IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i11p2293-2311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rivalry between social and private landlords in local rental housing markets

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Lennartz

Abstract

Social housing providers in many advanced economies have been directed towards market-orientated and commercial business models, whereas the scope of the private rental sector has been increasingly expanded to the provision of housing for low-income households. Where these developments coincided, the demarcation between the activities of social and private landlords has blurred, with the result of increasing competitive pressure on both groups. This paper sheds light on the behavioural aspects of competition by introducing the concept of inter-landlord rivalry in local rental housing markets. Drawing on data from 36 in-depth interviews with social and private landlords in Coventry/England and Breda/the Netherlands, this study shows that existing perceptions of rivalry among most landlords are exceptional in low-income renting but pronounced in more expensive, commercial rental segments. The paper will demonstrate that these perceptions are highly subjective and non-reciprocal. Moreover, competitive perceptions and interactions are strongly affected by political and market structural settings, and appear to be dependent on the trade-off between the social mission and commercial goals of individual housing associations in the social housing sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Lennartz, 2016. "Rivalry between social and private landlords in local rental housing markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2293-2311, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2293-2311
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015592818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015592818
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015592818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Teasdale, 2012. "Negotiating Tensions: How Do Social Enterprises in the Homelessness Field Balance Social and Commercial Considerations?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 514-532.
    2. Martin, Stephen, 2010. "Industrial Organization in Context," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199291199.
    3. Nair, Anil & Selover, David D., 2012. "A study of competitive dynamics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 355-361.
    4. Darinka Czischke & Vincent Gruis & David Mullins, 2012. "Conceptualising Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 418-437.
    5. Christian Lennartz, 2014. "Market structures of rental housing: conceptualising perfect competition in mixed local rental markets," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 56-78, January.
    6. Mary Rhodes & David Mullins, 2009. "Market Concepts, Coordination Mechanisms and New Actors in Social Housing," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 107-119.
    7. Christian Lennartz, 2014. "Market structures of rental housing: conceptualising perfect competition in mixed local rental markets," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 56-78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandros M. Goulielmos, 2018. "“After End-2008 Structural Changes in Containership Market” and Their Impact on Industry’s Policy," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Zhiyong Liu & Yue Qiao, 2012. "Abuse of Market Dominance Under China’s 2007 Anti-monopoly Law: A Preliminary Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(1), pages 77-107, August.
    3. Reshma Shrestha & Jaap Zevenbergen & Fahria Masum & Mahesh Banskota, 2018. "“Action Space” Based Urban Land Governance Pattern: Implication in Managing Informal Settlements from the Perspective of Low-Income Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Tomohisa Okada & Takanori Adachi, 2013. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination, Consumption Externalities, and Market Opening," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 209-219, June.
    5. Roman Inderst & Frank Maier-Rigaud & Ulrich Schwalbe, 2013. "Quantifizierung von Schäden durch Wettbewerbsverstöße," Working Papers 2013-ECO-08, IESEG School of Management.
    6. Gorecki, Paul, 2017. "Sentencing in Ireland's First Bid-Rigging Cartel Case: An Appraisal," MPRA Paper 80787, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Donghyun Kim & Up Lim, 2017. "Social Enterprise as a Catalyst for Sustainable Local and Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Nicola Morrison, 2017. "Selling the family silver? Institutional entrepreneurship and asset disposal in the English housing association sector," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2856-2873, September.
    9. Roy, Michael J. & Donaldson, Cam & Baker, Rachel & Kerr, Susan, 2014. "The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 182-193.
    10. Krishnendu Ghosh DASTIDAR & YANO Makoto, 2017. "In many emerging economies corruption, poor quality of information and poor governance lead to restricted entry. In this paper we analyze the determinants of the .height.of entry barrier in a developi," Discussion papers 17010, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Theeke, Matt, 2016. "The effects of internal and external competition on innovation breadth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3324-3331.
    12. Janni Grouleff Nielsen & Rainer Lueg & Dennis van Liempd, 2019. "Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Bob Doherty & Pichawadee Kittipanya-Ngam, 2021. "The Role of Social Enterprise Hybrid Business Models in Inclusive Value Chain Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Liam Clegg, 2019. "Economic geography and the regulatory state: Asymmetric marketization of social housing in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1479-1498, October.
    15. Leonardo C. B. Cardoso & Carlos Frederico A. Uchôa & Williams Huamani & David R. Just & Raúl V. Gomez, 2022. "Price effects of spatial competition in retail fuel markets: the impact of a new rival nearby," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(1), pages 81-105, February.
    16. Gorecki, Paul, 2018. "Cartel Sentencing in Ireland: Criminal Standards of Proof, But Civil Sanctions," MPRA Paper 89817, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Heese, Jonas & Krishnan, Ranjani & Ramasubramanian, Hari, 2021. "The Department of Justice as a gatekeeper in whistleblower-initiated corporate fraud enforcement: Drivers and consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    18. Yu-Ching Chiao, 2014. "Country risk, multimarket contacts and MNEs' competitive action," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 329-350.
    19. Randolph, Bill & Troy, Laurence & Milligan, Vivienne & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Paying for affordable housing in different market contexts," SocArXiv 38xu2, Center for Open Science.
    20. Iain A. Davies & Bob Doherty, 2019. "Balancing a Hybrid Business Model: The Search for Equilibrium at Cafédirect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1043-1066, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:11:p:2293-2311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.