IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v29y1992i8p1265-1276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Location of Employment in High-technology Manufacturing in Great Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Fingleton

    (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge. 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK)

Abstract

The location of employment in high-technology manufacturing in Great Britain in 1984 is analysed using a series of spatial regression models. These show that the distribution of employment explains a large part of the high-technology manufacturing employment distribution, indicating that the forces acting on high-technology location are similar to those acting on all industries. In addition, it is shown that the number of industrial establishments that migrated from each county in the previous decade is significantly positively associated with the location of high-technology manufacturing. This is interpreted as a signal that spatial variations in the level of positive feedback were also responsible for employment variations. In addition, the South West region has a higher level of employment than suggested by the above factors, and Yorkshire and Humberside and the Intermediate Areas have lower employment levels. There are four significant outliers from the final regression. An exploratory analysis suggests that three of these counties deviate because of sectoral effects involving a few high-technology subsectors, rather than being the result of local economic factors operating across the range of high-technology subsectors. London is a special case with less than the predicted level of high-technology employment, though the metropolis remained the country's major concentration of high-technology jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Fingleton, 1992. "The Location of Employment in High-technology Manufacturing in Great Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 1265-1276, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:8:p:1265-1276
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989220081261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989220081261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989220081261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    2. Kaldor, Nicholas, 1970. "The Case for Regional Policies," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 17(3), pages 337-348, November.
    3. Jim Taylor & Jim Twomey, 1988. "The Movement of Manufacturing Industry in Great Britain: An Inter-County Analysis, 1972-1981," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 228-242, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Fingleton & Danilo Camargo Igliori & Barry Moore, 2004. "Employment Growth of Small High-technology Firms and the Role of Horizontal Clustering: Evidence from Computing Services and R&D in Great Britain, 1991-2000," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 773-799, April.
    2. Bernard Fingleton, 1994. "The Location of High-technology Manufacturing in Great Britain: Changes in the Late 1980s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 47-57, February.
    3. Paul Westhead & Stephen Batstone, 1998. "Independent Technology-based Firms: The Perceived Benefits of a Science Park Location," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(12), pages 2197-2219, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andre Nassif & Carmem Aparecida Feijo & Eliane Araújo, 2016. "Structural change, catching up and falling behind in the BRICS: A comparative analysis based on trade pattern and Thirlwall’s Law," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 69(279), pages 373-421.
    2. Mark Setterfield, 2015. "Path Dependency," Working Papers 1521, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    3. Setterfield, Mark & Gouri Suresh, Shyam, 2016. "Multi-agent systems as a tool for analyzing path-dependent macrodynamics," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 25-37.
    4. Silva, Ester G. & Teixeira, Aurora A.C., 2008. "Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 273-300, December.
    5. André Nassif & Carmem Feijó & Eliane Araújo, 2015. "Structural change and economic development: is Brazil catching up or falling behind?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(5), pages 1307-1332.
    6. Fingleton Bernard & Gardiner Ben & Martin Ron & Barbieri Luca, 2023. "The impact of brexit on regional productivity in the UK," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 142-160, August.
    7. Bernard Fingleton, 1994. "The Location of High-technology Manufacturing in Great Britain: Changes in the Late 1980s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 47-57, February.
    8. Laursen, Keld, 1999. "The impact of technological opportunity on the dynamics of trade performance," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3-4), pages 341-357, December.
    9. Miguel A. León-Ledesma, 2002. "Cumulative Growth and the Catching-Up Debate From a Disequilibrium Standpoint," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: John McCombie & Maurizio Pugno & Bruno Soro (ed.), Productivity Growth and Economic Performance, chapter 8, pages 197-218, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Carton, Christine, 2007. "Un modèle de croissance cumulative étendu á l’éducation: une validation empirique pour la région asiatique [A model of cumulative growth extended to education: an empirical assessment for the Asian," MPRA Paper 20549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Sergio Parrinello, 2014. "A search for distinctive features of demand-led growth models," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(270), pages 309-342.
    12. Maria Minniti & William Bygrave, 2001. "A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Learning," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(3), pages 5-16, April.
    13. Narduzzo, Alessandro & Warglien, Massimo, 1996. "Learning from the Experience of Others: An Experiment on Information Contagion," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(1), pages 113-126.
    14. John A. Mathews, 2020. "Schumpeterian economic dynamics of greening: propagation of green eco-platforms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 929-948, September.
    15. Beomjin Choi & T. S. Raghu & Ajay Vinzé & Kevin J. Dooley, 2019. "Effectiveness of standards consortia: Social network perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 405-416, April.
    16. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    17. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    19. Pascal Petit, 2010. "Innovation and Services: On Biases and Beyond," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Georg Erber, 1994. "Verdoorn's or Okun's Law?: Employment and Growth Experiences in OECD Countries, 1960-1993," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 98, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:8:p:1265-1276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.