IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2019i2p62-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Управление развитием Арктики: финансовое обеспечение региона и выбор критериев оценки эффективности инвестиционных проектов для его освоения // Managing of the Arctic Development: Financial Support of the Region and the Criteria Choice for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investment Projects

Author

Listed:
  • V. Tsvetkov A.

    (Market Economy Institute (MEI RAS))

  • M. Dudin N.

    (Market Economy Institute (MEI RAS))

  • D. Еrmilina A.

    (Market Economy Institute (MEI RAS))

  • В. Цветков А.

    (Институт проблем рынка РАН (ИПР РАН))

  • М. Дудин Н.

    (Институт проблем рынка РАН (ИПР РАН))

  • Д. Ермилина А.

    (Институт проблем рынка РАН (ИПР РАН))

Abstract

The article highlights the current problems of financial support for investment projects for the development of the Arctic. There is one of the most important factors in the implementation of such projects significant for the national economy should be a focus on the systematic development of the Arctic territories and the optimal development of its scientific and industrial potential. The full-scale implementation of such projects will provide a cargo flow increase across the Northern Sea route, that will affect positively on strategic positions of the russian economy, have being possessed one more perspective transit transport corridor. A research purpose is comprehensive study of the existing and perspective investment projects of the Arctic region development, to working-out on recommendations about the priority projects selection and assessment of their efficiency. The analysis of various federal programs and initiatives of the executive power of the Arctic shows the efficiency evaluation of investment projects of the region development and their selection should be based on indicators as commercial and budgetary, as well as the socio-economic efficiency of each project. Evaluation of each type of efficiency involves the use of a number of indicators from which the authors single out the most significant. Besides, the selection of the development investment projects of the Arctic region should consider the following criteria: coordination of project parameters, their consistency with the priorities of the Arctic state policy; specification of deadlines, amounts of funding, resources support and the presence of targeting in each project; definition of the target results of the project providing for the special (basic) zones formation in the Arctic development. Such approach provides a comprehensive assessment of each project from the point of feasibility view of implementing and obtaining the required results, which is going to be expressed in the sustainable scientific, industrial, economic and technological development of the russian Arctic. It is revealed that the assessment of the effectiveness of projects for the development of the Arctic region should be based on a set of indicators of commercial, socio-economic and budgetary efficiency. regulatory base assessment: methodological documents approved by the federal executive authorities, taking into account the peculiarities of the implementation of infrastructure projects based on various forms of public-private partnership. The stated above application assessment criteria for each individual Arctic project will allow optimal allocation of budget funding in the context of a shortage of public finances. В статье освещаются современные проблемы финансового обеспечения инвестиционных проектов освое-ния Арктики. Одним из важнейших факторов при реализации таких значимых для национальной экономики проектов должна быть ориентация на системное развитие арктических территорий и оптимальное освоение его научно-промышленного потенциала. Полномасштабная реализация таких проектов обеспечит увеличение грузопотока по Северному морскому пути, что, в свою очередь, позитивно отразится на стратегических пози-циях российской экономики, которая будет обладать еще одним перспективным транзитным транспортным коридором. Цель исследования — всестороннее изучение действующих и перспективных инвестиционных про-ектов освоения Арктического региона, разработка рекомендаций по отбору приоритетных проектов и оценка их эффективности. Анализ различных федеральных программ и инициатив исполнительной власти в области развития Арктики показывает, что оценка эффективности инвестиционных проектов освоения региона и их отбор должны базироваться на показателях не только коммерческой и бюджетной, но и социально-экономи-ческой эффективности каждого проекта. Оценка каждого вида эффективности предполагает использование ряда показателей, среди которых авторами выделяются наиболее значимые. Кроме того, отбор инвестици-онных проектов развития Арктического региона должен учитывать следующие критерии: согласование па-раметров проектов, их непротиворечивость приоритетам государственной политике в Арктике; конкретиза-ция сроков исполнения, объемов финансирования, ресурсного обеспечения и наличие адресности в каждом проекте; определение целевых результатов проекта, предусматривающих формирование специальных (опор-ных) зон развития Арктики. Такой подход обеспечивает комплексную оценку каждого проекта с точки зрения целесообразности реализации и получения требуемых результатов, которые будут выражаться в устойчивом научно-промышленном и экономико-технологическом развитии российской Арктики. Выявлено, что оценка эффективности проектов освоения Арктического региона должна быть основана на совокупности показате-лей коммерческой, социально-экономической и бюджетной эффективности. Нормативная база оценки: мето-дические документы, утвержденные органами федеральной исполнительной власти, с учетом особенностей реализации инфраструктурных проектов на основе различных форм государственно-частного партнерства. Применение указанных выше критериев оценки для каждого отдельно взятого арктического проекта позволит оптимально распределять бюджетное финансирование в условиях дефицита государственных финансов.