IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i3p2158244019876318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice, Voice, and Coproduction in Intermediate Care: Exploring Geriatric Patients’ and Their Relatives’ Perspectives on Patient Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Aimée Hartford Kvæl
  • Jonas Debesay
  • Asta Bye
  • Anne Langaas
  • Astrid Bergland

Abstract

Geriatric patients in intermediate care (IC) often do not feel involved in their rehabilitation process. We conducted interviews with 15 patients and 12 relatives to explore their experiences and preferences regarding patient participation in IC and identify types of patient participation and their potential empowering or disempowering effect. The analysis disclosed a lack of patient choice in a predetermined IC pathway. Being deserving of help meant being sick enough and was associated with the compliant patient who fits the system. Some main additional features were the need of a rehabilitation perspective and patient engagement to enable coproduction as well as the important contribution of relatives as advocates and allies. Finally, the results show the patients’ vulnerable voice in the meeting with the experts’ views. The study will add important knowledge on how staff can contribute to the tailoring of good interventions in IC and improve the understanding of underlying structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Aimée Hartford Kvæl & Jonas Debesay & Asta Bye & Anne Langaas & Astrid Bergland, 2019. "Choice, Voice, and Coproduction in Intermediate Care: Exploring Geriatric Patients’ and Their Relatives’ Perspectives on Patient Participation," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876318
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019876318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019876318
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019876318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagrunn N Dyrstad & Kristin A Laugaland & Marianne Storm, 2015. "An observational study of older patients’ participation in hospital admission and discharge – exploring patient and next of kin perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1693-1706, June.
    2. Debesay, Jonas & Harsløf, Ivan & Rechel, Bernd & Vike, Halvard, 2014. "Dispensing emotions: Norwegian community nurses' handling of diversity in a changing organizational context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 74-80.
    3. Christopher Hood & Ruth Dixon & Derek Hawes, 2015. "A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government," Post-Print hal-01577644, HAL.
    4. Tone Alm Andreassen, 2009. "The consumerism of ‘voice’ in Norwegian health policy and its dynamics in the transformation of health services," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 117-122, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aimée Hartford Kvæl, Linda & Gautun, Heidi, 2023. "Social inequality in navigating the healthcare maze: Care trajectories from hospital to home via intermediate care for older people in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    2. Montás, Marie C. & Klasa, Katarzyna & van Ginneken, Ewout & Greer, Scott L., 2022. "Strategic purchasing and health systems resilience: Lessons from COVID-19 in selected European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 853-864.
    3. Soldatkin A. A. & Krakhmalov A. N. & Rakevich I. V. & Prudnikova N. N., 2018. "Labor Potential of the Municipal Civil Service of Saratov Region," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1094-1100:5.
    4. Lindy King & Ann Harrington & Ecushla Linedale & Elizabeth Tanner, 2018. "A mixed methods thematic review: Health‐related decision‐making by the older person," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1327-1343, April.
    5. Jens Sörensen & Erik J. Olsson, 2020. "Shadow Management: Neoliberalism and the Erosion of Democratic Legitimacy through Ombudsmen with Case Studies from Swedish Higher Education," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Leon Wansleben, 2021. "Divisions of regulatory labor, institutional closure, and structural secrecy in new regulatory states: The case of neglected liquidity risks in market‐based banking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 909-932, July.
    7. Aimée Hartford Kvæl, Linda & Gautun, Heidi, 2023. "Social inequality in navigating the healthcare maze: Care trajectories from hospital to home via intermediate care for older people in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    8. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Ingrid Nyborg & Lars J Danbolt & Marit Kirkevold, 2017. "User participation is a family matter: A multiple case study of the experiences of older, hospitalised people and their relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4353-4363, December.
    10. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Mario Coccia & Igor Benati, 2017. "What is the relation between public manager compensation and government effectiveness? An explorative analysis with public management implications," quaderni IRCrES 201701, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    12. Maria Paula Escobar & David Demeritt, 2017. "Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 169-190, February.
    13. Mette Geil Kollerup & Tine Curtis & Birgitte Schantz Laursen, 2018. "Improving posthospital medication management in a Danish municipality: A process evaluation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3603-3612, October.
    14. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Marit B Rise & Marit Solbjør & Aslak Steinsbekk, 2014. "Experiences from the implementation of a comprehensive development plan for user involvement in a mental health hospital: A qualitative case study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(4), pages 387-395, June.
    16. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:226-232 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Mads Peter Klindt, 2017. "Trade union renewal through local partnerships for skill formation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(4), pages 441-455, November.
    18. Hendrik Wagenaar & Matthew Wood, 2018. "The Precarious Politics of Public Innovation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 150-160.
    19. Christensen, Mark & Newberry, Susan & Potter, Bradley N., 2019. "Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-76.
    20. Elizabeth Dávid-Barrett & Vladimir Gligorov & Jelena Krstić, 2016. "Corruption Risk and Legitimacy in Outsourced Public Service Provision: Evidence from Serbia," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 120, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.