IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v7y2003i3d10.1023_a1027372722187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Flow Shop Scheduling Polyhedron with Setup Times

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado

    (Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, AP 111—F, Cd. Universitaria)

  • Jonathan F. Bard

    (University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of improving the polyhedral representation of a certain class of machine scheduling problems. Despite the poor polyhedral representation of many such problems in general, it is shown that notably tighter linear programming representations can be obtained for many important models. In particular, we study the polyhedral structure of two different mixed-integer programming formulations of the flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times, denoted by SDST flow shop. The first is related to the asymmetric traveling salesman problem (ATSP) polytope. The second is less common and is derived from a model proposed by Srikar and Ghosh based on the linear ordering problem (LOP) polytope. The main contribution of this work is the proof that any facet-defining inequality (facet) of either of these polytopes (ATSP and LOP) induces a facet for the corresponding SDST flow shop polyhedron. The immediate benefit of this result is that all developments to date on facets and valid inequalities for both the ATSP and the LOP can be applied directly to the machine scheduling polytope. In addition, valid mixed-integer inequalities based on variable upper-bound flow inequalities for either model are developed as well. The derived cuts are evaluated within a branch-and-cut framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Jonathan F. Bard, 2003. "The Flow Shop Scheduling Polyhedron with Setup Times," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 291-318, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:7:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1027372722187
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1027372722187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1027372722187
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1027372722187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Egon Balas & Matteo Fischetti, 1992. "The Fixed-Outdegree 1-Arborescence Polytope," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 1001-1018, November.
    2. Matteo Fischetti, 1991. "Facets of the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Polytope," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 42-56, February.
    3. Rios-Mercado, Roger Z. & Bard, Jonathan F., 1998. "Heuristics for the flow line problem with setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 76-98, October.
    4. Burton D. Corwin & Augustine O. Esogbue, 1974. "Two machine flow shop scheduling problems with sequence dependent setup times: A dynamic programming approach," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 515-524, September.
    5. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    6. Maurice Queyranne & Yaoguang Wang, 1995. "Symmetric Inequalities and Their Composition for Asymmetric Travelling Salesman Polytopes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 838-863, November.
    7. Simons, JV, 1992. "Heuristics in flow shop scheduling with sequence dependent setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 215-225, March.
    8. Fishburn, Peter C., 1992. "Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: a status report," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-80, February.
    9. Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Darrow, William P., 1986. "The two-machine sequence dependent flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 439-446, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciavotta, Michele & Minella, Gerardo & Ruiz, Rubén, 2013. "Multi-objective sequence dependent setup times permutation flowshop: A new algorithm and a comprehensive study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 301-313.
    2. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    3. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2008. "An Iterated Greedy heuristic for the sequence dependent setup times flowshop problem with makespan and weighted tardiness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1143-1159, June.
    4. Yunhe Wang & Xiangtao Li & Zhiqiang Ma, 2017. "A Hybrid Local Search Algorithm for the Sequence Dependent Setup Times Flowshop Scheduling Problem with Makespan Criterion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-35, December.
    5. V. Anjana & R. Sridharan & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2020. "Metaheuristics for solving a multi-objective flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 49-69, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagchi, Tapan P. & Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2006. "A review of TSP based approaches for flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 816-854, March.
    2. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion & Alcaraz, Javier, 2005. "Solving the flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times using advanced metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 34-54, August.
    3. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2008. "An Iterated Greedy heuristic for the sequence dependent setup times flowshop problem with makespan and weighted tardiness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1143-1159, June.
    4. Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh & Mehdi Heydari & Mohammad Mahdavi Mazdeh, 2022. "Mathematical modeling and two metaheuristic algorithms for integrated process planning and group scheduling with sequence-dependent setup time," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5055-5105, November.
    5. Ciavotta, Michele & Detti, Paolo & Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco, 2008. "A bi-objective coordination setup problem in a two-stage production system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 734-745, September.
    6. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    7. F T Tseng & J N D Gupta & E F Stafford, 2006. "A penalty-based heuristic algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent set-up times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 541-551, May.
    8. Yunhe Wang & Xiangtao Li & Zhiqiang Ma, 2017. "A Hybrid Local Search Algorithm for the Sequence Dependent Setup Times Flowshop Scheduling Problem with Makespan Criterion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-35, December.
    9. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    10. Weng, Michael X. & Lu, John & Ren, Haiying, 2001. "Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with setup consideration and a total weighted completion time objective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 215-226, April.
    11. Rios-Mercado, Roger Z. & Bard, Jonathan F., 1998. "Heuristics for the flow line problem with setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 76-98, October.
    12. Marko Ɖurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2019. "Creating dispatching rules by simple ensemble combination," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 959-1013, December.
    13. De Donder, Philippe & Le Breton, Michel & Truchon, Michel, 2000. "Choosing from a weighted tournament1," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 85-109, July.
    14. Lin, Hung-Tso & Liao, Ching-Jong, 2003. "A case study in a two-stage hybrid flow shop with setup time and dedicated machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 133-143, November.
    15. Shen, Liji & Buscher, Udo, 2012. "Solving the serial batching problem in job shop manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 14-26.
    16. Yuichi Kitamura & Jörg Stoye, 2018. "Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 1883-1909, November.
    17. Shahvari, Omid & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2016. "Hybrid flow shop batching and scheduling with a bi-criteria objective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 239-258.
    18. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    19. Faruk Gul & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2006. "Random Expected Utility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 121-146, January.
    20. S-W Lin & K-C Ying, 2008. "A hybrid approach for single-machine tardiness problems with sequence-dependent setup times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(8), pages 1109-1119, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:7:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1027372722187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.