IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/voprob/2018i3p247-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Оценка Влияния Эффективного Контракта На Публикационную Активность Преподавателей: Кейс Регионального Университета

Author

Listed:
  • Антосик Л. В.
  • Шевченко Е. С.

Abstract

Антосик Любовь Валерьевна - кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры экономической теории, мировой и региональной экономики Волгоградского государственного университета. E-mail: AntosikLV@volsu.ruШевченко Екатерина Сергеевна - старший преподаватель кафедры экономической теории, мировой и региональной экономики Волгоградского государственного университета. E-mail: ShevchenkoES@volsu.ruВведение эффективного контракта в бюджетном секторе экономики Российской Федерации было обусловлено необходимостью обеспечить соответствие заработной платы и качества оказываемых услуг. Обзор существующих исследований академических контрактов и практик стимулирования публикационной активности в российских и зарубежных университетах показал, что ключевыми факторами научной активности преподавателей являются их внутренняя мотивация, наличие благоприятной академической среды, характер отношений в коллективе. В работе проведен анализ двух систем стимулирования публикационной активности в вузе: в рамках расчета рейтинга научной активности и системы эффективного контракта. Для анализа введения эффективного контракта в образовательных организациях исследователями используются преимущественно контент-анализ нормативно-правовых актов и социологические опросы. Авторы на основе данных по публикационной активности преподавателей института за шесть лет (три года до введения эффективного контракта и три года после) провели эконометрическое исследование влияния эффективного контракта на количество и качество публикаций. Для тестирования авторской гипотезы использовались модели с детерминированными индивидуальными эффектами, со случайными эффектами, а также метод наименьших квадратов и МНК с применением дамми-переменных. Предложена методика оценки влияния эффективного контракта на публикационную активность преподавателей. Сделан вывод, что на количество публикаций значимое положительное влияние оказали материальные факторы, а также участие в конференциях и повышение квалификации преподавателей. На качество публикаций значимо повлияли стимулирующая выплата и повышение квалификации. Введение эффективного контракта оказало воздействие только на общее количество публикаций.

Suggested Citation

  • Антосик Л. В. & Шевченко Е. С., 2018. "Оценка Влияния Эффективного Контракта На Публикационную Активность Преподавателей: Кейс Регионального Университета," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 247-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:voprob:2018:i:3:p:247-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2018/09/19/1154445537/10%20Antosik.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yana Roshchina & Maria Yudkevich, 2009. "Factors effecting university teachers' research: Management policies, contract incompleteness or environment infl uences?," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 203-228.
    2. Grossman, Sanford J & Hart, Oliver D, 1986. "The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pages 691-719, August.
    3. Hart, Oliver D & Moore, John, 1988. "Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 755-785, July.
    4. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 24-52, Special I.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albert H. Choi, 2015. "Non-Profit Status and Relational Sanctions: Commitment to Quality through Repeat Interactions and Organizational Choice," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4).
    2. James M. Malcomson, 2012. "Relational Incentive Contracts [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    3. Josh Lerner & Ulrike Malmendier, 2010. "Contractibility and the Design of Research Agreements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 214-246, March.
    4. repec:eee:labchp:v:3:y:1999:i:pb:p:2291-2372 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Francine Lafontaine & Margaret E. Slade, 1998. "Incentive Contracting and the Franchise Decision," NBER Working Papers 6544, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Müller, Daniel & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2016. "Vertragstheorie: Zum Nobelpreis 2016 für Oliver Hart und Bengt Holmström [Contract Theory: On the Contributions of the 2016 Nobel Laureates Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström]," MPRA Paper 75233, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ilya Segal & Michael D.Whinston, 2012. "Property Rights [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    8. Pablo Casas-Arce & Thomas Kittsteiner & F. Asís Martínez-Jerez, 2019. "Contracting with Opportunistic Partners: Theory and Application to Technology Development and Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 842-858, February.
    9. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    10. Surajeet Chakravarty & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2006. "Construction Contracts (or “How to Get the Right Building at the Right Price?”)," CESifo Working Paper Series 1714, CESifo.
    11. Giacomo Calzolari & Leonardo Felli & Johannes Koenen & Giancarlo Spagnolo & Konrad O. Stahl, 2021. "Relational Contracts and Trust in a High-Tech Industry," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_316, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    12. Gamal Atallah, 2002. "Production Technology, Information Technology, and Vertical Integration Under Asymmetric Information," Working Papers 0203EClassification-JEL: , University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    13. Christopher Hansman & Jonas Hjort & Gianmarco León-Ciliotta & Matthieu Teachout, 2020. "Vertical Integration, Supplier Behavior, and Quality Upgrading among Exporters," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(9), pages 3570-3625.
    14. Bester, Helmut, 2013. "Investments and the holdup problem in a matching market," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 302-311.
    15. Anna Matas & Ginés de Rus & Stef Proost & Salvador Bertoméu-Sánchez & Antonio Estache, 2018. "The Financing of Infrastructure / La financiación de las infraestructuras / El finançament de les infraestructures," IEB Reports ieb_report_1_2018, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    16. Patrick W. Schmitz, 2005. "Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(2), pages 318-336, Summer.
    17. Laura Alfaro & Nicholas Bloom & Paola Conconi & Harald Fadinger & Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2017. "Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-051, Harvard Business School, revised May 2019.
    18. Hideshi Itoh, 2006. "The Theories of International Outsourcing and Integration : A Theoretical Overview from the Perspective of Organizational Economics," Microeconomics Working Papers 21891, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    19. Göller, Daniel & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2014. "Breach remedies inducing hybrid investments," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 26-38.
    20. Giovanna Devetag & Enrico Zaninotto, 2001. "The imperfect hiding: Some introductory concepts and preliminary issues on modularity," ROCK Working Papers 010, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    21. Leonardo Felli & Kevin Roberts, 2016. "Does Competition Solve the Hold-up Problem?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(329), pages 172-200, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:voprob:2018:i:3:p:247-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.