IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v12y2010i2p121-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A demographic examination of societal views regarding corporate social responsibility in the US forest products industry

Author

Listed:
  • Panwar, Rajat
  • Han, Xiaoou
  • Hansen, Eric

Abstract

As corporate social responsibility (CSR) becomes an increasingly mainstream proposition for business organizations, it is becoming increasingly important to develop sector-specific knowledge as well as to explore different aspects of this concept. Adopting an issues management approach, we have discussed that understanding perceptions and expectations of various demographic segments about business performance along relevant social and environmental issues is a research gap in the broader field of CSR. This is particularly true for forest products industry in the US where there is very little research done in the field. For filling this gap, data was collected from the residents within the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana. Results indicate that varying degrees of differences exist in different demographic categories (gender, education level, place of residence, and age). These results have important implications for the US forest products sector, especially as companies formulate their socio-environmental strategy and communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Panwar, Rajat & Han, Xiaoou & Hansen, Eric, 2010. "A demographic examination of societal views regarding corporate social responsibility in the US forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 121-128, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:2:p:121-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(09)00118-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    2. Zimmer, Mary R. & Stafford, Thomas F. & Stafford, Marla Royne, 1994. "Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 63-74, May.
    3. Orts, Eric W. & Strudler, Alan, 2002. "The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 215-233, April.
    4. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Bohlen, Greg M., 2003. "Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 465-480, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng Guping & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Peng Wan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu & Talles Vianna Brugni, 2020. "Do Board Gender Diversity and Non-Executive Directors Affect CSR Reporting? Insight from Agency Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Yanli Li & Lan Gao, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Forestry Companies in China: An Analysis of Contents, Levels, Strategies, and Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Won‐Moo Hur & Hanna Kim & Joon Hyo Jang, 2016. "The Role of Gender Differences in the Impact of CSR Perceptions on Corporate Marketing Outcomes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 345-357, November.
    4. Yiming Zhuang & Xinyue Chang & Younggeun Lee, 2018. "Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Nikolett Deutsch & László Berényi, 2018. "Personal approach to sustainability of future decision makers: a Hungarian case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 271-303, February.
    6. Ranacher, L. & Lähtinen, K. & Järvinen, E. & Toppinen, A., 2017. "Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 180-189.
    7. Robby Soetanto & Aaron Mullins & Nebil Achour, 2017. "The perceptions of social responsibility for community resilience to flooding: the impact of past experience, age, gender and ethnicity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1105-1126, April.
    8. Natasha Haruka Collins & Courtney A. Schultz, 2021. "Why companies fund climate change projects on national forests: insights into the motivations of the Forest Service’s corporate partners," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Li, N. & Toppinen, A., 2011. "Corporate responsibility and sustainable competitive advantage in forest-based industry: Complementary or conflicting goals?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 113-123.
    10. Odia J.O. & Imagbe V.U., 2015. "Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures, Corporate Social and Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in Nigeria: A Simultaneous Equation Approach," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 5(9), pages 615-627.
    11. Pätäri, S. & Arminen, H. & Albareda, L. & Puumalainen, K. & Toppinen, A., 2017. "Student values and perceptions of corporate social responsibility in the forest industry on the road to a bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 201-215.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galbreath, Jeremy, 2017. "Drivers Of Environmental Sustainability In Wine Firms: The Role And Effect Of Women In Leadership," Working Papers 253851, American Association of Wine Economists.
    2. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    3. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    4. Hassan Harajli & Ali Chalak, 2019. "Willingness to Pay for Energy Efficient Appliances: The Case of Lebanese Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Calderon-Monge, Esther & Pastor-Sanz, Ivan & Sendra Garcia, F. Javier, 2020. "Analysis of sustainable consumer behavior as a business opportunity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 74-81.
    6. Ulf Richter, 2010. "Liberal Thought in Reasoning on CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 625-649, December.
    7. Saayman, Melville & Krugell, Waldo F. & Saayman, Andrea, 2016. "Willingness to pay: Who are the cheap talkers?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-111.
    8. Edwin Chukwuemeka Idoko & Chukwunonso Oraedu & Christian Chidera Ugwuanyi & Stephen Ikechukwu Ukenna, 2021. "Determinants of Smart Meter on Sustainable Energy Consumption Behavior: A Developing Country Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    9. Leanne Johnstone, 2018. "Environmental management decisions in CSR‐based accounting research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1212-1222, November.
    10. Kyuhyeon Joo & Jinsoo Hwang, 2023. "Do Consumers Intend to Use Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants for a Sustainable Future? The Influence of Cognitive Drivers on Behavioral Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Ghimire, Ramesh & Green, Gary T. & Poudyal, Neelam C. & Cordell, H. Ken, 2014. "Do Outdoor Recreation Participants Place their Lands in Conservation Easements?," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162451, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. Bauer, Hans H. & Heinrich, Daniel & Schäfer, Daniela B., 2013. "The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1035-1043.
    13. Christina Deselaers & Alina Dahmen & Sonia Lippke, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on CSR Activities of Healthcare Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Jeremy Galbreath & Daniel Tisch, 2022. "Sustainable development in the wine industry: The impact of the natural environment and gender‐diverse leadership," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1869-1881, December.
    15. Y. Fassin, 2008. "The Stakeholder Model Refined," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/529, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. Sang‐June Park & Sungchul Choi & Eun‐Jeong Kim, 2012. "The Relationships between Socio‐demographic Variables and Concerns about Environmental Sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 343-354, November.
    17. Ipek Altinbasak-Farina & Gozde Guleryuz-Turkel, 2016. "How do consumers perceive the socially responsible activities of corporations: An emerging country?s perspective," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 4406923, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    18. Carson Young, 2019. "Putting the Law in Its Place: Business Ethics and the Assumption that Illegal Implies Unethical," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 35-51, November.
    19. Fontes Eva & Moreira António C. & Carlos Vera, 2021. "The influence of ecological concern on green purchase behavior," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 246-267, September.
    20. Michelle Bonera & Anna Paola Codini & Giulia Miniero, 2020. "The great Millennials’ trouble: leading or confused green generation? An Italian insight," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(4), pages 289-308, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:2:p:121-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.