IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v101y2021i6d10.1007_s10273-021-2938-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Das RCEP-Abkommen und dessen Bedeutung für die EU
[The RCEP and Its Relevance to the EU]

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Frenkel

    (WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management)

  • Tuyet Ngo

    (WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Im November 2020 wurde das RCEP-Abkommen als größtes Freihandelsabkommen der Welt von Brunei, Kambodscha, Indonesien, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, den Philippinen, Singapur, Thailand, Vietnam sowie Australien, China, Japan, Neuseeland und Südkorea unterzeichnet. Bis Ende 2022 soll das Abkommen ratifiziert sein und in Kraft treten. Zusammen entfallen auf die Mitgliedsländer 25 % des internationalen Waren- und Dienstleistungsverkehrs. Es stellt sich die Frage, welche positiven und negativen Auswirkungen das Freihandelsabkommen für die Mitgliedsländer sowie die EU haben wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Frenkel & Tuyet Ngo, 2021. "Das RCEP-Abkommen und dessen Bedeutung für die EU [The RCEP and Its Relevance to the EU]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(6), pages 432-438, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2938-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-021-2938-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-021-2938-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-021-2938-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahar Amidi & Ali Fagheh Majidi, 2020. "Geographic proximity, trade and economic growth: a spatial econometrics approach," Post-Print hal-03529593, HAL.
    2. Li, Qiaomin, 2017. "Analyzing Effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a Firm Heterogeneity CGE Framework," Conference papers 330179, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2020. "East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia's New Trade Blocs," Working Paper Series WP20-09, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. Li, Qiaomin & Scollay, Robert & Gilbert, John, 2017. "Analyzing the effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 409-420.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinxiong Wu & Chen Chen Yong & Su Teng Lee, 2022. "Addressing the COVID-19 Shock: The Potential Job Creation in China by the RCEP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Zhai & Zhuo Ning, 2022. "Models for the Economic Impacts of Forest Disturbances: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Zhang, Wenwen & Cao, Shuo & Zhang, Xuan & Qu, Xuefeng, 2023. "COVID-19 and stock market performance: Evidence from the RCEP countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 717-735.
    3. Zhou, Lingling & Pan, Chen & He, Jianwu & Li, Shantong, 2021. "The Impact of RCEP on Chinese Regional Economy from Global Value Chains Perspective," Conference papers 333306, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Thompson, Edmund R. & Dericks, Gerard H. & Fai, Felicia, 2019. "Development and validation of a firm-level vertical and horizontal internationalization metric," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 533-543.
    5. Zhou, Sheng & Xu, Zhiwei, 2022. "Energy efficiency assessment of RCEP member states: A three-stage slack based measurement DEA with undesirable outputs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    6. Minh Doan Nguyen & Nga Le Thi Viet & Huy Dinh Tran Ngoc & Dat Pham Minh, 2021. "Vietnam’s Meat Import Market Under Impacts Of The European -Vietnam Free Trade Agreement And Quality Management Demand," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 99-117, January.
    7. Durán Lima, José Elías & Aguiar, Angel & Ronzheimer, Ira Nadine, 2021. "Economic and social effects of a possible trade agreement between Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region," Comercio Internacional 47659, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Marc Atkins & Christian Peitz, 2023. "The world's largest free trade agreement RCEP and its financial markets - A perspective on volatility and risk," Working Papers Dissertations 113, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    9. Bakari, Sayef, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Domestic Investments and CO2 Emissions on Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Comprehensive Study (1990-2022)," MPRA Paper 120370, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Aldieri, Luigi & Bruno, Bruna & Makkonen, Teemu & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2023. "Environmental innovations, geographically mediated knowledge spillovers, economic and environmental performance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Lintunen, Julia, 2021. "An overview of China's regional trade agreements," BOFIT Policy Briefs 1/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    12. Essossinam Ali & Hodabalo Bataka & Kwami Ossadzifo Wonyra & Nadège Essossolim Awade & Nèmè Nalèwazou Braly, 2024. "Global value chains participation and environmental pollution in developing countries: Does digitalization matter?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 451-478, January.
    13. Ahmad, Mahyudin & Siong Hook, Law, 2022. "Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities," MPRA Paper 114471, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Fukunari Kimura & Shujiro Urata & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko, 2022. "The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities for ASEAN and East Asia," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shujiro Urata & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: The Framework for Regional Integration, chapter 1, pages 1-11, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    15. Rezgar FEIZI & Sahar AMIDI & Thais NUNEZ-ROCHA & Isabelle RABAUD, 2022. "Carbon Tax and Emissions Transfer: a Spatial Analysis," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2965, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    16. Liu, Zhongmei & Zhu, A-Xing & Zhang, Wenxin & Ren, Mei, 2021. "An improved potential-based approach to measuring the daily accessibility of HSR," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 271-284.
    17. Xinxiong Wu & Chen Chen Yong & Su Teng Lee, 2022. "Addressing the COVID-19 Shock: The Potential Job Creation in China by the RCEP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Shiro Armstrong, 2021. "Economic Diplomacy and Economic Security under Abe," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 283-299, July.
    19. Xiaoli Chen & Zhefeng Huang & Chaoguang Luo & Zhineng Hu, 2024. "Can Agricultural Industry Integration Reduce the Rural–Urban Income Gap? Evidence from County-Level Data in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Iván Kataryniuk & Javier Pérez & Francesca Viani, 2021. "(De-)Globalisation of trade and regionalisation: a survey of the facts and arguments," Occasional Papers 2124, Banco de España.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2938-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.