IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v27y2023i1p119-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship of Critical Success Factors of the Mineral Industry: A Study on India

Author

Listed:
  • Manoj Kumar Mohanty
  • Padma Charan Mishra
  • Alaka Samantaray

Abstract

The mineral industry environment is an interlinked chain of activities. Identification of major activities of the mineral industry, termed as critical success factors (CSFs), and their relationship structure will be approachable, productive and efficiency-oriented for the industry to manage. The aim of the article is to develop a relationship structure consisting of CSFs influencing the mineral industry. Sixteen such operational influencing CSFs are identified through a broad literature review and subsequent dialogues held with mineral-field experts. The interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach is applied for analysing CSFs and finding a relationship structure. The study is carried out in Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, mineral-rich states of India. Identification of CSFs and their relationship is carried out in nine phases sequentially to arrive at the latent structure. This is the only study to develop relationships of CSFs for any mineral industry in India. The findings of the study will provide insights on the relationship structure of CSFs of the mineral industry’s operation and be helpful for improvements in addressing operational difficulties for corporates, as well as academics. Among the 16 CSFs identified, ‘training and skill level’, ‘infrastructure’ and ‘political influence’ have the maximum driving force and are the least dependent. The projected model is helpful in understanding the relationship among CSFs and the business operation as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Manoj Kumar Mohanty & Padma Charan Mishra & Alaka Samantaray, 2023. "The Relationship of Critical Success Factors of the Mineral Industry: A Study on India," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 119-134, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:119-134
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629211013916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629211013916
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629211013916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Haas, Ralph & Poelhekke, Steven, 2019. "Mining matters: Natural resource extraction and firm-level constraints," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 109-124.
    2. Shingo Takahashi, 2011. "How Multi-Tasking Job Designs Affect Productivity: Evidence from the Australian Coal Mining Industry," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(5), pages 841-862, October.
    3. Andrew Sharpe & Celeste Bradley, 2009. "A Detailed Analysis of the Productivity Performance of Mining in Canada," CSLS Research Reports 2009-07, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    4. Vernon Topp & Leo Soames & Dean Parham & Harry Bloch, 2008. "Productivity in the Mining Industry: Measurement and Interpretation," Staff Working Papers 0807, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    5. Groeneveld, Benjamin & Topal, Erkan & Leenders, Bob, 2019. "Examining system configuration in an open pit mine design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Padma Charan Mishra & Manoj Kumar Mohanty & Manmohan Mall, 2018. "Operational attributes influencing productivity in Indian opencast mines," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(2), pages 177-195.
    7. Sun, Sizhong & Anwar, Sajid, 2019. "R&D activities and FDI in China’s iron ore mining industry," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 47-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tilton, John E., 2013. "The terms of trade debate and the policy implications for primary product producers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 196-203.
    2. Villena, Marcelo & Greve, Fernando, 2018. "On resource depletion and productivity: The case of the Chilean copper industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 553-562.
    3. Sam Mitra, 2019. "Depletion, technology, and productivity growth in the metallic minerals industry," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 19-37, April.
    4. John E. Tilton, 2013. "Cyclical and Secular Determinants of Productivity in the Copper, Aluminum, Iron Ore, and Coal Industries," Working Papers 2013-11, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    5. Andrew Sharpe & Blair Long, 2012. "Innovation in Canadian Natural Resource Industries: A Systems-Based Analysis of Performance, Policy and Emerging Challenges," CSLS Research Reports 2012-06, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    6. Hansen, James & Gross, Isaac, 2018. "Commodity price volatility with endogenous natural resources," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 157-180.
    7. Calzada Olvera, Beatriz & Iizuka, Michiko, 2020. "How does innovation take place in the mining industry? : Understanding the logic behind innovation in a changing context," MERIT Working Papers 2020-019, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Karan Bhuwalka & Randolph E. Kirchain & Elsa A. Olivetti & Richard Roth, 2023. "Quantifying the drivers of long‐term prices in materials supply chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 141-154, February.
    9. David Humphreys, 2020. "Mining productivity and the fourth industrial revolution," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 115-125, July.
    10. Gregory, Robert G., 2012. "Living standards, terms of trade and foreign ownership: reflections on the Australian mining boom," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(2), pages 1-30.
    11. Ewees, Ahmed A. & Elaziz, Mohamed Abd & Alameer, Zakaria & Ye, Haiwang & Jianhua, Zhang, 2020. "Improving multilayer perceptron neural network using chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm to forecast iron ore price volatility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2014. "Bigger cakes with less ingredients? A comparison of material use of the world economy," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-030, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Éléonore Lèbre & Glen Corder, 2015. "Integrating Industrial Ecology Thinking into the Management of Mining Waste," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Hamit Aydin, 2020. "Fifty years of copper mining: the US labor productivity," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 11-19, July.
    15. Asatryan, Zareh & Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Birkholz, Carlo & Gomtsyan, David, 2021. "Favoritism and firms: Micro evidence and macro implications," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-031, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Neil Dias Karunaratne, 2015. "The Productivity Paradox and the Australian Mining Boom and Bust," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Lin Zhou & Jianglong Li & Yangqing Dan & Chunping Xie & Houyin Long & Hongxun Liu, 2019. "Entering and Exiting: Productivity Evolution of Energy Supply in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Kushnir, Duncan & Sandén, Björn A., 2012. "The time dimension and lithium resource constraints for electric vehicles," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 93-103.
    19. Pelzl, Paul & Poelhekke, Steven, 2021. "Good mine, bad mine: Natural resource heterogeneity and Dutch disease in Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Ahmad Hosseinzadeh & Russell Smyth & Abbas Valadkhani & Amir Moradi, 2018. "What determines the efficiency of Australian mining companies?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(1), pages 121-138, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:119-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.