IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v287y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-019-03443-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact approach for the Minimum-Cost Bounded-Error Calibration Tree problem

Author

Listed:
  • Iago A. Carvalho

    (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)

  • Marco A. Ribeiro

    (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)

Abstract

The Minimum-Cost Bounded-Error Calibration Tree problem (MBCT) is a wireless network optimization problem that arises from the sensors’ need of periodical calibration. The MBCT takes into account two objectives. The first is to minimize the communication distance between the network sensors, while the second is to reduce the maximum post-calibration error in the network. In this paper, we propose a mathematical formulation for the MBCT. Furthermore, we solve the problem using two different implementations of an Augmented $$\epsilon $$ϵ-Constraint Method ($$aug\,\epsilon \text {-}CM$$augϵ-CM) that incorporate the proposed formulation. We also employed the Pareto-fronts obtained by $$aug\,\epsilon \text {-}CM$$augϵ-CM to evaluate the Node-depth Phylogenetic-based Non-dominated Sorting Artificial Immune System (NPE-NSAIS), the most recent heuristic in the literature for MBCT. Computational experiments showed that $$aug\,\epsilon \text {-}CM$$augϵ-CM can solve MBCT instances up to 50 nodes. Furthermore, a statistical test demonstrated that the running times of one of the $$aug\,\epsilon \text {-}CM$$augϵ-CM implementations was significantly smaller than those of the other. Finally, we show that NPE-NSAIS solutions are very close to the Pareto-fronts given by $$aug\,\epsilon \text {-}CM$$augϵ-CM, achieving good results on the evaluated metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Iago A. Carvalho & Marco A. Ribeiro, 2020. "An exact approach for the Minimum-Cost Bounded-Error Calibration Tree problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 109-126, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:287:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03443-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03443-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03443-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03443-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    2. Akgün, Ibrahim & Tansel, Barbaros Ç., 2011. "New formulations of the Hop-Constrained Minimum Spanning Tree problem via Miller-Tucker-Zemlin constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 263-276, July.
    3. Hela Masri & Saoussen Krichen, 2018. "Exact and approximate approaches for the Pareto front generation of the single path multicommodity flow problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 353-377, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iago A. Carvalho & Amadeu A. Coco, 2023. "On solving bi-objective constrained minimum spanning tree problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 301-323, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsionas, Mike G., 2019. "Multi-objective optimization using statistical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 364-378.
    2. Hanyu Lu & Lufei Huang, 2021. "Optimization of Shore Power Deployment in Green Ports Considering Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    4. Saeedeh Anvari & Metin Turkay, 2017. "The facility location problem from the perspective of triple bottom line accounting of sustainability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6266-6287, November.
    5. Tobias Kuhn & Stefan Ruzika, 2017. "A coverage-based Box-Algorithm to compute a representation for optimization problems with three objective functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 581-600, March.
    6. Wang, Chen & Zhang, Shenghui & Liao, Peng & Fu, Tonglin, 2022. "Wind speed forecasting based on hybrid model with model selection and wind energy conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 763-781.
    7. Carlos García-Alonso & Leonor Pérez-Naranjo & Juan Fernández-Caballero, 2014. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 187-202, August.
    8. Schmidt, Adam & Albert, Laura A. & Zheng, Kaiyue, 2021. "Risk management for cyber-infrastructure protection: A bi-objective integer programming approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Doğan, Ilgın & Lokman, Banu & Köksalan, Murat, 2022. "Representing the nondominated set in multi-objective mixed-integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 804-818.
    10. van der Plas, C. & Tervonen, T. & Dekker, R., 2012. "Evaluation of scalarization methods and NSGA-II/SPEA2 genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization of green supply chain design," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2012-24, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    11. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    12. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Dzubur, Nada, 2016. "Bi-objective bilevel optimization of distribution center locations considering user equilibria," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-22.
    13. Melih Ozlen & Benjamin A. Burton & Cameron A. G. MacRae, 2014. "Multi-Objective Integer Programming: An Improved Recursive Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 470-482, February.
    14. Chen, Yingzhen & Zhao, Qiuhong & Huang, Kai & Xi, Xunzhuo, 2022. "A Bi-objective optimization model for contract design of humanitarian relief goods procurement considering extreme disasters," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Drexl, Michael & Schneider, Michael, 2015. "A survey of variants and extensions of the location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 283-308.
    16. Walter Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    17. Oylum S¸eker & Mucahit Cevik & Merve Bodur & Young Lee & Mark Ruschin, 2023. "A Multiobjective Approach for Sector Duration Optimization in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 248-264, January.
    18. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    19. Klamroth, Kathrin & Lacour, Renaud & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2015. "On the representation of the search region in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 767-778.
    20. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:287:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03443-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.