IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v60y2014i5p474-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The subjective experience of community treatment orders: Patients’ views and clinical correlations

Author

Listed:
  • Giles Newton-Howes
  • Doug Banks

Abstract

Background: There is little objective evidence to support the use of community treatment orders (CTOs) from randomized controlled trials. Qualitative research indicates more negative than positive responses to the use of CTOs. Nonetheless, the use of CTOs is growing internationally. There is no research to identify for whom CTOs may be a positive experience. Aim: To assess patients’ perspectives of CTOs, assessing for correlates with clinical and demographic variables. Methods: Patients currently or previously subject to a CTO were assessed quantitatively to identify their experience. Demographic data, the experience of coercion, views of detention, satisfaction with care, social functioning and psychopathology were correlated using SPSS. Results: Fifty-three per cent of patients felt that they were, on balance, better off when treated informally in the community. Patients described greater coercion and less satisfaction with care when subject to a CTO. These factors, and being in employment, identified patients whom felt harmed by CTOs 61% of the time. Conclusions: This paper highlights that more than half of patients under a CTO consider it negatively. This group is identified by patients who work, experience coercion and are unsatisfied with care. This has implications for the application of CTOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Giles Newton-Howes & Doug Banks, 2014. "The subjective experience of community treatment orders: Patients’ views and clinical correlations," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(5), pages 474-481, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:5:p:474-481
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764013498870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764013498870
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764013498870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attkisson, C. Clifford & Zwick, Rebecca, 1982. "The client satisfaction questionnaire : Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 233-237, January.
    2. Peter Tyrer & Ula Nur & Mike Crawford & Saffron Karlsen & Claire MacLean & Bharti Rao & Tony Johnson, 2005. "The Social Functioning Questionnaire: A Rapid and Robust Measure of Perceived Functioning," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 51(3), pages 265-275, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alison Schneller & Katey Thom & Peter Adams, 2018. "Towards Changing Compulsory Community Mental Health Treatment in New Zealand: Shining Light on How Community Treatment Orders Are Produced," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baronet, Anne-Marie & Gerber, Gary J., 1997. "Client satisfaction in a community crisis center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 443-453, November.
    2. Hans Arvidsson & Elisabeth Olin & Jennifer Strand & Inga Tidefors, 2014. "Effects of the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM): A one-year cluster randomized study in a group of severely mentally ill persons," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(1), pages 95-102, February.
    3. Godley, Susan Harrington & Fiedler, Elisa Mustari & Funk, Rodney R., 1998. "Consumer satisfaction of parents and their children with child/adolescent mental health services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-45, February.
    4. Angela Sweeney & Sarah Fahmy & Fiona Nolan & Nicola Morant & Zoe Fox & Brynmor Lloyd-Evans & David Osborn & Emma Burgess & Helen Gilburt & Rosemarie McCabe & Mike Slade & Sonia Johnson, 2014. "The Relationship between Therapeutic Alliance and Service User Satisfaction in Mental Health Inpatient Wards and Crisis House Alternatives: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Nor Azmaniza Azizam & Siti Noorsuriani Maon & Leny Suzana & Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Factors Influencing Selected Health Outcome among Patients Attending Universiti Teknologi MARA Medical Centre," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 500-511, July.
    6. Reema Samuel & Paul SS Russell & Tapan Kumar Paraseth & Sharmila Ernest & KS Jacob, 2016. "Development and validation of the Vellore Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale to assess functioning in people with mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(7), pages 616-626, November.
    7. Andrew Stickley & Ai Koyanagi, 2018. "Physical multimorbidity and loneliness: A population-based study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Sarah Butter & Jamie Murphy & Mark Shevlin & James Houston, 2017. "Social isolation and psychosis-like experiences: a UK general population analysis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 291-300, October.
    9. Tom Trabin & Teresa Kramer, 1997. "In the Eye of the Storm," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 342-351, June.
    10. Minna Anttila & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Jouko Katajisto & Maritta Välimäki, 2019. "Impact of a Web Program to Support the Mental Wellbeing of High School Students: A Quasi Experimental Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Colin Green & David A Richards & Jacqueline J Hill & Linda Gask & Karina Lovell & Carolyn Chew-Graham & Peter Bower & John Cape & Stephen Pilling & Ricardo Araya & David Kessler & J Martin Bland & Sim, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in UK Primary Care: Economic Evaluation of a Randomised Controlled Trial (CADET)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Helen Tyrer & Leila Ali & Faye Cooper & Paula Seivewright & Paul Bassett & Peter Tyrer, 2013. "The Schedule for Evaluating Persistent Symptoms (SEPS): A new method of recording medically unexplained symptoms," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(3), pages 281-287, May.
    13. Katherine M. Iverson & Sara B. Danitz & Stephanie K. Low & Jennifer A. Knetig & Kathryn W. Doyle & LeAnn E. Bruce, 2022. "Recovering from Intimate Partner Violence through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE): Initial Evaluation of the Clinical Effects of RISE Administered in Routine Care in the US Veterans Health Administra," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Noortje Kloos & Judith Austin & Jan-Willem ‘t Klooster & Constance Drossaert & Ernst Bohlmeijer, 2022. "Appreciating the Good Things in Life During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Evaluation of a Gratitude App," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 4001-4025, December.
    15. Margaritis, Eleftherios & Katharaki, Maria & Katharakis, George, 2012. "Exceeding parents’ expectations in Ear–Nose–Throat outpatient facilities: The development and analysis of a questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 246-255.
    16. Klara Greffin & Holger Muehlan & Neeltje van den Berg & Wolfgang Hoffmann & Oliver Ritter & Michael Oeff & Georg Schomerus & Silke Schmidt, 2021. "Setting-Sensitive Conceptualization and Assessment of Quality of Life in Telemedical Care—Study Protocol of the Tele-QoL Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Annett Lotzin & Alicia Franc de Pommereau & Isabelle Laskowsky, 2023. "Promoting Recovery from Disasters, Pandemics, and Trauma: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions to Reduce Distress in Adults, Children, and Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-48, March.
    18. Samir El Alaoui & Nils Lindefors, 2016. "Combining Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing with Clinical Outcome in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Measure Value in Treatment of Depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Helen Tyrer & Peter Tyrer & Barbara Barrett, 2013. "Influence of dependent personality status on the outcome and health service costs of health anxiety," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(3), pages 274-280, May.
    20. Field, Andy Peter Professor & Wilcox, Rand R., 2017. "Robust statistical methods: a primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers," OSF Preprints v3nz4, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:5:p:474-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.