This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Fast accurate binomial pricing

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
L.C.G. Rogers () (University of Bath, School of Mathematical Sciences, Bath BA2 7AY, Great Britain)
E.J. Stapleton () (University of Bath, School of Mathematical Sciences, Bath BA2 7AY, Great Britain)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We discuss here an alternative interpretation of the familiar binomial lattice approach to option pricing, illustrating it with reference to pricing of barrier options, one- and two-sided, with fixed, moving or partial barriers, and also the pricing of American put options. It has often been observed that if one tries to price a barrier option using a binomial lattice, then one can find slow convergence to the true price unless care is taken over the placing of the grid points in the lattice; see, for example, the work of Boyle & Lau [2]. The placing of grid points is critical whether one uses a dynamic programming approach, or a Monte Carlo approach, and this can make it difficult to compute hedge ratios, for example. The problems arise from translating a crossing of the barrier for the continuous diffusion process into an event for the binomial approximation. In this article, we show that it is not necessary to make clever choices of the grid positioning, and by interpreting the nature of the binomial approximation appropriately, we are able to derive very quick and accurate pricings of barrier options. The interpretation we give here is applicable much more widely, and helps to smooth out the `odd-even' ripples in the option price as a function of time-to-go which are a common feature of binomial lattice pricing.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00780/papers/7002001/70020003.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
File URL: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00780/papers/7002001/70020003.ps.gz
File Format: application/postscript
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Springer in its journal Finance and Stochastics.

Volume (Year): 2 (1997)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 3-17
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:2:y:1997:i:1:p:3-17

Note: received: November 1996; final version received: April 1997
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/content/101164/

Order Information:
Web: http://link.springer.de/orders.htm

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Binomial pricing; barrier option; American option; Brownian motion;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing
G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Leisen, Dietmar, 1997. "The Random-Time Binomial Model," Discussion Paper Serie B 399, University of Bonn, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  2. B. Gao J. Huang, . "The Valuation of American Barrier Options Using the Decomposition Technique," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 99-002, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-. [Downloadable!]
  3. Emmanuel Gobet, 2009. "Advanced Monte Carlo methods for barrier and related exotic options," Post-Print hal-00319947_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
  4. Yuri Kifer, 2006. "Error estimates for binomial approximations of game options," Quantitative Finance Papers math/0607123, arXiv.org. [Downloadable!]
  5. Yan Dolinsky & Yuri Kifer, 2009. "Binomial Approximations for Barrier Options of Israeli Style," Quantitative Finance Papers 0907.4136, arXiv.org. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? To receive notification of recent additions to the database, subscribe to the free NEP reports.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.