IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v211y2013i1p167-17710.1007-s10479-013-1458-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minmax due-date assignment with a time window for acceptable lead-times

Author

Listed:
  • Enrique Gerstl
  • Gur Mosheiov

Abstract

In a standard DIF due-date assignment model, customers may consider late due-dates as unacceptable, i.e., if a due-date is assigned later than a pre-specified lead time, the supplier is penalized. This note extends this setting by adding a lower bound on the acceptable lead-time, reflecting e.g., the time needed by the customer for preparation of storage space. Thus, in addition to the standard earliness/tardiness penalties of jobs, our model contains penalties for early and tardy due-dates. The objective is of a minmax type, i.e. we try to minimize the highest (job and due-date) cost. An efficient O(n) solution algorithm (where n is the number of jobs) is introduced. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2013. "Minmax due-date assignment with a time window for acceptable lead-times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 167-177, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:211:y:2013:i:1:p:167-177:10.1007/s10479-013-1458-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1458-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1458-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1458-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    2. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    3. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    4. S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith & A. Seidmann, 1982. "Common Due Date Assignment to Minimize Total Penalty for the One Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 391-399, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyu Sun & Xin-Na Geng & Tao Liu, 2020. "Due-window assignment scheduling in the proportionate flow shop setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 113-131, September.
    2. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "Minmax due-date assignment on a two-machine flowshop," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 191-209, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George & Zhang, Rui, 2016. "Optimal coordination of resource allocation, due date assignment and scheduling decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-54.
    2. T C E Cheng & L Kang & C T Ng, 2004. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 198-203, February.
    3. Li, Shisheng & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2011. "Group scheduling and due date assignment on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 230-235, April.
    4. Qian, Jianbo & Steiner, George, 2013. "Fast algorithms for scheduling with learning effects and time-dependent processing times on a single machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 547-551.
    5. Lin, Shih-Wei & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2007. "A sequential exchange approach for minimizing earliness-tardiness penalties of single-machine scheduling with a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1294-1301, March.
    6. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    7. Baruch Mor, 2019. "Minmax scheduling problems with common due-date and completion time penalty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 50-71, July.
    8. Huynh Tuong, Nguyen & Soukhal, Ameur, 2010. "Due dates assignment and JIT scheduling with equal-size jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 280-289, September.
    9. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "Minmax due-date assignment on a two-machine flowshop," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 191-209, October.
    10. Shabtay, Dvir, 2010. "Scheduling and due date assignment to minimize earliness, tardiness, holding, due date assignment and batch delivery costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 235-242, January.
    11. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    12. S.S. Panwalkar & Christos Koulamas, 2015. "On equivalence between the proportionate flow shop and single‐machine scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 595-603, October.
    13. Baker, Kenneth R., 2014. "Minimizing earliness and tardiness costs in stochastic scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 445-452.
    14. Biskup, Dirk & Simons, Dirk, 2004. "Common due date scheduling with autonomous and induced learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 606-616, December.
    15. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    16. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    17. Huynh Tuong, Nguyen & Soukhal, Ameur & Billaut, Jean-Charles, 2010. "A new dynamic programming formulation for scheduling independent tasks with common due date on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 646-653, May.
    18. Lemos, R.F. & Ronconi, D.P., 2015. "Heuristics for the stochastic single-machine problem with E/T costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 131-142.
    19. Shi Chen & Hau Lee, 2017. "Incentive Alignment and Coordination of Project Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1025, April.
    20. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:211:y:2013:i:1:p:167-177:10.1007/s10479-013-1458-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.