IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i2d10.1007_s10845-016-1268-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A joint particle filter and expectation maximization approach to machine condition prognosis

Author

Listed:
  • Jinjiang Wang

    (China University of Petroleum)

  • Robert X. Gao

    (Case Western Reserve University)

  • Zhuang Yuan

    (China University of Petroleum)

  • Zhaoyan Fan

    (Oregon State University)

  • Laibin Zhang

    (China University of Petroleum)

Abstract

This paper presents a probabilistic model based approach for machinery condition prognosis based on particle filter by integrating physical knowledge with in-process measurements into a state space framework to account for uncertainty and nonlinearity in machinery degradation process. One limitation of conventional particle filter is that condition prognosis is performed based on the model with predetermined parameters obtained from simulation studies or lab-controlled tests. Due to the stochastic nature of machinery defect propagation under varying operating conditions, model parameters may vary in practice which causes prediction errors. To address it, an integrated state prediction and parameter estimation framework based on particle filter and expectation-maximization algorithm is formulated and investigated. The model parameters are adaptively estimated based on expectation-maximization algorithm utilizing hidden degradation state and available in-process measurements. Particle filter is then performed on the identified model with estimated parameters following Bayesian inference scheme to improve the robustness and accuracy of machinery condition prognosis. The effectiveness of the developed method is demonstrated through a simulation study and an experimental run-to-failure bearing test in a wind turbine.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinjiang Wang & Robert X. Gao & Zhuang Yuan & Zhaoyan Fan & Laibin Zhang, 2019. "A joint particle filter and expectation maximization approach to machine condition prognosis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 605-621, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1268-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1268-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-016-1268-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-016-1268-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zio, Enrico & Peloni, Giovanni, 2011. "Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 403-409.
    2. An, Dawn & Choi, Joo-Ho & Kim, Nam Ho, 2013. "Prognostics 101: A tutorial for particle filter-based prognostics algorithm using Matlab," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 161-169.
    3. Mkhadri, Abdallah, 1998. "On the rate of convergence of the ECME algorithm," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 81-87, January.
    4. Michael Basin & Alexander Loukianov & Miguel Hernandez-Gonzalez, 2013. "Joint state and parameter estimation for uncertain stochastic nonlinear polynomial systems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 1200-1208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Barbieri & Khan T. P. Nguyen & Roberto Diversi & Kamal Medjaher & Andrea Tilli, 2021. "RUL prediction for automatic machines: a mixed edge-cloud solution based on model-of-signals and particle filtering techniques," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1421-1440, June.
    2. Han Cheng & Xianguang Kong & Qibin Wang & Hongbo Ma & Shengkang Yang & Gaige Chen, 2023. "Deep transfer learning based on dynamic domain adaptation for remaining useful life prediction under different working conditions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 587-613, February.
    3. Li, Guofa & Wei, Jingfeng & He, Jialong & Yang, Haiji & Meng, Fanning, 2023. "Implicit Kalman filtering method for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearing with adaptive detection of degradation stage transition point," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Saideep Nannapaneni & Sankaran Mahadevan & Abhishek Dubey & Yung-Tsun Tina Lee, 2021. "Online monitoring and control of a cyber-physical manufacturing process under uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1289-1304, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    2. Pradeep Kundu & Makarand S.Kulkarni & Ashish K.Darpe, 2023. "A hybrid prognosis approach for life prediction of gears subjected to progressive pitting failure mode," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1325-1346, March.
    3. Wei Teng & Xiaolong Zhang & Yibing Liu & Andrew Kusiak & Zhiyong Ma, 2016. "Prognosis of the Remaining Useful Life of Bearings in a Wind Turbine Gearbox," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    5. Wang, Yiwei & Gogu, Christian & Kim, Nam H. & Haftka, Raphael T. & Binaud, Nicolas & Bes, Christian, 2019. "Noise-dependent ranking of prognostics algorithms based on discrepancy without true damage information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 86-100.
    6. Wang, Hai-Kun & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Jin, Tongdan, 2017. "Near-extreme system condition and near-extreme remaining useful time for a group of products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 103-110.
    7. Faisal Khan & Omer F. Eker & Atif Khan & Wasim Orfali, 2018. "Adaptive Degradation Prognostic Reasoning by Particle Filter with a Neural Network Degradation Model for Turbofan Jet Engine," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Chen, Jian & Yuan, Shenfang & Sbarufatti, Claudio & Jin, Xin, 2021. "Dual crack growth prognosis by using a mixture proposal particle filter and on-line crack monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    10. Chen, Zhelun & O’Neill, Zheng & Wen, Jin & Pradhan, Ojas & Yang, Tao & Lu, Xing & Lin, Guanjing & Miyata, Shohei & Lee, Seungjae & Shen, Chou & Chiosa, Roberto & Piscitelli, Marco Savino & Capozzoli, , 2023. "A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnostics for building HVAC systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    11. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Merainani, Boualem & Laddada, Sofiane & Bechhoefer, Eric & Chikh, Mohamed Abdessamed Ait & Benazzouz, Djamel, 2022. "An integrated methodology for estimating the remaining useful life of high-speed wind turbine shaft bearings with limited samples," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1141-1151.
    14. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Du, Dang-Bo & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Chen, 2020. "A novel iterative approach of lifetime estimation for standby systems with deteriorating spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Le Son, Khanh & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoît, 2013. "Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 165-175.
    17. Fang, Xiaolei & Zhou, Rensheng & Gebraeel, Nagi, 2015. "An adaptive functional regression-based prognostic model for applications with missing data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 266-274.
    18. Yawei Hu & Shujie Liu & Huitian Lu & Hongchao Zhang, 2018. "Online remaining useful life prognostics using an integrated particle filter," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 587-597, December.
    19. Fan, Jiajie & Yung, Kam-Chuen & Pecht, Michael, 2014. "Prognostics of lumen maintenance for High power white light emitting diodes using a nonlinear filter-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 63-72.
    20. Mishra, Madhav & Martinsson, Jesper & Rantatalo, Matti & Goebel, Kai, 2018. "Bayesian hierarchical model-based prognostics for lithium-ion batteries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 25-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1268-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.