IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v10y2005i2p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nice and Tidy: Translation and Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Bogusia Temple

Abstract

Across many disciplines, including sociology, anthropology, philosophy, cultural studies and sociolinguistics, writers and researchers are concerned with how language is used to construct representations of people in written and oral accounts. There is also increasing interest in cross-disciplinary approaches to language and representation in research. Within health, social care and housing research there is a rapidly growing volume of writing on, and sometimes with, people whose first language is not English. However, much empirical research in these fields remains at the level of ‘findings’ about groups of people with the issue of how they are represented remaining unexamined. In this article I discuss some of the different ways researchers have looked at issues of translation and representation across languages. As I show, some researchers have attempted to ignore or by-pass these issues in their research, some have given up the task as impossible and others have attempted the impossible. I argue that, although there can be no single ‘correct’ way for researchers to represent people who speak different languages, choices about how to do this have epistemological and ethical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogusia Temple, 2005. "Nice and Tidy: Translation and Representation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 45-54, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:2:p:45-54
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bissell, Paul & May, Carl R. & Noyce, Peter R., 2004. "From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 851-862, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas, Henry, 2015. "New technology and illness self-management: Potential relevance for resource-poor populations in Asia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 145-153.
    2. Tasneem Patel & Kanayo Umeh & Helen Poole & Ishfaq Vaja & Lisa Newson, 2021. "Cultural Identity Conflict Informs Engagement with Self-Management Behaviours for South Asian Patients Living with Type-2 Diabetes: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis of Qualitative Research Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Daku, Mark & Gibbs, Andrew & Heymann, Jody, 2012. "Representations of MDR and XDR-TB in South African newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 410-418.
    4. Johnston, Meghan E. & Herzig, Rebecca M., 2006. "The interpretation of "culture": Diverging perspectives on medical provision in rural Montana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2500-2511, November.
    5. Mifsud, Matthieu & Molines, Mathieu & Cases, Anne-Sophie & N'Goala, Gilles, 2019. "It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 307-315.
    6. Allen, Dawn & Wainwright, Megan & Hutchinson, Thomas, 2011. "'Non-compliance' as illness management: Hemodialysis patients' descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 129-134, July.
    7. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Hogan, Suellen J. & Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah, 2017. "Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-66.
    8. Mayumi Uno, 2018. "The Concepts of “Patient Suffering†and “Favorable Interaction†in Nurse-Patient Conflicts Based on Gaps in Perception," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 2(1), pages 2235-2242, January.
    9. Krisjanous, Jayne & Maude, Robyn, 2014. "Customer value co-creation within partnership models of health care: an examination of the New Zealand Midwifery Partnership Model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 230-237.
    10. Lemire, Marc & Sicotte, Claude & Paré, Guy, 2008. "Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 130-140, October.
    11. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2006. "Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: A qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2861-2873, June.
    12. Schut, Rebecca A., 2021. "Racial disparities in provider-patient communication of incidental medical findings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    13. Williams, Kevin Frank, 2007. "Re-examining 'professionalism' in pharmacy: A South African perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1285-1296, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:2:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.