IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fuzodm/v16y2017i4d10.1007_s10700-016-9257-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment

Author

Listed:
  • Zeshui Xu

    (Sichuan University)

  • Wei Zhou

    (Yunnan University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

As a generalized fuzzy number, the hesitant fuzzy element (HFE) has been receiving increased attention and has recently become a popular topic. However, we find that the occurring probabilities of the possible values in the HFE are equal, which is obviously impractical. Consequently, in this paper, we propose a hesitant fuzzy number with probabilities, called the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy number, and construct its score function, deviation function, comparison laws, and its basic operations. It is well known that in the context of a group of decision makers (DMs), one of the basic approaches to built consensus is to aggregate individual evaluations or individual priorities. Thus, to use the hesitant fuzzy numbers for consensus building with a group of DMs, we further propose a method called maximizing score deviation method to obtain the DMs’ weights under the HPFE environment, based on which two extended and four new ordered weighted operators are provided to fuse the HPFE information and build the consensus of the DMs. We also analyze the differences among these ordered weighted operators and provide their application scopes. Finally, a practical case is provided to demonstrate consensus building with a group of DMs under the HPFE environment using the proposed approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeshui Xu & Wei Zhou, 2017. "Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 481-503, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9257-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Wei & Xu, Zeshui, 2016. "Generalized asymmetric linguistic term set and its application to qualitative decision making involving risk appetites," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 610-621.
    2. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi & Feng, Bo, 2010. "The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 455-463, June.
    3. Horace W. Brock, 1980. "The Problem of “Utility Weights” in Group Preference Aggregation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 176-187, February.
    4. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1994. "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 249-265, December.
    5. Alfredo Altuzarra & José María Moreno-Jiménez & Manuel Salvador, 2010. "Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1755-1773, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zixue Guo & Sijia Liu, 2023. "Study on the Selection of Pharmaceutical E-Commerce Platform Considering Bounded Rationality under Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Weiming Li & Jun Ye, 2022. "Group Decision-Making Problems Based on Mixed Aggregation Operations of Interval-Valued Fuzzy and Entropy Elements in Single- and Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Hongyue Diao & Ansheng Deng & Hui Cui & Xin Liu & Li Zou, 2022. "An approach for solving fuzzy multi-criteria decision problem under linguistic information," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 45-69, March.
    5. Xiao-kang Wang & Sheng-hui Wang & Hong-yu Zhang & Jian-qiang Wang & Lin Li, 2021. "The Recommendation Method for Hotel Selection Under Traveller Preference Characteristics: A Cloud-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1433-1469, December.
    6. Songtao Shao & Xiaohong Zhang, 2019. "Measures of Probabilistic Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and the Application in Reducing Unnecessary Evaluation Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Hüseyin Akay & Müsteyde Baduna Koçyiğit, 2021. "An Approach for Determination of the Drainage Network Effect on GIUH Using Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3873-3902, September.
    8. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Harish Garg & Gagandeep Kaur, 2018. "Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators with New Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-30, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 521-530.
    2. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2012. "An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 167-176.
    3. Wu, Zhibin & Huang, Shuai & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 182-194.
    4. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    5. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    6. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2019. "A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1017-1027.
    7. Juan Aguarón & María Teresa Escobar & José María Moreno-Jiménez, 2016. "The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 245-259, October.
    8. Manuel Salvador & Alfredo Altuzarra & Pilar Gargallo & José María Moreno-Jiménez, 2015. "A Bayesian Approach to Maximising Inner Compatibility in AHP-Systemic Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 655-673, July.
    9. Sun, Bingzhen & Ma, Weimin, 2015. "An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-92.
    10. Bowen Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2019. "Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 585-617, June.
    11. Sen Liu & Wei Yu & Ling Liu & Yanan Hu, 2019. "Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker’s weights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2012. "Minimizing Group Discordance Optimization Model for Deriving Expert Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 863-875, November.
    13. Juan Aguarón & María Teresa Escobar & José María Moreno-Jiménez, 2023. "Reducing incompatibility in a local AHP-group decision making context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 1-26, July.
    14. José María Moreno-Jiménez & Manuel Salvador & Pilar Gargallo & Alfredo Altuzarra, 2016. "Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 261-284, October.
    15. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2013. "On Consensus of Group Decision Making with Interval Utility Values and Interval Preference Orderings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 997-1019, November.
    16. Alfredo Altuzarra & Pilar Gargallo & José María Moreno-Jiménez & Manuel Salvador, 2022. "Identification of Homogeneous Groups of Actors in a Local AHP-Multiactor Context with a High Number of Decision-Makers: A Bayesian Stochastic Search," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Xiao, Jing & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2021. "Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Changsheng Lin & Gang Kou & Yi Peng & Fawaz E. Alsaadi, 2022. "Aggregation of the nearest consistency matrices with the acceptable consensus in AHP-GDM," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 179-195, September.
    19. Alfredo Altuzarra & Pilar Gargallo & José María Moreno-Jiménez & Manuel Salvador, 2019. "Homogeneous Groups of Actors in an AHP-Local Decision Making Context: A Bayesian Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9257-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.