IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v50y2022i5d10.1007_s11747-022-00847-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not the relationship type? Loyalty propensity as a reason to maintain marketing relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy S. Wolter

    (Auburn University)

  • Dora E. Bock

    (Auburn University)

  • Christopher D. Hopkins

    (Auburn University)

  • Michael Giebelhausen

    (Clemson University)

Abstract

The relationship marketing literature largely overlooks the most common type of loyal consumer, one who feels no personal attachment to a firm (Guo et al., Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,45(3), 357–376, 2017). To explain why so many consumers engage in this pragmatic form of loyalty, we bridge the loyalty and relationship marketing literature to reconsider the conceptualization and measurement of loyalty propensity. In particular, the present research provides evidence of loyalty propensity as a multi-dimensional relational schema that draws from consumers’ self-identity as a moral actor and less altruistic traits (e.g., deal proneness). As per these theoretical foundations, we develop a two-dimensional scale for loyalty propensity and assess it across four studies. The results indicate that loyalty propensity predicts loyalty outcomes (e.g., loyalty and economic exchange), whereas relational constructs (i.e., preference for closeness) predict relational outcomes (e.g., attachment and social exchange). A field study shows that loyalty propensity strongly predicts consumer responsiveness to a firm’s loyalty investments (e.g., sales agents’ customer orientation). Overall, the present research provides a way to expand the view of consumers as either relational or transactional.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy S. Wolter & Dora E. Bock & Christopher D. Hopkins & Michael Giebelhausen, 2022. "Not the relationship type? Loyalty propensity as a reason to maintain marketing relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1052-1070, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:50:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11747-022-00847-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-022-00847-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-022-00847-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-022-00847-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O., 2004. "The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 98-107, February.
    2. Mengchen Dong & Jan-Willem van Prooijen & Paul A M van Lange, 2019. "Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy: Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Demoulin, Nathalie T.M. & Zidda, Pietro, 2009. "Drivers of Customers’ Adoption and Adoption Timing of a New Loyalty Card in the Grocery Retail Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 391-405.
    4. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    5. Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2021. "An updated paradigm for evaluating measurement invariance incorporating common method variance and its assessment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 5-29, January.
    6. Valette-Florence, Pierre & Guizani, Haythem & Merunka, Dwight, 2011. "The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 24-28, January.
    7. Ashley, Christy & Noble, Stephanie M. & Donthu, Naveen & Lemon, Katherine N., 2011. "Why customers won't relate: Obstacles to relationship marketing engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 749-756, July.
    8. Pierre Valette-Florence & Haythem Guizani & Dwight Merunka, 2011. "The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity," Post-Print hal-01822306, HAL.
    9. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    10. Jan E. Stets & Michael J. Carter, 2006. "The Moral Identity: A Principle Level Identity," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Kent A. McClelland & Thomas J. Fararo (ed.), Purpose, Meaning, and Action, chapter 12, pages 293-316, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Yi-Chun Ou & Peter C. Verhoef & Thorsten Wiesel, 2017. "The effects of customer equity drivers on loyalty across services industries and firms," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 336-356, May.
    12. Lichtenstein, Donald R & Netemeyer, Richard G & Burton, Scot, 1995. "Assessing the Domain Specificity of Deal Proneness: A Field Study," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 314-326, December.
    13. Lin Guo & Thomas W. Gruen & Chuanyi Tang, 2017. "Seeing relationships through the lens of psychological contracts: the structure of consumer service relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 357-376, May.
    14. Conor M. Henderson & Lena Steinhoff & Colleen M. Harmeling & Robert W. Palmatier, 2021. "Customer inertia marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 350-373, March.
    15. Valentini, Sara & Neslin, Scott A. & Montaguti, Elisa, 2020. "Identifying omnichannel deal prone segments, their antecedents, and their consequences," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 310-327.
    16. Marta Dapena-Baron & Thomas W. Gruen & Lin Guo, 2020. "Heart, head, and hand: a tripartite conceptualization, operationalization, and examination of brand loyalty," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 355-375, May.
