IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/vyid10.1007_s10796-019-09915-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Lukyanenko

    (HEC Montréal)

  • Andrea Wiggins

    (University of Nebraska Omaha)

  • Holly K. Rosser

    (University of Nebraska Omaha)

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of online content producing and sharing technologies resulted in an explosion of user-generated content (UGC), which now extends to scientific data. Citizen science, in which ordinary people contribute information for scientific research, epitomizes UGC. Citizen science projects are typically open to everyone, engage diverse audiences, and challenge ordinary people to produce data of highest quality to be usable in science. This also makes citizen science a very exciting area to study both traditional and innovative approaches to information quality management. With this paper we position citizen science as a leading information quality research frontier. We also show how citizen science opens a unique opportunity for the information systems community to contribute to a broad range of disciplines in natural and social sciences and humanities.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s10796-019-09915-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ofer Arazy & Rick Kopak, 2011. "On the measurability of information quality," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 89-99, January.
    2. Gerald C. Kane & Sam Ransbotham, 2016. "Research Note—Content and Collaboration: An Affiliation Network Approach to Information Quality in Online Peer Production Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 424-439, June.
    3. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Neil Stewart & Christoph Ungemach & Adam J. L. Harris & Daniel M. Bartels & Ben R. Newell & Gabriele Paolacci & Jesse Chandler, "undated". "The Average Laboratory Samples a Population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f97b669c7b3e4c2ab95c9f805, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Hongwei Zhu & Harris Wu, 2011. "Quality of data standards: framework and illustration using XBRL taxonomy and instances," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 21(2), pages 129-139, June.
    6. Jonathan Silvertown, 2010. "Taxonomy: include social networking," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7317), pages 788-788, October.
    7. Mi (Jamie) Zhou & Baozhou Lu & Weiguo (Patrick) Fan & G. Alan Wang, 2018. "Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 259-274, April.
    8. Ofer Arazy & Rick Kopak, 2011. "On the measurability of information quality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 89-99, January.
    9. Edward J. Garrity, 2001. "Synthesizing User Centered and Designer Centered IS Development Approaches Using General Systems Theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 107-121, March.
    10. Jian Tang & Ping Zhang & Philip Fei Wu, 2015. "Categorizing consumer behavioral responses and artifact design features: The case of online advertising," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-532, June.
    11. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-130, November.
    12. Andrew Burton-Jones & Olga Volkoff, 2017. "How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 468-489, September.
    13. Mi (Jamie) Zhou & Baozhou Lu & Weiguo (Patrick) Fan & G. Alan Wang, 0. "Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    14. Anjana Susarla & Jeong-Ha Oh & Yong Tan, 2012. "Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, March.
    15. Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor & Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Pushp Patil & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Sridhar Nerur, 2018. "Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 531-558, June.
    16. Nathan Hopkins & Mary Tate & Allan Sylvester & David Johnstone, 2017. "Motivations for 21st century school children to bring their own device to school," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1191-1203, October.
    17. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    18. Heinz K. Klein & Rudy Hirschheim, 2001. "Choosing Between Competing Design Ideals in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 75-90, March.
    19. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    20. Jeffrey Parsons & Roman Lukyanenko & Yolanda Wiersma, 2011. "Easier citizen science is better," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7336), pages 37-37, March.
    21. Yuxiang Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2014. "Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 417-434, July.
    22. John M. Jordan, 2017. "Challenges to large-scale digital organization: the case of Uber," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    23. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    24. Nathan Hopkins & Mary Tate & Allan Sylvester & David Johnstone, 0. "Motivations for 21st century school children to bring their own device to school," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    25. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    26. Agung Wahyudi & George Kuk & Marijn Janssen, 2018. "A Process Pattern Model for Tackling and Improving Big Data Quality," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 457-469, June.
    27. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 243-243, December.
    28. Paul A. Pavlou & Angelika Dimoka, 2006. "The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 392-414, December.
