IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v10y2017i2d10.1007_s12187-016-9375-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looked after Children and Young People in England: Developing Measures of Subjective Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • J. Selwyn

    (University of Bristol)

  • M. Wood

    (University of Bristol)

  • T. Newman

    (Timmus Limited)

Abstract

In England, about 69,000 children and young people are in care, primarily because of abuse and neglect. The impact of maltreatment can be long lasting and the quality of substitute care the child receives has a significant impact on children’s developmental recovery. Yet little is known about how looked after children and young people view their own well-being. Do they identify the same elements as important to their wellbeing as do children in general population and how might their well-being be measured? Here, we describe the development of an on-line survey to measure the subjective well-being of children in care. Eighteen focus groups were held involving 140 children and young people to understand their perceptions of what was important to their wellbeing. Although there were domains of well-being, such as the importance of relationships, that were held in common with children in the general population, looked after children identified other domains and their emphasis differed. Children emphasised the importance of relationships with foster carers, social workers and siblings and of being able to trust the adults in their lives. Unlike children in the general population, looked after children thought that having a coherent account of their histories and knowing the reason for being in care was crucial. The study demonstrated that children as young as 6 years old were able to provide meaningful responses about their well-being. The challenge for practice is to respond to those views and not leave children disillusioned that their views have made no difference.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Selwyn & M. Wood & T. Newman, 2017. "Looked after Children and Young People in England: Developing Measures of Subjective Well-Being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(2), pages 363-380, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:10:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-016-9375-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-016-9375-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-016-9375-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-016-9375-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ward, Harriet, 2011. "Continuities and discontinuities: Issues concerning the establishment of a persistent sense of self amongst care leavers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2512-2518.
    2. Liliana Fernandes & Américo Mendes & Aurora Teixeira, 2012. "A Review Essay on the Measurement of Child Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 239-257, April.
    3. Natacha Borgers & Dirk Sikkel & Joop Hox, 2004. "Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 17-33, February.
    4. Llosada-Gistau, Joan & Montserrat, Carme & Casas, Ferran, 2015. "The subjective well-being of adolescents in residential care compared to that of the general population," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 150-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bakketeig, Elisiv & Boddy, Janet & Gundersen, Tonje & Østergaard, Jeanette & Hanrahan, Fidelma, 2020. "Deconstructing doing well; what can we learn from care experienced young people in England, Denmark and Norway?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Coral Gallardo-Masa & Rosa Sitjes-Figueras & Edgar Iglesias & Carme Montserrat, 2024. "How Adolescents in Residential Care Perceive their Skills and Satisfaction with Life: Do Adolescents and Youth Workers Agree?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 261-287, February.
    3. Mary F. Zhang & Julie Selwyn, 2020. "The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1549-1572, October.
    4. Paolo Raciti & Paloma Vivaldi Vera, 2019. "A Proposal for Measuring Children Emotional Well-Being within an Anti-Poverty Measure in Italy: Psychometric Characteristics and Comparative Verification of Results," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(4), pages 1187-1219, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William P. O’Hare, 2016. "A State Level Assessment of the Well-Being of Black Children in the United States," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(1), pages 277-297, March.
    2. Eirini Leriou, 2023. "Understanding and Measuring Child Well-being in the Region of Attica, Greece: Round Five," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(4), pages 1395-1451, August.
    3. Ya-Ju Chang & Annekatrin Lehmann & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2017. "Screening Indicators for the Sustainable Child Development Index (SCDI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Heleen van der Meulen & Rinaldo Kühne & Suzanna J. Opree, 2018. "Validating the Material Values Scale for Children (MVS-c) for Use in Early Childhood," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1201-1216, August.
    5. Miroslav Verbič & Nela Kačmarčik-Maduna, 2018. "Child Well-being in Transition Countries as an Intergenerational Investment in the Development of Human Capital," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1077-1105, August.
    6. Orúzar, Harry & Miranda, Rafael & Oriol, Xavier & Montserrat, Carme, 2019. "Self-control and subjective-wellbeing of adolescents in residential care: The moderator role of experienced happiness and daily-life activities with caregivers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 125-131.
    7. Costa, Mónica & Tagliabue, Semira & Matos, Paula Mena & Mota, Catarina Pinheiro, 2020. "Stability and change in adolescents’ well-being: The role of relationships with caregivers in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Gairal-Casadó, Regina & Garcia-Yeste, Carme & Novo-Molinero, Maria Teresa & Salvadó-Belarta, Zoel, 2019. "Out of school learning scientific workshops: Stimulating institutionalized Adolescents' educational aspirations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 116-126.
    9. Cho, Esther Yin-Nei & Yu, Fuk-Yuen, 2020. "A review of measurement tools for child wellbeing," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Mònica González-Carrasco & Ferran Casas & Sara Malo & Ferran Viñas & Tamar Dinisman, 2017. "Changes with Age in Subjective Well-Being Through the Adolescent Years: Differences by Gender," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 63-88, February.
    11. Elena Bárcena-Martín & Maite Blázquez & Santiago Budría & Ana I. Moro-Egido, 2017. "Child and Household Deprivation: A Relationship Beyond Household Socio-demographic Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1079-1098, July.
    12. Ya-Ju Chang & Annekatrin Lehmann & Lisa Winter & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "The Sustainable Child Development Index (SCDI) for Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Joan Llosada-Gistau & Ferran Casas & Carme Montserrat, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Subjective Well-Being of Adolescents in out-of-Home Care. A Mixed Method Study," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 835-863, July.
    14. Harder, Annemiek T. & Mann-Feder, Varda & Oterholm, Inger & Refaeli, Tehila, 2020. "Supporting transitions to adulthood for youth leaving care: Consensus based principles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Sulimani-Aidan, Yafit, 2017. "To dream the impossible dream: Care leavers' challenges and barriers in pursuing their future expectations and goals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 332-339.
    16. Eirini Leriou & Andreas Kollias & Anna Anastasopoulou & Aristeidis Katranis, 2022. "Understanding and Measuring Child Well-Being in the Region of Attica, Greece: Round Three," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(4), pages 1295-1311, August.
    17. Garcia-Molsosa, Marta & Collet-Sabé, Jordi & Martori, Joan Carles & Montserrat, Carme, 2019. "School satisfaction among youth in residential care: A multi-source analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Maria Aymerich & Ferran Casas, 2020. "A contextualized measure of Overall Life Satisfaction among adolescents: differences by gender," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(6), pages 2241-2260, December.
    19. Caiquan Bai & Yuan Gong & Chen Feng, 2019. "Social Trust, Pattern of Difference, and Subjective Well-Being," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    20. Zárate-Alva, Nair Elizabeth & Sala-Roca, Josefina, 2019. "Socio-emotional skills of girls and young mothers in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 50-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:10:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-016-9375-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.