IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v20y2018i1d10.1007_s10668-016-9881-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal approach to sustainability of future decision makers: a Hungarian case

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolett Deutsch

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

  • László Berényi

    (University of Miskolc)

Abstract

Several studies deal with the description and categorization of perception of corporate social responsibility. Focusing on university students contributes to the development of proper education and business strategies for increasing social responsibility. Besides exploring the differences in personal attitudes by socio-demographic characteristics, it is essential to understand the common influential factors behind the perceptions and attitudes related to the field. This paper explores the perceptions of Hungarian university students related to sustainability and CSR and aims at detecting the most important factors which influence these perceptions based on a data set of 397 higher education students from three Hungarian universities. The differences in students’ perceptions between subsamples by gender, university and CSR-related knowledge were detected by nonlinear canonical correlation analysis. Key findings suggest that females have a more sensitive approach to environmental and social problems, and a greater trust in CSR than males as opposed to male students with a more techno-optimistic view. Impacts of CSR-related studies and institutional background of universities on students’ perceptions are also highlighted. Common latent influential factors affecting students’ perceptions were explored and illustrated graphically by multidimensional scaling methodology. The two-dimensional solutions of the method show that students’ perceptions associated with sustainability, CSR, environmental impacts of industries and the presence of global problems are influenced by two latent but identifiable dimensions separately; however, the weights of dimensions differ by gender, academic background and former CSR studies of the individuals of students. We can conclude that understanding these common factors and their importance could contribute to an appropriate and comprehensive development of CSR education.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolett Deutsch & László Berényi, 2018. "Personal approach to sustainability of future decision makers: a Hungarian case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 271-303, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-016-9881-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-016-9881-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-016-9881-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-016-9881-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eddy Ng & Ronald Burke, 2010. "Predictor of Business Students’ Attitudes Toward Sustainable Business Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 603-615, September.
    2. Manuel Castelo Branco & Catarina Delgado, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Education and Research in Portuguese Business Schools," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Duygu Turker & Ceren Altuntas & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Social Responsibility Education Across Europe, pages 207-227, Springer.
    3. Gavin Price & Andries Walt, 2013. "Changes in Attitudes Towards Business Ethics Held by Former South African Business Management Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 429-440, March.
    4. Robert Kolodinsky & Timothy Madden & Daniel Zisk & Eric Henkel, 2010. "Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 167-181, January.
    5. Ma. González-Rodríguez & Ma. Díaz-Fernández & Biagio Simonetti, 2013. "Corporative social responsibilities perceptions: an aproximation through Spanish university students’ values," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2379-2398, June.
    6. Anna-Maija Lämsä & Meri Vehkaperä & Tuomas Puttonen & Hanna-Leena Pesonen, 2008. "Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 45-58, September.
    7. van der Burg, Eeke & de Leeuw, Jan & Dijksterhuis, Garmt, 1994. "OVERALS : Nonlinear canonical correlation with k sets of variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 141-163, August.
    8. N/A, 2011. "Sustainable Consumption," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 5(2), pages 164-164, September.
    9. Panwar, Rajat & Han, Xiaoou & Hansen, Eric, 2010. "A demographic examination of societal views regarding corporate social responsibility in the US forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 121-128, February.
    10. Byung Wook Lee & Kenneth Green, 1994. "Towards commercial and environmental excellence: A green portfolio matrix," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 1-9.
    11. Maria Anne Schmidt & Daniel Cracau, 2015. "Cross-Country Comparison of the Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation in Germany and Qatar: An Empirical Study among Business Students," FEMM Working Papers 150006, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    12. Paul Dunn & Anamitra Shome, 2009. "Cultural Crossvergence and Social Desirability Bias: Ethical Evaluations by Chinese and Canadian Business Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 527-543, April.
    13. Nabil Ibrahim & Donald Howard & John Angelidis, 2008. "The Relationship between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are there Differences Between Business Managers and Students?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 165-174, March.
    14. Belal A. Kaifi & Nile M. Khanfar & Ahmad O. Noor & Laura Poluka, 2014. "International Business Students¡¯ Understanding, Perception, and Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study Based Upon Gender, Generational Affiliation, and Culture," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 34-42, September.
