is faced with several challenges and inefficiencies. One of these challenges is the large waiting time of barges in large container seaports which has negatively impacted the reliability of barge transportation. It is due to these challenges that this study seeks to examine the reasons for barge congestion and poor handling to propose possible solutions to these problems. In achieving these objectives, a quantitative methodological approach was adopted for the study in which agent-based modelling was developed to analyze the different scenarios developed in the study. An impact assessment of each of the different scenarios was conducted to identify the most suitable that would address congestion and handling issues around container barging. The study concluded that the presence of sea vessels and the high priority given to these vessels are major causes of barge congestion in large seaports, hence the study recommends dedicated barge berthing spaces at each terminal. Appropriate smaller cranes should also be invested in, to enhance the handling of the barges.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Shobayo & Edwin van Hassel, 2019. "Container barge congestion and handling in large seaports: a theoretical agent-based modeling approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:4:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-019-0044-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-019-0044-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-019-0044-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-019-0044-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baindur, Deepak & Viegas, José Manuel, 2011. "An agent based model concept for assessing modal share in inter-regional freight transport markets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1093-1105.
    2. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2012. "Congestion, port expansion and spatial competition for US container imports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1121-1136.
    3. Caris, A. & Macharis, C. & Janssens, G.K., 2011. "Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 125-133.
    4. Qi Fu & Liming Liu & Zhou Xu, 2010. "Port resources rationalization for better container barge services in Hong Kong," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 543-561, November.
    5. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    6. Visser, Johan & Konings, Rob & Wiegmans, Bart & Pielage, Ben-Jaap, 2007. "A new hinterland transport concept for the port of Rotterdam: organisational and/or technological challenges?," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207936, Transportation Research Forum.
    7. Konings, Rob & Kreutzberger, Ekki & Maraš, Vladislav, 2013. "Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: the case of the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 63-73.
    8. Petering, Matthew E.H., 2011. "Decision support for yard capacity, fleet composition, truck substitutability, and scalability issues at seaport container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 85-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Mazloumi & Edwin van Hassel, 2021. "Improvement of Container Terminal Productivity with Knowledge about Future Transport Modes: A Theoretical Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Claudio Quintano & Paolo Mazzocchi & Antonella Rocca, 2020. "A competitive analysis of EU ports by fixing spatial and economic dimensions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Riccardo Giusti & Daniele Manerba & Roberto Tadei, 2021. "Smart Steaming: A New Flexible Paradigm for Synchromodal Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.
    2. Qiu, Xuan & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan, 2021. "Pricing and scheduling of barge hinterland transportation service for inbound containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    4. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    6. Wiercx, Max & van Kalmthout, Martijn & Wiegmans, Bart, 2019. "Inland waterway terminal yard configuration contributing to sustainability: Modeling yard operations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 4-16.
    7. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.
    8. Patricio Gallardo & Rua Murray & Susan Krumdieck, 2021. "A Sequential Optimization-Simulation Approach for Planning the Transition to the Low Carbon Freight System with Case Study in the North Island of New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    10. Zhang, Rong & Jian, Wenliang & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2018. "Estimation of network level benefits of reliability improvements in intermodal freight transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-8.
    11. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    12. Piotr Durajczyk & Natalia Drop, 2021. "Possibilities of Using Inland Navigation to Improve Efficiency of Urban and Interurban Freight Transport with the Use of the River Information Services (RIS) System—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Marianne Fischman & Emeric Lendjel, 2012. "Maritime Ports And Inland Interconnections: A Transactional Analysis Of Container Barge Transport In France," Post-Print halshs-00741127, HAL.
    14. Konings, Rob & Kreutzberger, Ekki & Maraš, Vladislav, 2013. "Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: the case of the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 63-73.
    15. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Kai & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Tug scheduling for hinterland barge transport: A branch-and-price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 119-132.
    16. Marianne Fischman & Emeric Lendjel, 2012. "Maritime Ports And Inland Interconnections: A Transactional Analysis Of Container Barge Transport In France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00741127, HAL.
    17. Matthew E. H. Petering & Yong Wu & Wenkai Li & Mark Goh & Robert Souza & Katta G. Murty, 2017. "Real-time container storage location assignment at a seaport container transshipment terminal: dispersion levels, yard templates, and sensitivity analyses," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 369-402, December.
    18. Ryuichi Shibasaki & Takayuki Iijima & Taiji Kawakami & Takashi Kadono & Tatsuyuki Shishido, 2017. "Network assignment model of integrating maritime and hinterland container shipping: application to Central America," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 234-273, June.
    19. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    20. Paraskevopoulos, Dimitris C. & Gürel, Sinan & Bektaş, Tolga, 2016. "The congested multicommodity network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 166-187.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:4:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-019-0044-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.