IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2018i2p58-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Цифровая экономика в России: состояние и перспективы развития // The Digital Economy in Russia: Its State and Prospects of Development

Author

Listed:
  • L. Kapranova D.

    (Financial University, Moscow)

  • Л. Капранова Д.

    (Финансовый университет, Москва)

Abstract

The subject of the research is digital technologies regarded as a priority in the economic development of Russia. The objectives of the research are a comprehensive study of the digital economy in Russia and abroad; the analysis of the Digital Economy program as a priority in the economic policy of the country; determining the prospects for the digitalization of the economy. Conclusions. Russia has all the prerequisites needed for further realization of the digital potential and acceleration of the economy digitalization. New technologies will have a significant impact on the development of business and public management, the growth of the life quality, the emergence of new forms of socialization of people and their communications. Russia has the necessary intellectual and scientific base; there are original organizational and technological solutions to create an effective infrastructure of the digital economy. For the implementation of the “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” program the volume of the R&D funding should be increased and the staff training in the field of high technologies improved. Предмет исследования — цифровые технологии, имеющие приоритетное значение в экономическом развитии России. Цели работы — комплексное исследование состояния цифровой экономики в России и мире, анализ программы «Цифровая экономика» в качестве приоритетного направления в экономическом развитии страны, определение перспектив развития цифровизации экономики. Выводы — у России есть все необходимые предпосылки для дальнейшей реализации цифрового потенциала и ускорения темпов цифровизации экономики. Новые технологии окажут существенное воздействие на развитие бизнеса и государственного управления, рост качества жизни, появление новых форм социализации людей и их коммуникации. Россия располагает необходимой интеллектуальной и научной базой; имеются оригинальные организационнотехнологические решения по созданию эффективной инфраструктуры цифровой экономики. При реализации программы «Цифровая экономика Российской Федерации» должны быть увеличены объемы финансирования научно-исследовательских разработок, улучшена подготовка кадров в сфере высоких технологий.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Kapranova D. & Л. Капранова Д., 2018. "Цифровая экономика в России: состояние и перспективы развития // The Digital Economy in Russia: Its State and Prospects of Development," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 11(2), pages 58-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:2:p:58-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/392/375.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grilli, Luca & Mazzucato, Mariana & Meoli, Michele & Scellato, Giuseppe, 2018. "Sowing the seeds of the future: Policies for financing tomorrow's innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-7.
    2. John Mark Boden & Cristiano Cagnin & Vicente Carabias Barcelo & Karel Haegeman & Timo-Topias Totti Könnölä, 2010. "Facing the Future: Time for the EU to meet Global Challenges," JRC Research Reports JRC56873, Joint Research Centre, revised May 2010.
    3. Cagnin, Cristiano & Havas, Attila & Saritas, Ozcan, 2013. "Future-oriented technology analysis: Its potential to address disruptive transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 379-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Sinkovic, Dean, 2023. "Regional aspects of financial development and renewable energy: A cross-sectional study in 214 countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1142-1157.
    2. Elizabeth Gibson & Tugrul Daim & Edwin Garces & Marina Dabic, 2018. "Technology Foresight: A Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Leading and Emerging Methods," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 6-24.
    3. Takey, Silvia Mayumi & Carvalho, Marly M., 2016. "Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-109.
    4. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Rafael Lizarralde & Jaione Ganzarain & Mikel Zubizarreta, 2020. "Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Gatt, Suzanne & Faurschou, Kim, 2016. "Implementing the European Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training (EQAVET) at National Level: Some Insights from the PEN Leonardo Project," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 3(1), pages 29-45.
    7. José-Miguel Fernández-Güell & Marta Collado-Lara & Silvia Guzmán-Araña & Victoria Fernández-Añez, 2016. "Incorporating a Systemic and Foresight Approach into Smart City Initiatives: The Case of Spanish Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 43-67, July.
    8. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Haddad, Carolina R. & Uriona Maldonado, Mauricio, 2017. "A functions approach to improve sectoral technology roadmaps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 251-260.
    10. Dirk Meissner & Alexander Sokolov, 2013. "Foresight and science, technology and innovation indicators," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 16, pages 381-402, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Sergey Novikov & Elmira Amirova & Elena Kosykh & Marina Chudinovskikh & Olga Nikolaevskaya, 2019. "Strategic Planning and Management of High-Tech Developments and Innovative Technical Solutions," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 309-314, December.
    12. Alexander Giglavy & Alexander Sokolov & Gulnara Abdrakhmanova & Alexander Chulok & Vasily Burov, 2013. "Long-Term Trends in the ICT Sector," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 6-24.
    13. Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Lopolito, Antonio & Sica, Edgardo, 2019. "Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Kokshagina, Olga & Gillier, Thomas & Cogez, Patrick & Le Masson, Pascal & Weil, Benoit, 2017. "Using innovation contests to promote the development of generic technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 152-164.
    15. Paliokaitė, Agnė & Martinaitis, Žilvinas & Sarpong, David, 2016. "Implementing smart specialisation roadmaps in Lithuania: Lost in translation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 143-152.
    16. Julian Marius Müller & Raphael Kunderer, 2019. "Ex-Ante Prediction of Disruptive Innovation: The Case of Battery Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Yuri Dekhtyaruk & Igor Karyshev & Maria Korableva & Natalia Velikanova & Anastasia Edelkina & Oleg Karasev & Marina Klubova & Anna Bogomolova & Natalia Dyshkant, 2014. "Foresight in Civil Shipbuilding - 2030," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 30-45.
      • Yuri Dekhtyaruk & Igor Karyshev & Maria Korableva & Natalia Velikanova & Anastasia Edelkina & Oleg Karasev & Marina Klubova & Anna Bogomolova & Natalia Dyshkant, 2014. "Foresight in civil shipbuilding — 2030," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(2 (eng)), pages 30-45.
    18. Noh, Heeyong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 956-970.
    19. Wiener, Melanie & Gattringer, Regina & Strehl, Franz, 2020. "Collaborative open foresight - A new approach for inspiring discontinuous and sustainability-oriented innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Piotr Sienkiewicz & Halina Świeboda, 2019. "Wartościowanie techniki w systemach zarządzania," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 27-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:2:p:58-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.