IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v45y2023i2d10.1007_s10878-023-00994-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-specific discussion of Airbnb usage knowledge graphs for improving private social systems

Author

Listed:
  • Salomi Samsudeen

    (SRMIST)

  • Mohammed Hasan Ali

    (Imam Ja’afar Al-Sadiq University)

  • C. Chandru Vignesh

    (Vellore Institute of Technology)

  • M. M. Kamruzzaman

    (Jouf University)

  • Chander Prakash

    (Lovely Professional University)

  • Tamizharasi Thirugnanam

    (Vellore Institute of Technology)

  • J. Alfred Daniel

    (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education)

Abstract

This research concentrates on extracting and context-specific discussion of Airbnb usage knowledge graphs to improve private social systems. The Knowledge-Infused Learning Techniques are applied to the learning and social impact of Airbnb usage user's system. This research Extracting and discusses Airbnb usage using knowledge graphs. This research formulates the two proposed methods for Extracting Airbnb usage knowledge graphs to improve private social systems. This research enables the two potential implications for user expectation Extraction and context-specific discussion about personal social systems. This might be useful to enhance the specific services of personal social systems. This led by using the knowledge graphs concerning the responsibilities and services using response-based Optical Character Recognition. This might be fulfilled with the internal data and explain factor for "Airbnb private systems" based on knowledge graphs and machine learning. However, the Graph convolutional networks work based on the Convolutional Neural Networks for automatically Extracting the essential features without any human supervision based on a context-specific discussion of Airbnb systems. The financial portion of the computational social system application is 45.8%, followed by the public health portion at 56.8%, the environment portion at 69.3%, the politics policy portion at 72%, the social behavior portion at 78%, the human behavior portion at 80%, and the social system portion at 85% better performance in the Airbnb usage knowledge process. The efficiency of this analysis is around 67.9%. The input data second level range is 23–39%, the improved accuracy range is 74.38%, and the increased accuracy range is 46.33%. The enhanced accuracy range is 96.5%, and the third-level input data range is 43–59%. This rough comparison result has an efficiency of 62.51%. The outcomes of several social network comparison experiments are compared to the knowledge-infused learning and classification model, and the estimated result is 73.8% efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomi Samsudeen & Mohammed Hasan Ali & C. Chandru Vignesh & M. M. Kamruzzaman & Chander Prakash & Tamizharasi Thirugnanam & J. Alfred Daniel, 2023. "Context-specific discussion of Airbnb usage knowledge graphs for improving private social systems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-023-00994-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-023-00994-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-023-00994-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-023-00994-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long Zuo & Shuo Xiong & Xin Qi & Zheng Wen & Yiwen Tang & Wei Wang, 2021. "Communication-Based Book Recommendation in Computational Social Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, January.
    2. Jake M. Hofman & Duncan J. Watts & Susan Athey & Filiz Garip & Thomas L. Griffiths & Jon Kleinberg & Helen Margetts & Sendhil Mullainathan & Matthew J. Salganik & Simine Vazire & Alessandro Vespignani, 2021. "Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science," Nature, Nature, vol. 595(7866), pages 181-188, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ari Hyytinen & Petri Rouvinen & Mika Pajarinen & Joosua Virtanen, 2023. "Ex Ante Predictability of Rapid Growth: A Design Science Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2465-2493, November.
    2. Miguel G. Folgado & Veronica Sanz, 2022. "Exploring the political pulse of a country using data science tools," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 987-1000, May.
    3. Elizabeth Dolan & James Goulding & Harry Marshall & Gavin Smith & Gavin Long & Laila J. Tata, 2023. "Assessing the value of integrating national longitudinal shopping data into respiratory disease forecasting models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Simon Willcock & Javier Martinez-Lopez & Norman Dandy & James M. Bullock, 2021. "High Spatial-Temporal Resolution Data across Large Scales Are Needed to Transform Our Understanding of Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Cerqua, Augusto & Letta, Marco, 2022. "Local inequalities of the COVID-19 crisis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Lu Liu & Benjamin F. Jones & Brian Uzzi & Dashun Wang, 2023. "Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1046-1058, July.
    7. Grossmann, Igor & Rotella, Amanda A. & Hutcherson, Cendri & Sharpinskyi, Konstantyn & Varnum, Michael E. W. & Achter, Sebastian K. & Dhami, Mandeep & Guo, Xinqi Evie & Kara-Yakoubian, Mane R. & Mandel, 2023. "Insights into the accuracy of social scientists' forecasts of societal change," Other publications TiSEM c14f4a4a-b105-46b3-90f7-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Renáta Németh, 2023. "A scoping review on the use of natural language processing in research on political polarization: trends and research prospects," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 289-313, April.
    9. Rory Gibb & Felipe J. Colón-González & Phan Trong Lan & Phan Thi Huong & Vu Sinh Nam & Vu Trong Duoc & Do Thai Hung & Nguyễn Thanh Dong & Vien Chinh Chien & Ly Thi Thuy Trang & Do Kien Quoc & Tran Min, 2023. "Interactions between climate change, urban infrastructure and mobility are driving dengue emergence in Vietnam," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Nelson P. Rayl & Nitish R. Sinha, 2022. "Integrating Prediction and Attribution to Classify News," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-042, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Isabelle Bonhoure & Anna Cigarini & Julián Vicens & Bàrbara Mitats & Josep Perelló, 2023. "Reformulating computational social science with citizen social science: the case of a community-based mental health care research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Filippo Simini & Gianni Barlacchi & Massimilano Luca & Luca Pappalardo, 2021. "A Deep Gravity model for mobility flows generation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Oriol J. Bosch & Melanie Revilla, 2022. "When survey science met web tracking: Presenting an error framework for metered data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(S2), pages 408-436, December.
    14. Islam, Towhidul & Meade, Nigel & Carson, Richard T. & Louviere, Jordan J. & Wang, Juan, 2022. "The usefulness of socio-demographic variables in predicting purchase decisions: Evidence from machine learning procedures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 324-338.
    15. Gary Charness & Brian Jabarian & John List, 2023. "Generation Next: Experimentation with AI," Artefactual Field Experiments 00777, The Field Experiments Website.
    16. Tavishi Priyam & Tao Ruan & Qin Lv, 2023. "Demographic-Based Public Perception Analysis of Electric Vehicles on Online Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-023-00994-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.