IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v28y2017i7d10.1007_s10845-015-1170-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary fuzzy intelligent system for multi-objective supply chain network designs: an agent-based optimization state of the art

Author

Listed:
  • Mosahar Tarimoradi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • M. H. Fazel Zarandi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology
    University of Toronto)

  • Hosain Zaman

    (HEC Montréal)

  • I. B. Turksan

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

Supply chain network designing and programming is a momentous issue that many practitioners have focused on and contributed numerous novelties for this prompt. This paper puts forward a fuzzy multi-agent system according to which compatible with the decision makers’ interests and environmental survey, identifies the parameters of the mathematical model. An embedded optimization party including evolutionary-based optimizer intelligent agents, obtains non-dominated potential solutions. The output of these optimizer agents during the calibration process is an underpinning for evaluating the performance of the party. The system makes the policy of optimization complying with the results evaluation as well as the decision makers’ elaborated desires. Afterwards, in step with this policy, it sets a pool from obtained Pareto Fronts and aggregates them to extract a set of the best individuals. It interactively represents this set to the decision makers and catches their desired circumstance amongst these optional solutions. Proposing the network graph and program—which its generic morphography is determined—for decision makers is contrived as the system last stage. The main competencies of this system could be contemplated regarding the facts that it interactively fulfills the decision makers’ utilities relying on its robustness in optimization, self-tuning, training loop, ambient intelligence and consciousness toward the changes in environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mosahar Tarimoradi & M. H. Fazel Zarandi & Hosain Zaman & I. B. Turksan, 2017. "Evolutionary fuzzy intelligent system for multi-objective supply chain network designs: an agent-based optimization state of the art," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1551-1579, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1170-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1170-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1170-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1170-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hadavandi, Esmaeil & Ghanbari, Arash & Shahanaghi, Kamran & Abbasian-Naghneh, Salman, 2011. "Tourist arrival forecasting by evolutionary fuzzy systems," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1196-1203.
    2. Gebennini, Elisa & Gamberini, Rita & Manzini, Riccardo, 2009. "An integrated production-distribution model for the dynamic location and allocation problem with safety stock optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 286-304, November.
    3. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    4. Jonas Yu & Yu-Siang Lin & Kung-Jeng Wang, 2013. "Coordination-based inventory management for deteriorating items in a two-echelon supply chain with profit sharing," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1587-1601.
    5. Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Collette Coullard & Mark S. Daskin, 2003. "A Joint Location-Inventory Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 40-55, February.
    6. Sauvageau, Gabriel & Frayret, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Waste paper procurement optimization: An agent-based simulation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 987-998.
    7. Cardona-Valdés, Y. & Álvarez, A. & Pacheco, J., 2014. "Metaheuristic procedure for a bi-objective supply chain design problem with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 66-84.
    8. Amid, A. & Ghodsypour, S.H. & O'Brien, C., 2006. "Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 394-407, December.
    9. Lei Zhang & David Levinson, 2004. "An Agent-Based Approach to Travel Demand Modeling: An Exploratory Analysis," Working Papers 200405, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    10. Sridharan, R., 1995. "The capacitated plant location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 203-213, December.
    11. Kaihara, Toshiya, 2003. "Multi-agent based supply chain modelling with dynamic environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 263-269, August.
    12. Roorda, Matthew J. & Cavalcante, Rinaldo & McCabe, Stephanie & Kwan, Helen, 2010. "A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 18-31, January.
    13. Ruiz, Rubén & Maroto, Concepciøn & Alcaraz, Javier, 2006. "Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 461-476, October.
    14. Nozick, Linda K. & Turnquist, Mark A., 2001. "Inventory, transportation, service quality and the location of distribution centers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 362-371, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asrat Mekonnen Gobachew & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2023. "Scenario-Based Optimization of Supply Chain Performance under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Barenji, Ali Vatankhah & Wang, W.M. & Li, Zhi & Guerra-Zubiaga, David A., 2019. "Intelligent E-commerce logistics platform using hybrid agent based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 15-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. H. Alavidoost & Mosahar Tarimoradi & M. H. Fazel Zarandi, 2018. "Bi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear programming for multi-commodity tri-echelon supply chain networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 809-826, April.
    2. Liu, Kaijun & Zhou, Yonghong & Zhang, Zigang, 2010. "Capacitated location model with online demand pooling in a multi-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 218-231, November.
    3. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    4. Leyla Ozsen & Collette R. Coullard & Mark S. Daskin, 2008. "Capacitated warehouse location model with risk pooling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 295-312, June.
    5. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.
    6. Schuster Puga, Matías & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2017. "A heuristic algorithm for solving large location–inventory problems with demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 413-423.
    7. Salah Alden Ghasimi & Rizauddin Ramli & Nizaroyani Saibani & Khashayar Danesh Narooei, 2018. "An uncertain mathematical model to maximize profit of the defective goods supply chain by selecting appropriate suppliers," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1219-1234, August.
    8. Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Trade-offs Between Customer Service and Cost in Integrated Supply Chain Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 188-207, September.
    9. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2008. "An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection--An application oriented to lead-time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 763-781, February.
    10. T Sloan, 2010. "First, do no harm? A framework for evaluating new versus reprocessed medical devices," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(2), pages 191-201, February.
    11. Woo, Hong Seng & Saghiri, Soroosh, 2011. "Order assignment considering buyer, third-party logistics provider, and suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 144-152, April.
    12. Mohammed, Ahmed & Harris, Irina & Govindan, Kannan, 2019. "A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 171-184.
    13. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    14. Hosseininasab, Amin & Ahmadi, Abbas, 2015. "Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 146-156.
    15. Yong Liang & Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen & Runyu Tang, 2021. "Data Center Network Design for Internet‐Related Services and Cloud Computing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2077-2101, July.
    16. Jeet, Vishv & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2018. "Part commonality effects on integrated network design and inventory models for low-demand service parts logistics systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 46-58.
    17. Fathi, Mahdi & Khakifirooz, Marzieh & Diabat, Ali & Chen, Huangen, 2021. "An integrated queuing-stochastic optimization hybrid Genetic Algorithm for a location-inventory supply chain network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    18. Chang, Liu & Ouzrout, Yacine & Nongaillard, Antoine & Bouras, Abdelaziz & Jiliu, Zhou, 2014. "Multi-criteria decision making based on trust and reputation in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 362-372.
    19. Sourirajan, Karthik & Ozsen, Leyla & Uzsoy, Reha, 2009. "A genetic algorithm for a single product network design model with lead time and safety stock considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 599-608, September.
    20. Ashoke Kumar Bera & Dipak Kumar Jana & Debamalya Banerjee & Titas Nandy, 2021. "A Two-Phase Multi-criteria Fuzzy Group Decision Making Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Order Allocation Considering Multi-objective, Multi-product and Multi-period," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 577-601, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1170-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.