IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v126y2022i10p1010-1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentivizing appropriate prescribing in primary care: Development and first results of an electronic health record-based pay-for-performance scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Ramerman, Lotte
  • Hek, Karin
  • Cramer- van der Welle, Christine
  • Simons-Winters, Ellis
  • Middelweerd, Anouk
  • Lambooij, Anke
  • Verheij, Robert

Abstract

Part of the funding of Dutch General Practitioners (GPs) care is based on pay-for-performance, including an incentive for appropriate prescribing according to guidelines in national formularies. Aim of this paper is to describe the development of an indicator and an infrastructure based on prescription data from GP Electronic Health Records (EHR), to assess the level of adherence to formularies and the effects of the pay-for-performance scheme, thereby assessing the usefulness of the infrastructure and the indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramerman, Lotte & Hek, Karin & Cramer- van der Welle, Christine & Simons-Winters, Ellis & Middelweerd, Anouk & Lambooij, Anke & Verheij, Robert, 2022. "Incentivizing appropriate prescribing in primary care: Development and first results of an electronic health record-based pay-for-performance scheme," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 1010-1017.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:10:p:1010-1017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851022001877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen J. Mullen & Richard G. Frank & Meredith B. Rosenthal, 2010. "Can you get what you pay for? Pay‐for‐performance and the quality of healthcare providers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 64-91, March.
    2. Lina Maria Ellegård & Jens Dietrichson & Anders Anell, 2018. "Can pay‐for‐performance to primary care providers stimulate appropriate use of antibiotics?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 39-54, January.
    3. F. P. Vlaanderen & M. A. Tanke & B. R. Bloem & M. J. Faber & F. Eijkenaar & F. T. Schut & P. P. T. Jeurissen, 2019. "Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(2), pages 217-232, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Feng Lu, 2012. "Multitasking, Information Disclosure, and Product Quality: Evidence from Nursing Homes," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 673-705, September.
    2. Michele Fioretti & Hongming Wang, 2020. "Performance Pay in Insurance Markets: Evidence from Medicare," Working Papers 2020.03, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    3. Simon Burgess & Carol Propper & Marisa Ratto & Emma Tominey, 2017. "Incentives in the Public Sector: Evidence from a Government Agency," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 117-141, October.
    4. Sun-Moon Jung & Jae Yong Shin, 2022. "Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7631-7657, October.
    5. Fuhai Hong & Tanjim Hossain & John A. List & Migiwa Tanaka, 2018. "Testing The Theory Of Multitasking: Evidence From A Natural Field Experiment In Chinese Factories," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 511-536, May.
    6. Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Weijie Yan, 2019. "Antibacterial resistance and the cost of affecting demand: the case of UK antibiotics," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2019-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    7. Richard G. Frank, 2005. "The health care challenge: some perspectives from behavioral economics," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 50(Jun), pages 61-75.
    8. Henry Eyring, 2020. "Disclosing Physician Ratings: Performance Effects and the Difficulty of Altering Ratings Consensus," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1023-1067, September.
    9. Lorens A. Helmchen & Anthony T. Lo Sasso, 2010. "How sensitive is physician performance to alternative compensation schedules? Evidence from a large network of primary care clinics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(11), pages 1300-1317, November.
    10. Michele Fioretti & Hongming Wang, 2019. "Subsidizing Inequality: Performance Pay and Risk Selection in Medicare," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03393070, HAL.
    11. Lina Maria Ellegård, 2020. "Effects of pay-for-performance on prescription of hypertension drugs among public and private primary care providers in Sweden," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 215-228, September.
    12. Grant Miller & Kimberly Singer Babiarz, 2013. "Pay-for-Performance Incentives in Low- and Middle-Income Country Health Programs," NBER Working Papers 18932, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/58ao15vh3t9tvakcshade02eov is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Nasina Mat Desa & Muhammad Hasmi Abu Hassan Asaari, 2021. "Pay for Performance, Performance Management, and Internal Promotional Opportunities of Human Resource Practices with Job Performance," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-49, July.
    15. Alex Proshin & Lise Rochaix & Adrian Rohit Dass & Audrey Laporte, 2020. "Impact of Quality-based Procedures on orthopedic care quantity and quality in Ontario Hospitals," PSE Working Papers halshs-02872219, HAL.
    16. Anell, Anders & Dietrichson, Jens & Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav, 2021. "Information, switching costs, and consumer choice: Evidence from two randomised field experiments in Swedish primary health care," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Mylène Lagarde & Duane Blaauw, 2021. "Effects of incentive framing on performance and effort: evidence from a medically framed experiment," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 33-48, September.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4bg68glinb8r8roh0akvprtu9u is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Groß, Mona & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Wiesen, Daniel, 2021. "Physicians' incentives, patients' characteristics, and quality of care: A systematic experimental comparison of fee-for-service, capitation, and pay for performance," Ruhr Economic Papers 923, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Eijkenaar, Frank & Emmert, Martin & Scheppach, Manfred & Schöffski, Oliver, 2013. "Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 115-130.
    21. Shan Huang & Hannes Ullrich, 2023. "Provider effects in antibiotic prescribing: Evidence from physician exits," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0018, Berlin School of Economics.
    22. Chandeni S. Gajadien & Peter J. G. Dohmen & Frank Eijkenaar & Frederik T. Schut & Erik M. Raaij & Richard Heijink, 2023. "Financial risk allocation and provider incentives in hospital–insurer contracts in The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 125-138, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:10:p:1010-1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.