    29. Sabrina Sicari & Cinzia Cappiello & Francesco Pellegrini & Daniele Miorandi & Alberto Coen-Porisini, 2016. "A security-and quality-aware system architecture for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 665-677, August.
    30. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    31. Yair Wand & Ron Weber, 2002. "Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling—A Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 363-376, December.
    32. Donald P. Ballou & Harold L. Pazer, 1995. "Designing Information Systems to Optimize the Accuracy-Timeliness Tradeoff," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 51-72, March.
    33. Ofer Arazy & Johannes Daxenberger & Hila Lifshitz-Assaf & Oded Nov & Iryna Gurevych, 2016. "Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-Organizing Knowledge Coproduction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 792-812, December.
    34. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:5:p:479-491 is not listed on IDEAS
    35. Trisha Gura, 2013. "Citizen science: Amateur experts," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7444), pages 259-261, April.
    36. Palacios, Miguel & Martinez-Corral, Alberto & Nisar, Arsalan & Grijalvo, Mercedes, 2016. "Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1834-1839.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi Liu & Gengzhong Feng & Giri Kumar Tayi & Jun Tian, 2021. "Managing Data Quality of the Data Warehouse: A Chance-Constrained Programming Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 375-389, April.
    2. Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa & Hassan Abdelmoety, Ziad, 2021. "Examining the influence of cultural and ethical ideology on consumers’ perceptions about the ethics of online retailers and its effects on their loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Christof Weinhardt & Simon Kloker & Oliver Hinz & Wil M. P. Aalst, 2020. "Citizen Science in Information Systems Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 273-277, August.
    4. Franco Arolfo & Kevin Cortés Rodriguez & Alejandro Vaisman, 2022. "Analyzing the Quality of Twitter Data Streams," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 349-369, February.
    5. Judita Peterlin & Maja Meško & Vlado Dimovski & Vasja Roblek, 2021. "Automated content analysis: The review of the big data systemic discourse in tourism and hospitality," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 377-385, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 2020. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 961-983, August.
    2. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    3. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    4. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    5. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    6. Michael J. Ryoba & Shaojian Qu & Yongyi Zhou, 2021. "Feature subset selection for predicting the success of crowdfunding project campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 671-684, September.
    7. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    8. Chan, Ho Fai & Moy, Naomi & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2021. "The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 443-455.
    9. Qianzhou Du & Jing Li & Yanqing Du & G. Alan Wang & Weiguo Fan, 2021. "Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(12), pages 1558-1574, December.
    10. Xiongfei Cao & Ali Nawaz Khan & Ahsan Ali & Naseer Abbas Khan, 0. "Consequences of Cyberbullying and Social Overload while Using SNSs: A Study of Users’ Discontinuous Usage Behavior in SNSs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    11. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Cawley Vergara, Alejandro Mac & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Sawhney, Rapinder, 2020. "Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 284-294.
    12. Sokolova, Karina & Kefi, Hajer, 2020. "Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    13. Xiongfei Cao & Ali Nawaz Khan & Ahsan Ali & Naseer Abbas Khan, 2020. "Consequences of Cyberbullying and Social Overload while Using SNSs: A Study of Users’ Discontinuous Usage Behavior in SNSs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1343-1356, December.
    14. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    15. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    16. Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor & Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Pushp Patil & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Sridhar Nerur, 2018. "Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 531-558, June.
    17. Chan, C.S. Richard & Park, Haemin Dennis & Huang, Julie Y. & Parhankangas, Annaleena, 2020. "Less is more? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between readability and screening evaluations across pitch competition and crowdfunding contexts," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    18. D. Laurie Hughes & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "Elucidation of IS project success factors: an interpretive structural modelling approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 35-66, February.
    19. Mochen Yang & Yuqing Ren & Gediminas Adomavicius, 2019. "Understanding User-Generated Content and Customer Engagement on Facebook Business Pages," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 839-855, September.
    20. Ranjana Raghunathan, 2022. "Everyday Intimacies and Inter-Ethnic Relationships: Tracing Entanglements of Gender and Race in Multicultural Singapore," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 77-94, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s10796-019-09915-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.