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Tsvetkov A. & M. Dudin N. & D. Еrmilina A. & В. Цветков А. & М. Дудин Н. & Д. Ермилина А., 2019. "Управление развитием Арктики: финансовое обеспечение региона и выбор критериев оценки эффективности инвестиционных проектов для его освоения // Managing of the Arctic Development: Financial Support of," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 9(2), pages 62-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2019:i:2:p:62-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/208/193.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winzer, Christian, 2012. "Conceptualizing energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 36-48.
    2. Aleksandr Tatarkin & Irina Polyanskaya & Margaret Ignatieva & Vera Yurak, 2014. "Consistent assessment of the status and prospects of institutional and innovational subsurface resources management in the arctic zone," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 146-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Vechkinzova & Yelena Petrenko & Yana S. Matkovskaya & Gaukhar Koshebayeva, 2021. "The Dilemma of Long-Term Development of the Electric Power Industry in Kazakhstan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Gupta, Kuhika & Nowlin, Matthew C. & Ripberger, Joseph T. & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Silva, Carol L., 2019. "Tracking the nuclear ‘mood’ in the United States: Introducing a long term measure of public opinion about nuclear energy using aggregate survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Andrew Chapman & Timothy Fraser & Melanie Dennis, 2019. "Investigating Ties between Energy Policy and Social Equity Research: A Citation Network Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Nyga-Łukaszewska Honorata & Napiórkowski Tomasz M., 2023. "Energy security as a source of international competitiveness in new EU member states," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(3), pages 209-224, September.
    5. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Maria Gheorghe, 2022. "The Impact of the Energy Crisis in Europe," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 84-89, Decembrie.
    7. Erahman, Qodri Febrilian & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu & Sudibandriyo, Mahmud & Hidayatno, Akhmad, 2016. "An assessment of Indonesia's energy security index and comparison with seventy countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 364-376.
    8. Mazur, Christoph & Hoegerle, Yannick & Brucoli, Maria & van Dam, Koen & Guo, Miao & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "A holistic resilience framework development for rural power systems in emerging economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 219-232.
    9. Huang, Beijia & Zhang, Long & Ma, Linmao & Bai, Wuliyasu & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Dmitriy Barkhatov & Petr Marek & Jan Martin Rolenc & Jarolím Antal, 2019. "Nuclear power expansion and its economic implications to the energy security of the Czech Republic," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(1), pages 29-51.
    11. Toka, Agorasti & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum & Grigoriadou, Anastasia-Loukia, 2014. "Managing the diffusion of biomass in the residential energy sector: An illustrative real-world case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 56-69.
    12. Siqi Li & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Energy Sustainability Evaluation Model Based on the Matter-Element Extension Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    13. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Honorata Nyga-Łukaszewska & Kentaka Aruga & Katarzyna Stala-Szlugaj, 2020. "Energy Security of Poland and Coal Supply: Price Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Evgeny Lisin & Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Chernova & Alena Fomina, 2018. "Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Gelengul KOCASLAN, 2014. "International Energy Security Indicators and Turkey s Energy Security Risk Score," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(4), pages 735-743.
    17. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Oksana Logvinenko, 2020. "A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Egidijus Šarauskis, 2021. "Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Karen Pittel, 2012. "Das energiepolitische Zieldreieck und die Energiewende," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(12), pages 22-26, June.
    20. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens, 2023. "The Impact of Removing Coal from Poland’s Energy Mix on Selected Aspects of the Country’s Energy Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2019:i:2:p:62-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.