IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v18y2020i5d10.1007_s40258-020-00572-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Ann-Kathrin Heider

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU))

  • Harald Mang

    (Universitätsklinikum Erlangen)

Abstract

Background Reimbursement systems that contribute to the cooperation and integration of providers have become increasingly important within the healthcare sector. Reimbursement systems not only serve as payment mechanisms but also provide control and incentive functions. Thus, the design of reimbursement systems is extremely important. Objectives The aims of this systematic review were to describe and gain a better understanding of the effects of monetary incentives in the setting of physician groups. Methods In January 2020, we searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, and ISI Web of Science databases as well as the gray literature and authors’ personal collections. Results We included 21 reviews containing seven different incentive schemes/initiatives. The study settings and outcome measures varied considerably, as did the results within the incentive schemes and initiatives. However, we found positive effects on process quality for two types of incentives: pay-for-performance and accountable care organizations. The main limitations of this review were the variations in study settings and outcome measures of the studies included. Conclusions Monetary incentives in healthcare are often implemented as a control measure and are supposed to increase quality of care and reduce costs. The heterogeneity of the study results indicates that this is not always successful. The results reveal a need for research into the effects of monetary incentives in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann-Kathrin Heider & Harald Mang, 2020. "Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 655-667, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:18:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00572-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00572-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-020-00572-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-020-00572-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen J. Mullen & Richard G. Frank & Meredith B. Rosenthal, 2010. "Can you get what you pay for? Pay‐for‐performance and the quality of healthcare providers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 64-91, March.
    2. Kathleen J. Mullen & Richard G. Frank & Meredith B. Rosenthal, 2010. "Can you get what you pay for? Pay-for-performance and the quality of healthcare providers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, pages 64-91.
    3. Bryan A Loy & Clive I Shkedy & Adam C Powell & Laura E Happe & Julie A Royalty & Michael T Miao & Gary L Smith & James W Long & Amit K Gupta, 2016. "Do Case Rates Affect Physicians' Clinical Practice in Radiation Oncology?: An Observational Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Wranik, Wiesława Dominika & Price, Sheri & Haydt, Susan M. & Edwards, Jeanette & Hatfield, Krista & Weir, Julie & Doria, Nicole, 2019. "Implications of interprofessional primary care team characteristics for health services and patient health outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(6), pages 550-563.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 19th October 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-10-19 11:00:05

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nasrin Shaarbafchizadeh & Mostafa Amini‐Rarani & Farzaneh Mohammadi, 2021. "Resource generation challenges for burn care in Iran," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1600-1612, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lewis, Maureen & Pettersson, Gunilla, 2009. "Governance in health care delivery : raising performance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5074, The World Bank.
    2. Lorens A. Helmchen & Anthony T. Lo Sasso, 2010. "How sensitive is physician performance to alternative compensation schedules? Evidence from a large network of primary care clinics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(11), pages 1300-1317, November.
    3. Taylor J. Christensen, 2016. "A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 175-187, June.
    4. C. Kirabo Jackson & Henry S. Schneider, 2013. "Reducing Moral Hazard in Employment Relationships: Experimental Evidence on Managerial Control and Performance Pay," NBER Working Papers 19645, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Susan Feng Lu, 2012. "Multitasking, Information Disclosure, and Product Quality: Evidence from Nursing Homes," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 673-705, September.
    6. Michele Fioretti & Hongming Wang, 2020. "Performance Pay in Insurance Markets: Evidence from Medicare," Working Papers 2020.03, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    7. Simon Burgess & Carol Propper & Marisa Ratto & Emma Tominey, 2017. "Incentives in the Public Sector: Evidence from a Government Agency," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 117-141, October.
    8. Sun-Moon Jung & Jae Yong Shin, 2022. "Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7631-7657, October.
    9. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2014. "Physician Response To Pay‐For‐Performance: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(8), pages 962-978, August.
    10. Cadena, Brian C. & Smith, Austin C., 2022. "Performance pay, productivity, and strategic opt-out: Evidence from a community health center," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Houyuan Jiang & Zhan Pang & Sergei Savin, 2012. "Performance-Based Contracts for Outpatient Medical Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 654-669, October.
    12. Cox, James C. & Sadiraj, Vjollca & Schnier, Kurt E. & Sweeney, John F., 2016. "Incentivizing cost-effective reductions in hospital readmission rates," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PB), pages 24-35.
    13. Elise Huillery & Juliette Seban, 2015. "Financial Incentives are Counterproductive in Non-Profit Sectors: Evidence from a Health Experiment," Working Papers hal-01164460, HAL.
    14. Fuhai Hong & Tanjim Hossain & John A. List & Migiwa Tanaka, 2018. "Testing The Theory Of Multitasking: Evidence From A Natural Field Experiment In Chinese Factories," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 511-536, May.
    15. Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Weijie Yan, 2019. "Antibacterial resistance and the cost of affecting demand: the case of UK antibiotics," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2019-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    16. Richard G. Frank, 2005. "The health care challenge: some perspectives from behavioral economics," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 50(Jun), pages 61-75.
    17. Elise Huillery & Juliette Seban, 2015. "Financial Incentives are Counterproductive in Non-Profit Sectors: Evidence from a Health Experiment," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01164460, HAL.
    18. Henry Eyring, 2020. "Disclosing Physician Ratings: Performance Effects and the Difficulty of Altering Ratings Consensus," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1023-1067, September.
    19. Allin, Sara & Martin, Elisabeth & Rudoler, David & Church Carson, Michael & Grudniewicz, Agnes & Jopling, Sydney & Strumpf, Erin, 2021. "Comparing public policies impacting prescribing and medication management in primary care in two Canadian provinces," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(9), pages 1121-1130.
    20. Ramerman, Lotte & Hek, Karin & Cramer- van der Welle, Christine & Simons-Winters, Ellis & Middelweerd, Anouk & Lambooij, Anke & Verheij, Robert, 2022. "Incentivizing appropriate prescribing in primary care: Development and first results of an electronic health record-based pay-for-performance scheme," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 1010-1017.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:18:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00572-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.