IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i2p175-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast Serious Analogue Games in Planning: The Role of Non-Player Participants

Author

Listed:
  • Micael Sousa
  • António Pais Antunes
  • Nuno Pinto
  • Nelson Zagalo

Abstract

Objective Public participation has benefited from innovative engagement tools that facilitate the negotiation between diverse sets of stakeholders with different planning perspectives. Our objective is to test and evaluate the use of a fast Serious Game (SG) to support a participation process in the context of a conference on urban mobility. We also aim to explore how these analogue games engage Player Participants (PPs) and Non-Player Participants (NPPs). Methodology We developed an empirical approach where a fast analogue planning game was designed and deployed to support discussions during a conference on sustainable mobility. The game resulted from modding existing modern board games. We combined several game mechanisms and components with an urban map, following the Design, Play, Experience (DPE) framework for SG development. The low-tech game was available to Player Participants (PPs) and displayed in a way Non-Playing Participants (NPPs) could participate indirectly. Results The proposed SG engaged PPs and NPPs. PPs immediately started to plan the local transport system establishing a collaborative dynamic. NPPs participated by helping PPs, providing them with their expert and local knowledge. The simplicity of the game and the way it was displayed contributed to the engagement of PPs and NPPs. Conclusion Our findings show that layout configurations and facilitation techniques with analogue games can foster the participation of PPs and NPPs. Low-tech analogue SGs can be useful when resources are low, SG experience is reduced, and fast solutions for citizen and stakeholder engagement are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Micael Sousa & António Pais Antunes & Nuno Pinto & Nelson Zagalo, 2022. "Fast Serious Analogue Games in Planning: The Role of Non-Player Participants," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(2), pages 175-193, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:175-193
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781211073645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781211073645
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781211073645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    2. Lasse Berntzen & Marius Rohde Johannessen, 2016. "The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: J. Ramon Gil-Garcia & Theresa A. Pardo & Taewoo Nam (ed.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edition 1, pages 299-314, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    2. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Rafał Kaźmierczak & Monika Myszkowska, 2021. "Virtual Reality as a Tool for Public Consultations in Spatial Planning and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Inés Aquilué & Angélica Caicedo & Joan Moreno & Miquel Estrada & Laia Pagès, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Living Labs on Urban Design: The Case of the Furnish Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Lim Seng BOON & Jalaluddin Abdul MALEK & Mohd Yusof HUSSAIN & Zurinah TAHIR, 2020. "Understanding the trends and characteristics of smart urbanism across continents," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 4(1), pages 23-35, March.
    5. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Mathias Lanezki & Catharina Siemer & Steffen Wehkamp, 2020. "“Changing the Game—Neighbourhood”: An Energy Transition Board Game, Developed in a Co-Design Process: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Cezary Orłowski & Piotr Cofta & Aleksander Orlowski, 2022. "The Rule-Based Model of Negentropy for Increasing the Energy Efficiency of the City’s Digital Transformation Processes into a Smart City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Tiago de Melo CARTAXO & Johana M. CASTILLA & Marcin DYMET & Kamrul HOSSAIN, 2021. "Digitalization and smartening sustainable city development: an investigation from the high north European cities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 5(1), pages 83-101, February.
    10. Ali Termos & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2022. "Urbanism and Geographic Crises: A Micro-Simulation Lens on Beirut," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 87-100.
    11. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Sam Preston & Muhammad Usman Mazhar & Richard Bull, 2020. "Citizen Engagement for Co-Creating Low Carbon Smart Cities: Practical Lessons from Nottingham City Council in the UK," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Kenny, Daniel C. & Bakhanova, Elena & Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Voinov, Alexey, 2022. "Participatory modelling and systems intelligence: A systems-based and transdisciplinary partnership," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2022. "Evaluation of Citizen–Student Cooperative Urban Planning and Design Experience in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Anthony Simonofski & Benoît Vanderose & Antoine Clarinval & Monique Snoeck, 2018. "The Impact of User Participation Methods on E-Government Projects: The Case of La Louvière, Belgium," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 175-186.
    16. Battulga Buyannemekh & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Carissa J Champlin & Johannes Flacke & Geert PMR Dewulf, 2022. "A game co-design method to elicit knowledge for the contextualization of spatial models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    18. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    19. Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    20. Wijitbusaba Marome & Boonanan Natakun & Diane Archer, 2021. "Examining the Use of Serious Games for Enhancing Community Resilience to Climate Risks in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:175-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.