IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v20y2018i6d10.1007_s10668-017-9996-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environment and sustainability of the Middle Route, South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China: a close look

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang-Zhou Xu

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Guo-Dong Song

    (Tsinghua University
    Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute)

  • Tian-Min Dang

    (North West Agriculture and Forestry University)

  • Jian-Wei Liu

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Hong-Wu Zhang

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Hang Gao

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Ya-Kun Liu

    (Dalian University of Technology)

Abstract

In many arid and semiarid regions, water scarcity, population increase and frequent droughts are exerting great pressures on water resources. Presently, the Mid-route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project (MRSN) was built to mitigate the water crisis in the north of China by long-distance transfer of water from the Yangtze River in southern China. This study investigated the running condition of the MRSN, including operation management, freezing situation and water quality. Water samples were also taken from different sites and then analyzed in laboratory. Results suggest that the project was reasonably designed and the project management was excellent. Closed management was adopted in the project to protect water quality. The sediment concentrations and water turbidities of the water samples were in the range of 0.2–0.8 kg/m3 and 0.8–1.7 NTU, respectively, which met or were close to the standards of drinking water in China. Water freezing is also not a problem, since the thickest ice was only 0.9 cm even in the coldest season as the authors measured the investigation, and at the same time, the ice booms worked well. In the future, it is promising that to effectively integrate the methods of self-rescuing and water importing could fundamentally conquer water shortage, reasonably allocate water resources and finally achieve the harmonious development of economics, ecology and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang-Zhou Xu & Guo-Dong Song & Tian-Min Dang & Jian-Wei Liu & Hong-Wu Zhang & Hang Gao & Ya-Kun Liu, 2018. "Environment and sustainability of the Middle Route, South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China: a close look," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2415-2426, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:20:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-017-9996-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-017-9996-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-017-9996-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-017-9996-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanemann, W. Michael, 2002. "The Central Arizona Project," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt87k436cf, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Antunes, Paula & Kallis, Giorgos & Videira, Nuno & Santos, Rui, 2009. "Participation and evaluation for sustainable river basin governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 931-939, February.
    3. Andrea Harrop Prichard & Christopher A. Scott, 2014. "Interbasin water transfers at the US-Mexico border city of Nogales, Sonora: implications for aquifers and water security," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 135-151, March.
    4. M. Rezapour Tabari & Abdollah Yazdi, 2014. "Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater with Inter-Basin Transfer Approach: Case Study Piranshahr," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1887-1906, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanfang Xu & Zhen Yao, "undated". "The impact of the south-to-north water diversion project on the usage of water-saving irrigation machinery," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202216, Reviewsep.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxwell C. Wilson & Xiao-Yan Li & Yu-Jun Ma & Andrew T. Smith & Jianguo Wu, 2017. "A Review of the Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of China’s South–North Water Transfer Project: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Jing Tian & Dedi Liu & Shenglian Guo & Zhengke Pan & Xingjun Hong, 2019. "Impacts of Inter-Basin Water Transfer Projects on Optimal Water Resources Allocation in the Hanjiang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Buchs, Arnaud & Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2021. "Challenging the ecological economics of water: Social and political perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. R. Roozbahani & B. Abbasi & S. Schreider, 2015. "Optimal allocation of water to competing stakeholders in a shared watershed," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 657-676, June.
    5. Garmendia, Eneko & Stagl, Sigrid, 2010. "Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1712-1722, June.
    6. Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Vivien, Franck-Dominique, 2017. "Common Patrimony: A Concept to Analyze Collective Natural Resource Management. The Case of Water Management in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 126-132.
    7. R. Roozbahani & B. Abbasi & S. Schreider & A. Ardakani, 2014. "A Multi-objective Approach for Transboundary River Water Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(15), pages 5447-5463, December.
    8. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Shanshan & Yue, Qing & Mao, Xiaomin & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Distributed AquaCrop simulation-nonlinear multi-objective dependent-chance programming for irrigation water resources management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Itziar Barinaga-Rementeria & Artitzar Erauskin-Tolosa & Pedro José Lozano & Itxaro Latasa, 2019. "Individual and Social Preferences in Participatory Multi-Criteria Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Gábor Király & Alexandra Köves & György Pataki & Gabriella Kiss, 2016. "Assessing the Participatory Potential of Systems Mapping," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 496-514, July.
    11. Jianhua Wang & Baodeng Hou & Yong Zhao & Weihua Xiao & Fan Lu, 2021. "Research on Scale Demonstration Technology of Inter Basin Water Transfer Project in Agricultural Irrigation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5243-5258, December.
    12. Jing Tian & Shenglian Guo & Dedi Liu & Zhengke Pan & Xingjun Hong, 2019. "A Fair Approach for Multi-Objective Water Resources Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(10), pages 3633-3653, August.
    13. Garmendia, Eneko & Gamboa, Gonzalo, 2012. "Weighting social preferences in participatory multi-criteria evaluations: A case study on sustainable natural resource management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 110-120.
    14. Vanda Carreira & João Reis Machado & Lia Vasconcelos, 2016. "Engaging Citizen Participation—A Result of Trusting Governmental Institutions and Politicians in the Portuguese Democracy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-11, August.
    15. Voghera, Angioletta, 2020. "The River agreement in Italy. Resilient planning for the co-evolution of communities and landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Shaw, W. Douglass & Woodward, Richard T., 2010. "Water Management, Risk, and Uncertainty: Things We Wish We Knew in the 21st Century," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15.
    17. Sandra Ricart & Sylvie Clarimont, 2017. "Qualifying irrigation system sustainability and governance by means of stakeholder perceptions: the Neste Canal (France)," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 935-954, November.
    18. García-López, Gustavo A. & Arizpe, Nancy, 2010. "Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 196-206, December.
    19. Carmona, Gema & Varela-Ortega, Consuelo & Bromley, John, 2011. "Participatory Modelling To Support Decision Making In Water Management. A Case Study In The Middle Guadiana Basin, Spain," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114320, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Eneko Garmendia & Gonzalo Gamboa, 2012. "Weighting social preferences in participatory multi-criteria evaluations: a case study on sustainable natural resource management," Working Papers 2012-06, BC3.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:20:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-017-9996-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.