IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v58y2014i3p757-779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation aspects of interactive multiobjective optimization for modeling environments: the case of GAMS-NIMBUS

Author

Listed:
  • Vesa Ojalehto
  • Kaisa Miettinen
  • Timo Laukkanen

Abstract

Interactive multiobjective optimization methods have provided promising results in the literature but still their implementations are rare. Here we introduce a core structure of interactive methods to enable their convenient implementation. We also demonstrate how this core structure can be applied when implementing an interactive method using a modeling environment. Many modeling environments contain tools for single objective optimization but not for interactive multiobjective optimization. Furthermore, as a concrete example, we present GAMS-NIMBUS Tool which is an implementation of the classification-based NIMBUS method for the GAMS modeling environment. So far, interactive methods have not been available in the GAMS environment, but with the GAMS-NIMBUS Tool we open up the possibility of solving multiobjective optimization problems modeled in the GAMS modeling environment. Finally, we give some examples of the benefits of applying an interactive method by using the GAMS-NIMBUS Tool for solving multiobjective optimization problems modeled in the GAMS environment. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Vesa Ojalehto & Kaisa Miettinen & Timo Laukkanen, 2014. "Implementation aspects of interactive multiobjective optimization for modeling environments: the case of GAMS-NIMBUS," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 757-779, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:58:y:2014:i:3:p:757-779
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-014-9639-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10589-014-9639-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-014-9639-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz & Jana Ries (ed.), 2010. "New Developments in Multiple Objective and Goal Programming," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-642-10354-4, December.
    2. Henri Ruotsalainen & Kaisa Miettinen & Jan-Erik Palmgren, 2010. "Interactive Multiobjective Optimization for 3D HDR Brachytherapy Applying IND-NIMBUS," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz & Jana Ries (ed.), New Developments in Multiple Objective and Goal Programming, pages 117-131, Springer.
    3. Kaliszewski, Ignacy, 2004. "Out of the mist--towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 293-307, October.
    4. Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque & Kaisa Miettinen, 2012. "Improving the computational efficiency in a global formulation (GLIDE) for interactive multiobjective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 47-70, August.
    5. Stam, Antonie & Kuula, Markku & Cesar, Herman, 1992. "Transboundary air pollution in Europe: An interactive multicriteria tradeoff analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 263-277, January.
    6. Markus Hartikainen & Kaisa Miettinen & Margaret Wiecek, 2012. "PAINT: Pareto front interpolation for nonlinear multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 845-867, July.
    7. Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano, 2010. "NAUTILUS method: An interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the nadir point," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 426-434, October.
    8. J.P. Hämäläinen & K. Miettinen & P. Tarvainen & J. Toivanen, 2003. "Interactive Solution Approach to a Multiobjective Optimization Problem in a Paper Machine Headbox Design," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 265-281, February.
    9. Nakayama, Hirotaka & Kaneshige, Kazuyoshi & Takemoto, Shinji & Watada, Yasuo, 1995. "An application of a multi-objective programming technique to construction accuracy control of cable-stayed bridges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 731-738, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Zhou-Kangas & Kaisa Miettinen & Karthik Sindhya, 2019. "Solving multiobjective optimization problems with decision uncertainty: an interactive approach," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 25-51, February.
    2. Zengliang Han & Dongqing Wang & Feng Liu & Zhiyong Zhao, 2017. "Multi-AGV path planning with double-path constraints by using an improved genetic algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaisa Miettinen & Dmitry Podkopaev & Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque, 2015. "A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 633-652, December.
    2. Ruiz, Ana B. & Sindhya, Karthik & Miettinen, Kaisa & Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano, 2015. "E-NAUTILUS: A decision support system for complex multiobjective optimization problems based on the NAUTILUS method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 218-231.
    3. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    4. J. Cabello & M. Luque & F. Miguel & A. Ruiz & F. Ruiz, 2014. "A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain)," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, April.
    5. El Mehdi, Er Raqabi & Ilyas, Himmich & Nizar, El Hachemi & Issmaïl, El Hallaoui & François, Soumis, 2023. "Incremental LNS framework for integrated production, inventory, and vessel scheduling: Application to a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Saeed Vasebi & Yeganeh M. Hayeri, 2021. "Collective Driving to Mitigate Climate Change: Collective-Adaptive Cruise Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    8. Rastegar, Narges & Khorram, Esmaile, 2014. "A combined scalarizing method for multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 229-237.
    9. Boucekkine, Raouf & Fabbri, Giorgio & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto, 2021. "From firm to global-level pollution control: The case of transboundary pollution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 331-345.
    10. Oliver Stein & Maximilian Volk, 2023. "Generalized Polarity and Weakest Constraint Qualifications in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 1156-1190, September.
    11. Alberto Pajares & Xavier Blasco & Juan Manuel Herrero & Miguel A. Martínez, 2021. "A Comparison of Archiving Strategies for Characterization of Nearly Optimal Solutions under Multi-Objective Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Gabriele Eichfelder & Corinna Krüger & Anita Schöbel, 2017. "Decision uncertainty in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 485-510, October.
    13. Morovati, Vahid & Pourkarimi, Latif, 2019. "Extension of Zoutendijk method for solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 44-57.
    14. Ana B. Ruiz & Francisco Ruiz & Kaisa Miettinen & Laura Delgado-Antequera & Vesa Ojalehto, 2019. "NAUTILUS Navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 213-231, June.
    15. Francisco Salas-Molina & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar & Pablo Díaz-García, 2018. "Selecting cash management models from a multiobjective perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 275-288, February.
    16. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    17. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Boucekkine, Raouf & Fabbri, Giorgio & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto, 2021. "From firm to global-level pollution control: The case of transboundary pollution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 331-345.
    19. Mitrović, Sandra & Baesens, Bart & Lemahieu, Wilfried & De Weerdt, Jochen, 2018. "On the operational efficiency of different feature types for telco Churn prediction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1141-1155.
    20. Kalyan Shankar Bhattacharjee & Hemant Kumar Singh & Tapabrata Ray, 2017. "An approach to generate comprehensive piecewise linear interpolation of pareto outcomes to aid decision making," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 71-93, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:58:y:2014:i:3:p:757-779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.