    15. Réka Jablonkai, 2016. "Social Responsibility Education in the Hungarian Context," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Duygu Turker & Ceren Altuntas & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Social Responsibility Education Across Europe, pages 91-114, Springer.
    16. Lentner, Csaba & Szegedi, Krisztina & Tatay, Tibor, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Sector," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 60(1), pages 95-103.
    17. Yosef Jabareen, 2008. "A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-192, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Milovan Kovač, 2023. "Assessment of city logistics initiative categories sustainability: case of Belgrade," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1383-1419, February.
    2. Wei Wang & Ziyuan Sun & Weixing Zhu & Lin Ma & Yuting Dong & Xiao Sun & Fengzhi Wu, 2023. "How does multi‐agent govern corporate greenwashing? A stakeholder engagement perspective from “common” to “collaborative” governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 291-307, January.
    3. Lorenz Probst, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence 2013–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Annor Silva Junior & Priscilla Oliveira Martins-Silva & Katia Cyrlene Araújo Vasconcelos & Vitor Correa Silva & José Michel Rocha Monteiro & Sarah Luiza Martins Silva Brito & Tássia Calile Souza Santo, 2021. "Sustainability for Brazilian management students: integrity and opportunism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1292-1315, February.
    5. Yongcheng Wang & Yiik Diew Wong & Kelvin Goh, 2021. "Perceived importance of inclusive street dimensions: a public questionnaire survey from a vision(ing) perspective," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 699-721, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pätäri, S. & Arminen, H. & Albareda, L. & Puumalainen, K. & Toppinen, A., 2017. "Student values and perceptions of corporate social responsibility in the forest industry on the road to a bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 201-215.
    2. Francisca Castilla-Polo & María Consuelo Ruiz-Rodríguez & Alonso Moreno & Ana Licerán-Gutiérrez & Macario Cámara de la Fuente & Eva Chamorro Rufián & Manuel Cano-Rodríguez, 2020. "Classroom Learning and the Perception of Social Responsibility Amongst Graduate Students of Management Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Larrán, Manuel & Andrades, Javier & Herrera, Jesús, 2018. "An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 196-205.
    4. Dominik Aaken & Florian Buchner, 2020. "Religion and CSR: a systematic literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 917-945, June.
    5. László Berényi, 2023. "Relative Importance of Sustainable Development Goals by Q-Sort Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Davide Secchi & Hong T. M. Bui, 2018. "Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 725-746, May.
    7. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Mehrdokht Pournader & Jennifer S. A. Leigh, 2022. "Responsible Management Education as Socialization: Business Students’ Values, Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 17-35, February.
    8. Mladen Koljatic & Monica Silva, 2015. "Do Business Schools Influence Students’ Awareness of Social Issues? Evidence from Two of Chile’s Leading MBA Programs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 595-604, October.
    9. Mohsin Abdur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif & Michela Mingione, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (CSRS) Initiatives among European and Asian Business Schools: A Web-based Content Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1231-1247, October.
    10. Maurice J. Murphy & Jason B. MacDonald & Giselle E. Antoine & Jan M. Smolarski, 2019. "Exploring Muslim Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility: Are Saudi Business Students Different?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1103-1118, February.
    11. Marija Ham & Ana Pap & Helena Stimac, 2019. "Intention to Implement Corporate Social Responsibility – The Role of Religiousness and Ethical Idealism," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 18-30.
    12. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    13. Huilian Han & Hui Li, 2020. "Coupling Coordination Evaluation between Population and Land Urbanization in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    15. María Del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach, 2019. "Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross‐national analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 238-247, January.
    16. Sebastian Hoffmann, 2019. "The Euro in Historical Comparison to the Ruble and the Influence of Overconfidence," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    17. Giovanni Azzone & Giuliano Noci & Raffaella Manzini & Richard Welford & C. William Young, 1996. "Defining Environmental Performance Indicators: An Integrated Framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 69-80, June.
    18. Lee, Eun Mi & Park, Seong-Yeon & Rapert, Molly I. & Newman, Christopher L., 2012. "Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1558-1564.
    19. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    20. Andrey Zahariev & Petya Ivanova & Galina Zaharieva & Krasimira Slaveva & Margarita Mihaylova & Tanya Todorova, 2023. "Interplay between CSR and the Digitalisation of Bulgarian Financial Enterprises: HRM Approach and Pandemic Evidence," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-016-9881-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.