IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i4p851-862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Bissell, Paul
  • May, Carl R.
  • Noyce, Peter R.

Abstract

As a framework for organising health care interactions, compliance and adherence have come in for increasing criticism in recent years. It has been suggested that interactions with patients should not be viewed simply as opportunities to reinforce instructions around treatment: rather, they should be seen as a space where the expertise of patients and health professionals can be pooled to arrive at mutually agreed goals. This concept--known as concordance--is attracting increasing interest in health services research within the UK. In this paper, we seek to empirically explore the relevance of a re-framed consultation through qualitative interviews with a small group of English speaking patients of Pakistani origin with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. We suggest that the focus of many respondents in this study on material and structural factors limiting diabetic regimen integration and the emphasis on a 'doctor-centred' model of health care interactions represent distinct problems for the accomplishment of the concordance project. However, given that some patients sought greater understanding and appreciation by health professionals of the subjective aspects of living with diabetes, if it is evaluated at the level of health care relationships, rather than health outcomes (such as improved compliance) concordance may well be a significant development for those who suggest that respect for the patients agenda is a fundamental aspect of health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Bissell, Paul & May, Carl R. & Noyce, Peter R., 2004. "From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 851-862, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:4:p:851-862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00259-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mayumi Uno, 2018. "The Concepts of “Patient Suffering†and “Favorable Interaction†in Nurse-Patient Conflicts Based on Gaps in Perception," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 2(1), pages 2235-2242, January.
    2. Bogusia Temple, 2005. "Nice and Tidy: Translation and Representation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 45-54, July.
    3. Daku, Mark & Gibbs, Andrew & Heymann, Jody, 2012. "Representations of MDR and XDR-TB in South African newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 410-418.
    4. Lucas, Henry, 2015. "New technology and illness self-management: Potential relevance for resource-poor populations in Asia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 145-153.
    5. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Hogan, Suellen J. & Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah, 2017. "Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-66.
    6. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2006. "Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: A qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2861-2873, June.
    7. Krisjanous, Jayne & Maude, Robyn, 2014. "Customer value co-creation within partnership models of health care: an examination of the New Zealand Midwifery Partnership Model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 230-237.
    8. Johnston, Meghan E. & Herzig, Rebecca M., 2006. "The interpretation of "culture": Diverging perspectives on medical provision in rural Montana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2500-2511, November.
    9. Williams, Kevin Frank, 2007. "Re-examining 'professionalism' in pharmacy: A South African perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1285-1296, March.
    10. Mifsud, Matthieu & Molines, Mathieu & Cases, Anne-Sophie & N'Goala, Gilles, 2019. "It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 307-315.
    11. Lemire, Marc & Sicotte, Claude & Paré, Guy, 2008. "Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 130-140, October.
    12. Allen, Dawn & Wainwright, Megan & Hutchinson, Thomas, 2011. "'Non-compliance' as illness management: Hemodialysis patients' descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 129-134, July.
    13. Tasneem Patel & Kanayo Umeh & Helen Poole & Ishfaq Vaja & Lisa Newson, 2021. "Cultural Identity Conflict Informs Engagement with Self-Management Behaviours for South Asian Patients Living with Type-2 Diabetes: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis of Qualitative Research Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Schut, Rebecca A., 2021. "Racial disparities in provider-patient communication of incidental medical findings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:4:p:851-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.