IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i4p775-792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart growth in two contrastive metropolitan areas: A comparison between Portland and Los Angeles

Author

Listed:
  • Hongwei Dong

    (California State University, Fresno, USA)

  • Pengyu Zhu

    (Boise State University, USA)

Abstract

This study compares urban landscapes in the Portland and Los Angeles metropolitan areas at the neighbourhood level by operationalising six smart growth indices and mapping their spatial distribution patterns and time trends. Analysis results show that the two metropolitan areas have both strengths and weaknesses in different aspects of smart growth. Most neighbourhoods in both regions do not excel in all six smart growth measures: they are at the high ends of some smart growth indices but at the low ends of others. Some smart growth features such as mixed land use and mixed housing are already pervasive in suburban areas. Density in some mature suburban neighbourhoods is also relatively high. A large number of neighbourhoods in suburban and exurban areas exhibit high levels of socioeconomic diversity. Time trend analyses suggest that in both regions, older neighbourhoods tend to be ‘smarter’ than newer ones, except for racial/ethnic diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongwei Dong & Pengyu Zhu, 2015. "Smart growth in two contrastive metropolitan areas: A comparison between Portland and Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(4), pages 775-792, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:4:p:775-792
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098014528396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098014528396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098014528396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Pendall & John I. Carruthers, 2003. "Does density exacerbate income segregation? Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 541-589, January.
    2. Stephen Wheeler & Craig Beebe, 2011. "The Rise of the Postmodern Metropolis: Spatial Evolution of the Sacramento Metropolitan Region," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(03), pages 307-332.
    3. Michael Ekers & Pierre Hamel & Roger Keil, 2012. "Governing Suburbia: Modalities and Mechanisms of Suburban Governance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 405-422, December.
    4. Jerry Anthony, 2006. "State Growth Management and Housing Prices," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 87(1), pages 122-141, March.
    5. Emily Talen, 2013. "Zoning For and Against Sprawl: The Case for Form-Based Codes," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 175-200, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Charmes & Roger Keil, 2015. "The Politics of Post-Suburban Densification in Canada and France," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 581-602, May.
    2. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    3. Monkkonen, Paavo & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2014. "Innovative measurement of spatial segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 99-111.
    4. Crane, Randall, 2008. "Counterpoint: Accessibility and Sprawl," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 1(1), pages 13-19.
    5. Lenahan O'Connell, 2008. "Exploring the Social Roots of Smart Growth Policy Adoption by Cities," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1356-1372, December.
    6. Rahel Nüssli & Christian Schmid, 2016. "Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 679-701, May.
    7. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    8. Zhixi Cecilia Zhuang, 2019. "Ethnic Entrepreneurship and Placemaking in Toronto's Ethnic Retail Neighbourhoods," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 520-537, December.
    9. Youngmee Jeon & Saehoon Kim, 2020. "Housing abandonment in shrinking cities of East Asia: Case study in Incheon, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1749-1767, June.
    10. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From the uneven de-diversification of local financial resources to planning policies: The residentialization hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1454-1472, September.
    11. Palm, Matthew & Gregor, Brian & Wang, Haizhong & McMullen, B. Starr, 2014. "The trade-offs between population density and households׳ transportation-housing costs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 160-172.
    12. Jean-Paul D. Addie & Roger Keil, 2015. "Real Existing Regionalism: The Region between Talk, Territory and Technology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 407-417, March.
    13. Garcia-López, Miquel-Àngel & Moreno-Monroy, Ana I., 2018. "Income segregation in monocentric and polycentric cities: Does urban form really matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 62-79.
    14. Verstegen, Judith A. & Goch, Katarzyna, 2022. "Pattern-oriented calibration and validation of urban growth models: Case studies of Dublin, Milan and Warsaw," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Beall, Jo, 2020. "Whither the region? Re-thinking the space and place of regions and cities in international comparative perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102507, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Roger Keil & Jean-Paul D. Addie, 2015. "‘It's Not Going to be Suburban, It's Going to be All Urban’: Assembling Post-suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 892-911, September.
    17. Cattivelli, Valentina, 2020. "Planning peri-urban areas at regional level: The experience of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna," MPRA Paper 101189, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Sofia Pagliarin, 2018. "Linking processes and patterns: Spatial planning, governance and urban sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3650-3668, December.
    19. Idt, Joel & Pellegrino, Margot, 2021. "From the ostensible objectives of public policies to the reality of changes: Local orders of densification in the urban regions of Paris and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Hussain, Zahid & Nadeem, Obaidullah, 2021. "The nexus between growth strategies of master plans and spatial dynamics of a metropolitan city: The case of Lahore, Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:4:p:775-792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.