IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v273y2019i1d10.1007_s10479-017-2434-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible dynamic sustainable procurement model

Author

Listed:
  • Harpreet Kaur

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

  • Surya Prakash Singh

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

Abstract

Management of global supply chains is a challenging task due to the uncertainties leading to supply chain disruption. This requires the supply chains to be not only effective and efficient but also flexible in their operations to mitigate these disruptions. It has been observed that supply chains are mostly influenced by suppliers and carriers; hence, a business firm needs to be flexible and sustainable in selection of suppliers and carriers to overcome any disruptions. This paper proposes a flexible dynamic sustainable procurement (FDSP) framework for global supply chains by considering not only qualitative parameters such as quality, reliability, social and environmental factors for the selection of suppliers as well as carriers but also taking into account quantitative preferences such as cost, supplier capacity and carrier capacity. However, independently using quantitative parameters might allocate order quantities to the suppliers and carriers which are least preferred based on other qualitative parameters. Therefore, the proposed FDSP model provides flexibility by integrating the quantitative and qualitative parameters to allocate order quantities to suppliers and carriers preferred by both the sets. Hence, the proposed FDSP model provides a range of possible integrated solutions and business firm can select the best suited solution having least deviation. The deviations are computed from integrated optimal solution provided by FDSP and quantitative models. The proposed FDSP model is solved for a case illustration to demonstrate the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Harpreet Kaur & Surya Prakash Singh, 2019. "Flexible dynamic sustainable procurement model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 651-691, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:273:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2434-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2434-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2434-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-017-2434-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ubeda, S. & Arcelus, F.J. & Faulin, J., 2011. "Green logistics at Eroski: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 44-51, May.
    2. Ghodsypour, S. H. & O'Brien, C., 1998. "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 199-212, September.
    3. Arun Kr. Purohit & Devendra Choudhary & Ravi Shankar, 2016. "Inventory lot-sizing with supplier selection under non-stationary stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2459-2469, April.
    4. Handfield, Robert & Walton, Steven V. & Sroufe, Robert & Melnyk, Steven A., 2002. "Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 70-87, August.
    5. Wade D. Cook & Lawrence M. Seiford, 1982. "On the Borda-Kendall Consensus Method for Priority Ranking Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 621-637, June.
    6. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    7. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 43-53, September.
    8. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    9. Retel Helmrich, M. & Jans, R.F. & van den Heuvel, W. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2012. "The Economic Lot-Sizing Problem with an Emission Constraint," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2011-41, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    10. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Russell, Robert A., 2004. "Integrating purchasing and routing in a propane gas supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 710-729, May.
    11. Liao, Zhiying & Rittscher, Jens, 2007. "Integration of supplier selection, procurement lot sizing and carrier selection under dynamic demand conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 502-510, June.
    12. Fangruo Chen & Awi Federgruen & Yu-Sheng Zheng, 2001. "Coordination Mechanisms for a Distribution System with One Supplier and Multiple Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 693-708, May.
    13. Kelle, Peter & Al-khateeb, Faisal & Anders Miller, Pam, 2003. "Partnership and negotiation support by joint optimal ordering/setup policies for JIT," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 431-441, January.
    14. Glock, C. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & El Saadany, A., 2013. "Supply Chain Coordination with Emission Reduction Incentives," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57672, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    15. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    16. Wang, Ge & Huang, Samuel H. & Dismukes, John P., 2004. "Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Swenseth, Scott R. & Godfrey, Michael R., 2002. "Incorporating transportation costs into inventory replenishment decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 113-130, May.
    18. Xia, Weijun & Wu, Zhiming, 2007. "Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 494-504, October.
    19. Zied Jemai & Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Yves Dallery, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," Post-Print hal-01672398, HAL.
    20. Ghodsypour, S. H. & O'Brien, C., 2001. "The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 15-27, August.
    21. Yi-Kuei Lin & Cheng-Ta Yeh, 2013. "Determine the optimal carrier selection for a logistics network based on multi-commodity reliability criterion," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 949-965.
    22. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Dallery, Yves, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 229-240.
    23. Choong Yang & Amelia Regan, 2013. "A multi-criteria decision support methodology for implementing truck operation strategies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 713-728, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rohit Kumar Singh & Sachin Modgil & Padmanav Acharya, 2019. "Assessment of Supply Chain Flexibility Using System Dynamics Modeling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 39-63, December.
    2. Marlies van Tilburg & Harold Krikke & Wim Lambrechts, 2022. "Supply Chain Relationships in Circular Business Models: Supplier Tactics at Royal Smit Transformers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harpreet Kaur & Surya Prakash Singh, 2019. "Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 309-354, December.
    2. Palak, Gökçe & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni & Geunes, Joseph, 2014. "Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 198-216.
    3. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    4. Mukherjee, Krishnendu & Sarkar, Bijon & Bhattacharyya, Ardhendu, 2012. "Supplier selection by F-compromise method: a case study of cement industry of NE India," MPRA Paper 57786, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    5. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    6. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    7. M. Turkensteen (Marcel) & van den Heuvel, W., 2019. "The trade-off between costs and carbon emissions from lot-sizing decisions," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2019-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2015. "Haulage sharing approach to achieve sustainability in material purchasing: New method and numerical applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 308-318.
    9. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    10. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    11. Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan C Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01954465, HAL.
    12. Bozorgi, Ali & Pazour, Jennifer & Nazzal, Dima, 2014. "A new inventory model for cold items that considers costs and emissions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 114-125.
    13. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    14. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    15. Tang, Shaolong & Wang, Wenjie & Cho, Stella & Yan, Hong, 2018. "Reducing emissions in transportation and inventory management: (R, Q) Policy with considerations of carbon reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 327-340.
    16. H. Edwin Romeijn & Dolores Romero Morales & Wilco Van den Heuvel, 2014. "Computational complexity of finding Pareto efficient outcomes for biobjective lot‐sizing models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(5), pages 386-402, August.
    17. Konur, Dinçer, 2017. "Non-collaborative emission targets joining and quantity flow decisions in a Stackelberg setting," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 60-82.
    18. García Alcaraz Jorge Luis & Alvarado Iniesta Alejandro & Maldonado Macías Aidé Araceli, 2013. "Selección de proveedores basada en análisis dimensional," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(3), pages 249-278, julio-sep.
    19. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Supplier selection criteria and methods: past, present and future," MPRA Paper 60079, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:273:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2434-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.