IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2297-d1047662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Kavouras

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emmanuel Sardis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eftychios Protopapadakis

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ioannis Rallis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anastasios Doulamis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nikolaos Doulamis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Targeted nature-based small-scale interventions is an approach commonly adopted by urban developers. The public acceptance of their implementation could be improved by participation, emphasizing residents or shopkeepers located close to the areas of interest. In this work, we propose a methodology that combines 3D technology, based on open data sources, user-generated content, 3D software and game engines for both minimizing the time and cost of the whole planning process and enhancing citizen participation. The proposed schemes are demonstrated in Piraeus (Greece) and Gladsaxe (Denmark). The core findings can be summarized as follows: (a) the time and cost are minimized by using online databases, (b) the gamification of the planning process enhances the decision making process and (c) the interactivity provided by the game engine inspired the participation of non-experts in the planning process (co-creation and co-evaluation), which decentralizes and democratizes the final planning solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2297-:d:1047662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgio Caprari & Giordana Castelli & Marco Montuori & Marialucia Camardelli & Roberto Malvezzi, 2022. "Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Fabian Dembski & Uwe Wössner & Mike Letzgus & Michael Ruddat & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Mario Wolf & Heinrich Söbke & Florian Wehking, 2020. "Mixed Reality Media-Enabled Public Participation in Urban Planning," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Philipp A. Rauschnabel (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 125-138, Springer.
    5. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia Avila-Garzon & Jorge Bacca-Acosta, 2024. "Thirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casey R. Corrado & Suzanne M. DeLong & Emily G. Holt & Edward Y. Hua & Andreas Tolk, 2022. "Combining Green Metrics and Digital Twins for Sustainability Planning and Governance of Smart Buildings and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Batel Yossef Ravid & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2023. "The Social Digital Twin:The Social Turn in the Field of Smart CitiesÂ," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1455-1470, July.
    3. Giorgio Caprari & Giordana Castelli & Marco Montuori & Marialucia Camardelli & Roberto Malvezzi, 2022. "Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Matthew Callcut & Jean-Paul Cerceau Agliozzo & Liz Varga & Lauren McMillan, 2021. "Digital Twins in Civil Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    5. Ekaterina V. Orlova, 2022. "Design Technology and AI-Based Decision Making Model for Digital Twin Engineering," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Ahmed Ehab & Tim Heath, 2023. "Exploring Immersive Co-Design: Comparing Human Interaction in Real and Virtual Elevated Urban Spaces in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    8. Vittorio Astarita & Giuseppe Guido & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas, 2024. "Risk Reduction in Transportation Systems: The Role of Digital Twins According to a Bibliometric-Based Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Rebekka Volk & Mihir Rambhia & Elias Naber & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Joe F. Bozeman & Shauhrat S. Chopra & Philip James & Sajjad Muhammad & Hua Cai & Kangkang Tong & Maya Carrasquillo & Harold Rickenbacker & Destenie Nock & Weslynne Ashton & Oliver Heidrich & Sybil Der, 2023. "Three research priorities for just and sustainable urban systems: Now is the time to refocus," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 382-394, April.
    11. Issam A. R. Moghrabi & Sameer Ahmad Bhat & Piotr Szczuko & Rawan A. AlKhaled & Muneer Ahmad Dar, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Its Influence on Sustainable Manufacturing and Business Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-35, February.
    12. Aravindi Samarakkody & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Enhancing Disaster Resilience in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Urban Scholar’s Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Ali Termos & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2022. "Urbanism and Geographic Crises: A Micro-Simulation Lens on Beirut," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 87-100.
    14. Konstantin A. Semyachkov, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Smart City Initiatives on the Development of Urbanized Territories," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 21(1), pages 101-129.
    15. David Adade & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Digital Twin for Active Stakeholder Participation in Land-Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Jieyin Lyu & Shouqin Zhou & Jingang Liu & Bingchun Jiang, 2023. "Intelligent-Technology-Empowered Active Emergency Command Strategy for Urban Hazardous Chemical Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Fernando Almeida, 2023. "Prospects of Cybersecurity in Smart Cities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Suhono H. Supangkat & Rohullah Ragajaya & Agustinus Bambang Setyadji, 2023. "Implementation of Digital Geotwin-Based Mobile Crowdsensing to Support Monitoring System in Smart City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Andreas Tolk & Jennifer A. Richkus & F. LeRon Shults & Wesley J. Wildman, 2023. "Computational Decision Support for Socio-Technical Awareness of Land-Use Planning under Complexity—A Dam Resilience Planning Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Maria Spyridoula Tzima & Athos Agapiou & Vasiliki Lysandrou & Georgios Artopoulos & Paris Fokaides & Charalambos Chrysostomou, 2023. "An Application of Machine Learning Algorithms by Synergetic Use of SAR and Optical Data for Monitoring Historic Clusters in Cypriot Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2297-:d:1047662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.