    17. Pierre Valette-Florence & H. Guizani & Dwight Merunka, 2011. "The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity," Post-Print halshs-00786047, HAL.
    18. Axelrod, Robert, 1973. "Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1248-1266, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takumi Kato & Nobu Takenaka & Rie Ito & Kazuki Nishiguchi, 2023. "Selection versus scale: Loyalty indices for brand management," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 836-853, December.
    2. Krishen, Anjala S. & Berezan, Orie & Agarwal, Shaurya & Kachen, Sheen, 2023. "Affective commitment recipes for wine clubs: Value goes beyond the vine," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anant Jyoti Badgaiyan & Saumya Dixit & Anshul Verma, 2017. "If brands are people, then people are impulsive—assessing the connection between brand personality and impulsive buying behaviour," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(6), pages 622-638, November.
    2. Mohammad Reza Hamidizadeh & Mohammad Reza Karimi Alavije & Morteza Rezaee, 2014. "The Effect of Perceived Business Ethics on Brand Personality Dimensions & Creation of Brand Equity in Developing Countries," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 46-53.
    3. Lara-Rodríguez, Juan Sebastián & Rojas-Contreras, Camilo & Duque Oliva, Edison Jair, 2019. "Discovering emerging research topics for brand personality: A bibliometric analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 261-272.
    4. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & Krey, Nina & Babin, Barry J. & Ivens, Bjoern S., 2016. "Brand management in higher education: The University Brand Personality Scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3077-3086.
    5. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    6. Aloy Okafor & Olusoji George, 2016. "Theorising the Concept of Product Branding: A Qualitative Approach to the History of Branding; the Case of the Nigerian Milk Industry," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 84-96, April.
    7. Chen, Lijun & Parcell, Joe L & Chen, Chao & James, Harvey S. Jr & Xu, Danning, 2016. "Consumer preference for supermarket food sampling in China," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236043, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Wu, Chih-Wen, 2014. "The study of service innovation for digiservice on loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 819-824.
    9. Chofor Joyvice & Johannes Tabi Atemnkeng & Molem Christopher Sama & MBU Sunday Agbor & NEBA Noela Buwah, 2019. "The Effect of Deceptive Marketing Communication on the Brand Equity of Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) in the Northwest and Southwest Regions of Cameroon," International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Mehran REZVANI & Seyed Hamid Khodadad HOSEINI & Mohammad Mehdi SAMADZADEH, 2012. "Investigating the Role of Word of Mouth on Consumer Based Brand Equity Creation in Iran’s Cell-Phone Market," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 2(1), pages 1-3, February.
    11. Jingyu Li & Anding Zhu & Dongsheng Liu & Wenmin Zhao & Yi Zhou & Yahui Chen & Yanni Liu & Nan Sun, 2020. "Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Evodia Mankuroane & Wilme van Heerden & Sune Ferreira-Schenk & Zandri Dickason-Koekemoer, 2022. "Psychological and Behavioural Drivers of Short-Term Investment Intentions," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 19-27, July.
    13. Bilal Gerekan & Abdulkadir Pehlivan & Mahmut Kocan, 2019. "The Effect of Firm Growth on Brand Value: Evidence from Brand Finance Turkey-100," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(9), pages 1067-1076, September.
    14. G. R. Chen, 2014. "How do advertised brands benefit from private labels? An application of rational expectations models," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(24), pages 2891-2902, August.
    15. Rojas-Méndez, José I. & Murphy, Steven A. & Papadopoulos, Nicolas, 2013. "The U.S. brand personality: A Sino perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1028-1034.
    16. Sandeep Kumar & Sidheswar Patra, 2017. "Does Promotion Mix Really Help to Enhance Brand Equity: A Literature Review," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 8(2), pages 80-86, May.
    17. Vikas Singla & Gaurav Gupta, 2019. "Emotional Branding Scale and Its Role in Formation of Brand Trust," Paradigm, , vol. 23(2), pages 148-163, December.
    18. Jorge Mejia & Anandasivam Gopal & Michael Trusov, 2020. "Deal or No Deal? Online Deals, Retailer Heterogeneity, and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive Environment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1087-1106, December.
    19. Buil, Isabel & de Chernatony, Leslie & Martínez, Eva, 2013. "Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-122.
    20. Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2020. "Marketing Mix Elements and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do they Really Matter to Store Image?," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 56-71, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:50:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11747-022-00847-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.