To belong or not to belong, that is the question?! Explorative insights on liminal gender states within women’s STEMpreneurship

Scientific discourses about entrepreneurialism have long been dominated by neo-liberal thinking that categorizes it as gender-neutral. The last two decades however have seen entrepreneurship research develop a more nuanced understanding of gender. Taking the recent findings of entrepreneurial belonging (EB) as dynamic and relational as a starting point, this article aims to better understand how women entrepreneurs are affected by the challenges and chances of defining and negotiating the genderedness of EB. The concept of liminality is used as a critical perspective to gain insights on how women entrepreneurs accomplish entrepreneurial belonging in what is considered a predominantly masculine field like STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics). Insights into explorative interviews question the need for a linear or static “fixed” approach of (un)doing gender to foster belonging. More precisely, the data reveal that liminal gender states (LGSs) of EB are linked to the situational perception of dissonance between the subjective ideas of womanhood and a disciplinary as well as entrepreneurial masculine normative frame. And indeed, the data indicate that women STEMpreneurs are continuously triggered by the genderedness of their EB as being a state “betwixt and between” normative frames. One the one hand, they feel challenged by the dissonance of LGSs. On the other hand, the interviews also reveal that this challenge turns into an opportunity in situations where LGSs are strategically used to build upon new entrepreneurial routines and roles that foster a state of uniqueness.