IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2018i6p95-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Интеграционные процессы в АТР с участием Китая и позиция России // Integration Processes in the asia-Pacific Region with the Participation of China and the Position of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • A. Kuznetsov V.

    (Financial University.)

  • А. Кузнецов В.

    (Финансовый университет.)

Abstract

Flourishing of the East Asian Tigers has led to unparalleled growth in trade in the Asia-Pacific region (APR). The crises of the multilateral trading system and the need to move to a polycentric model of the world order have become the pivotal motives to enhance cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region. Expected to be signed by the end of 2018, a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement can be the institutional framework for integration processes in the Asia Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific region is one of the most prospective regions in the world in terms of consuming natural gas and oil. Successful integration processes in Asia depend significantly on the foreign policy priorities of Russia, the key geopolitical player and energy producer. The objective of the article is to reveal the nature of China’s participation in building a new global economy model on the example of the RCEP as well as the position of Russia regarding the integration processes in the Asia-Pacific region. The methods of scientific abstraction, comparative analysis and logical generalization have been used. The main theoretical approaches have been systematized and summarized the analysis of the role of China in the integration processes in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of the polycyclic transformations of the global economy dominant paradigm. China regards the uSA as its main competitor and the usurper of global resources. In recent decades, China has demonstrated undeniable economic achievements based on the success of the industrial policy. China is leading the creation of the world largest trade bloc to be able to determine independently the future agenda of the global economy. However, with no political support, intellectual and raw materials resources of Russia, it will be difficult for China to achieve parity with the West in the world economic arena. It has been concluded that in order to take advantage of the integration processes in the APR, Russia should take an active position in a constructive dialogue with China and other Asia-Pacific countries on numerous unresolved issues of bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Asian investors and consumers should be admitted to Russian oil and gas resources simultaneously with the introduction of Russia in the regional value chain in the Asia-Pacific region on mutually beneficial terms. Стремительное развитие «восточноазиатских тигров» привело к беспрецедентному росту торговли в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе (АТР). Основные мотивы углубления сотрудничества в АТР — кризис многосторонней торговой системы и необходимость перехода к полицентричной модели мирового устройства. Институциональной базой интеграционных процессов в АТР может стать соглашение о Всеобъемлющем региональном экономическом партнерстве (ВРЭП), заключение которого ожидается к концу 2018 г. АТР выступает одним из самых перспективных регионов потребления природного газа и нефти в мире. Успех интеграционных процессов в Азии в значительной степени зависит от расстановки внешнеполитических приоритетов России как ключевого геополитического игрока и производителя энергоресурсов. Цель статьи — выявление особенностей участия Китая в формировании новой модели глобальной экономики на примере создания ВРЭП и определение позиции России в отношении интеграционных процессов в АТР. Использованы методы научной абстракции, сравнительного анализа и логического обобщения. Систематизированы и обобщены основные теоретические подходы к анализу роли Китая в интеграционных процессах в АТР в контексте полициклических трансформаций господствующей парадигмы глобальной экономики. Китай рассматривает США как своего главного конкурента и узурпатора глобальных ресурсов. В последние десятилетия Китай продемонстрировал неоспоримые экономические достижения, основанные на успехах проведения промышленной политики. Он возглавляет создание крупнейшего торгового блока в мире, чтобы самостоятельно определять повестку дня глобальной экономики в будущем. Однако без политической поддержки, интеллектуальных и сырьевых ресурсов России Китаю будет сложно достичь паритетного положения с Западом на мировой экономической арене. Сделан вывод о том, что России для использования преимуществ интеграционных процессов в АТР следует занимать активную позицию в организации конструктивного диалога с Китаем и другими странами АТР по многочисленным неразрешенным вопросам двустороннего и многостороннего сотрудничества. Допуск азиатских инвесторов и потребителей к российским нефтегазовым ресурсам необходимо осуществлять одновременно с включением России в региональную цепочку создания стоимости в АТР на взаимовыгодных условиях.