IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v155y2012i3d10.1007_s10957-012-0093-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibria of the Games in Choice Form

Author

Listed:
  • Anton Stefanescu

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Massimiliano Ferrara

    (University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria)

  • Maria Viorica Stefanescu

    (Academy of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Equilibrium in choice is a solution-concept for noncooperative games defined in a general framework—the game in choice form. There are two leading ideas of the new definition. One is that the players’ preferences need not be explicitly represented, but earlier accepted solution concepts should be formally derived as particular cases. Secondly, the choice of a player need not be a best reply to the strategy combination of the others, if the choices of the other players are motivated for themselves and a best reply does not exist. It is shown that in the present framework are included classical models of game theory, and the new concept extends various known noncooperative solutions. The main technical results of the paper concern the existence of the equilibrium in choice. As particular cases, known results on the existence of classical solutions are found. Thus, our approach can be also seen as a general method for proving the existence of different solutions for noncooperative games.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton Stefanescu & Massimiliano Ferrara & Maria Viorica Stefanescu, 2012. "Equilibria of the Games in Choice Form," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 1060-1072, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:155:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-012-0093-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-012-0093-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-012-0093-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-012-0093-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Kok-Keong & Yu, Jian & Yuan, Xian-Zhi, 1995. "Existence Theorems of Nash Equilibria for Non-cooperative N-Person Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 24(3), pages 217-222.
    2. Shafer, Wayne & Sonnenschein, Hugo, 1975. "Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 345-348, December.
    3. Stefanescu, Anton & Ferrara, Massimiliano, 2006. "Implementation of voting operators," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 315-324, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Patriche, 2017. "Existence of the Equilibrium in Choice," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 158-171, October.
    2. Carlos Hervés-Beloso & Monica Patriche, 2014. "A Fixed-Point Theorem and Equilibria of Abstract Economies with Weakly Upper Semicontinuous Set-Valued Maps," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 719-736, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mich Tvede & Hervé Crès, 2001. "Voting in Assemblies of shareholders and Incomplete Markets," SciencePo Working papers hal-01064884, HAL.
    2. Philippe Bich & Rida Laraki, 2017. "Externalities in Economies with Endogenous Sharing Rules," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01437507, HAL.
    3. Ghosal, Sayantan & Dalton, Patricio, 2013. "Characterizing Behavioral Decisions with Choice Data," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 107, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Tian, Guoqiang, 1991. "Implementation of the Walrasian Correspondence without Continuous, Convex, and Ordered Preferences," MPRA Paper 41298, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Monica Patriche, 2013. "Fixed Point and Equilibrium Theorems in a Generalized Convexity Framework," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 701-715, March.
    6. Alcantud, Jose C.R., 2006. "Maximality with or without binariness: Transfer-type characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 182-191, March.
    7. Philippe Bich & Rida Laraki, 2017. "Externalities in Economies with Endogenous Sharing Rules," Post-Print halshs-01437507, HAL.
    8. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanık, 2021. "Topological connectedness and behavioral assumptions on preferences: a two-way relationship," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 411-460, March.
    9. Juho Kokkala & Kimmo Berg & Kai Virtanen & Jirka Poropudas, 2019. "Rationalizable strategies in games with incomplete preferences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 185-204, March.
    10. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 647, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/10283 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Hervé Crès & Mich Tvede, 2013. "Production externalities: internalization by voting," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 53(2), pages 403-424, June.
    13. Bernard Cornet & Mihaela Topuzu, 2005. "Existence of equilibria for economies with externalities and a measure space of consumers," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 26(2), pages 397-421, August.
    14. Hans Gersbach & Hans Haller & Hideo Konishi, 2015. "Household formation and markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(3), pages 461-507, August.
    15. Kirill Borissov, 2013. "The Existence of Equilibrium Paths in an AK-model with Endogenous Time Preferences and Borrowing Constraints," EUSP Department of Economics Working Paper Series Ec-01/13, European University at St. Petersburg, Department of Economics.
    16. Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Xian, 2021. "A weak α-core existence theorem of games with nonordered preferences and a continuum of agents," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Senda Ounaies & Jean-Marc Bonnisseau & Souhail Chebbi, 2016. "Equilibrium of a production economy with noncompact attainable allocations set," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16056r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Oct 2017.
    18. Noguchi, Mitsunori, 1997. "Economies with a continuum of consumers, a continuum of suppliers and an infinite dimensional commodity space," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Jacques Dreze, 2016. "Existence and multiplicity of temporary equilibria under nominal price rigidities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 279-298, June.
    20. Yang, Zhe & Yuan, George Xianzhi, 2019. "Some generalizations of Zhao’s theorem: Hybrid solutions and weak hybrid solutions for games with nonordered preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 94-100.
    21. Trockel, Walter & Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2017. "Thoughts on social design," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 577, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:155:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-012-0093-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.