IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v22y2017i3p38-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using GPS Geo-tagged Social Media Data and Geodemographics to Investigate Social Differences: A Twitter Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Chappell

    (Independent Scholar)

  • Mike Tse

    (University of York, UK)

  • Minhao Zhang

    (University of York, UK)

  • Susan Moore

    (University of York, UK)

Abstract

This article outlines a new method for investigating social position through geo-tagged Twitter data, specifically through the application of the geodemographic classification system Mosaic. The method involves the identification of a given tweeter’s likely location of residence from the ‘geo-tag’ attached to their tweet. Using this high-resolution geographic information, each individual tweet is then attributed a geodemographic classification. This article shows that the specific application of geodemographics for discerning between different types of tweeters is problematic in some ways, but that the general process of classifying tweeters according to their position in geographical space is viable and represents a powerful new method for discerning the social position of tweeters. Further research is required in this area, as there is great potential in employing the mobile global positioning system data appended to digital by-product data to explore the intersections between geographical space and social position.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Chappell & Mike Tse & Minhao Zhang & Susan Moore, 2017. "Using GPS Geo-tagged Social Media Data and Geodemographics to Investigate Social Differences: A Twitter Pilot Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(3), pages 38-56, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:3:p:38-56
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780417724065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780417724065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780417724065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    2. David Beer & Roger Burrows, 2007. "Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(5), pages 67-79, September.
    3. David Beer & Mark Taylor, 2013. "The Hidden Dimensions of the Musical Field and the Potential of the New Social Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 11-21, May.
    4. Luke Sloan & Jeffrey Morgan & William Housley & Matthew Williams & Adam Edwards & Pete Burnap & Omer Rana, 2013. "Knowing the Tweeters: Deriving Sociologically Relevant Demographics from Twitter," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(3), pages 74-84, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    2. Langley, David J. & Hoeve, Maarten C. & Ortt, J. Roland & Pals, Nico & van der Vecht, Bob, 2014. "Patterns of Herding and their Occurrence in an Online Setting," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-25.
    3. Li, Xin & Xie, Qianqian & Jiang, Jiaojiao & Zhou, Yuan & Huang, Lucheng, 2019. "Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 687-705.
    4. Shu-Hsun Ho & Yu-Ling Lin & Robert Carlson Patrick, 2015. "Participant Motivations In A Social Media Community Page," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(4), pages 67-75.
    5. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    6. Ko, J. & Kwon, H.W. & Kim, H.S. & Lee, K. & Choi, M.Y., 2014. "Model for Twitter dynamics: Public attention and time series of tweeting," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 142-149.
    7. Alberto Lopez & Eva Guerra & Beatriz Gonzalez & Sergio Madero, 2020. "Consumer sentiments toward brands: the interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 203-223, December.
    8. Rajković, Borislav & Đurić, Ivan & Zarić, Vlade & Glauben, Thomas, 2021. "Gaining trust in the digital age: The potential of social media for increasing the competitiveness of small and medium enterprises," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(4).
    9. Krishen, Anjala S. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Bindu, N. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2021. "A broad overview of interactive digital marketing: A bibliometric network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 183-195.
    10. Tatiana David-Negre & Arminda Almedida-Santana & Juan M. Hernández & Sergio Moreno-Gil, 2018. "Understanding European tourists’ use of e-tourism platforms. Analysis of networks," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 131-152, December.
    11. Choi-Meng Leong & Alexa Min-Wei Loi & Steve Woon, 2022. "The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 145-157, June.
    12. Budzinski, Oliver & Gaenssle, Sophia, 2018. "The economics of social media stars: An empirical investigation of stardom, popularity, and success on YouTube," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 112, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    13. Claussen, Jörg & Engelstätter, Benjamin & Ward, Michael R., 2014. "Susceptibility and influence in social media word-of-mouth," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-129, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    15. Martin Quinn & Theodore Lynn & Stephen Jollands & Binesh Nair, 2016. "Domestic Water Charges in Ireland - Issues and Challenges Conveyed through Social Media," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3577-3591, August.
    16. P. N. Barbieri & F. Fazio & G. Gamberini, 2015. "Let Young People Join The Legislative Process. A Twitter Based Experiment On Internships," Working Papers wp995, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    17. Duan, Huijue Kelly & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A. & Codesso, Mauricio & Alzamil, Zamil, 2023. "Enhancing the government accounting information systems using social media information: An application of text mining and machine learning," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    18. Aladwani, Adel M., 2015. "Facilitators, characteristics, and impacts of Twitter use: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 15-25.
    19. Zhan Liu & Jialu Shan & Nicole Glassey Balet & Gang Fang, 2017. "Semantic social media analysis of Chinese tourists in Switzerland," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 183-202, June.
    20. Liye Ma & Baohong Sun & Sunder Kekre, 2015. "The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease—An Empirical Analysis of Customer Voice and Firm Intervention on Twitter," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 627-645, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:3:p:38-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.