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Kuznetsov V. & А. Кузнецов В., 2018. "Интеграционные процессы в АТР с участием Китая и позиция России // Integration Processes in the asia-Pacific Region with the Participation of China and the Position of Russia," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(6), pages 95-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:6:p:95-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/782/528.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer & Shujiro Urata & Fan Zhai, 2017. "Going It Alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Trade Agreements Without the United States," Working Paper Series WP17-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. Lee, Hiro & Itakura, Ken, 2018. "The welfare and sectoral adjustment effects of mega-regional trade agreements on ASEAN countries," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 20-32.
    3. Li, Qiaomin & Scollay, Robert & Gilbert, John, 2017. "Analyzing the effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 409-420.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Sheng & Xu, Zhiwei, 2022. "Energy efficiency assessment of RCEP member states: A three-stage slack based measurement DEA with undesirable outputs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Ken Itakura & Hiro Lee, 2023. "Should the United States rejoin the Trans-Pacific trade deal?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 235-255, May.
    3. Takatoshi Ito & Kazumasa Iwata & Colin McKenzie & Shujiro Urata, 2018. "Did Abenomics Succeed?: Editors' Overview," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Akune, Yuko, 2019. "Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Japanese Agri-food Sectors: A General Equilibrium Analysis with Farm Heterogeneity and Product Differentiation," Conference papers 333025, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Huang, Qingbo & Zhang, Xiaohan & Li, Yan, 2023. "Study on the economic effects of China and ASEAN countries from the New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 123-135.
    6. Boris A. Kheyfets, 2018. "Globalization does not End, it Becomes Another," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 11(1).
    7. Jun Zhai & Zhuo Ning, 2022. "Models for the Economic Impacts of Forest Disturbances: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Kamal Halili Hassan & Muhammad Faliq Abd Razak & Rohaida Nordin & Rohani Abdul Rahim, 2018. "Malaysia with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Aftermath of the United States Withdrawal From the TPPA," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(10), pages 868-880, October.
    9. Zhang, Wenwen & Cao, Shuo & Zhang, Xuan & Qu, Xuefeng, 2023. "COVID-19 and stock market performance: Evidence from the RCEP countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 717-735.
    10. Zhou, Lingling & Pan, Chen & He, Jianwu & Li, Shantong, 2021. "The Impact of RCEP on Chinese Regional Economy from Global Value Chains Perspective," Conference papers 333306, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Michael Frenkel & Tuyet Ngo, 2021. "Das RCEP-Abkommen und dessen Bedeutung für die EU [The RCEP and Its Relevance to the EU]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(6), pages 432-438, June.
    12. Banga, Rashmi, 2019. "CPTPP: Implications for Malaysia’s Merchandise Trade Balance," MPRA Paper 93254, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Koffi Dumor & Komlan Gbongli, 2021. "Trade impacts of the New Silk Road in Africa: Insight from Neural Networks Analysis," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 17(02), pages 13-26.
    14. Thompson, Edmund R. & Dericks, Gerard H. & Fai, Felicia, 2019. "Development and validation of a firm-level vertical and horizontal internationalization metric," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 533-543.
    15. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Akune, Yuko, 2020. "Can the Japanese agri-food producers survive under freer trade? A general equilibrium analysis with farm heterogeneity and product differentiation," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    16. Itakura, Ken & Lee, Hiro, 2019. "Estimating the Effects of the CPTPP and RCEP in a General Equilibrium Framework with Global Value Chains," Conference papers 333031, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Nobuhiro Hosoe & Yuko Akune, 2019. "Can the Japanese Agri-food Sectors Survive by Promoting their Exports?:A General Equilibrium Analysis with Farm Heterogeneity and Product Differentiation," GRIPS Discussion Papers 19-06, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    18. Gabriel Mhonyera & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2023. "The Impact of AfCFTA on Welfare and Trade: Nigeria and South Africa in Light of Core Export Competences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Shepherd, Ben, 2019. "Mega-regional trade agreements and Asia: An application of structural gravity to goods, services, and value chains," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 32-42.
    20. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2020. "Should China Join the New Trans‐Pacific Partnership?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 18-36, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:6:p:95-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.