IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i3p2158244019876297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Hiding Behaviors and Team Creativity: The Contingent Role of Perceived Mastery Motivational Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Waseem Bari
  • Muhammad Abrar
  • Sadia Shaheen
  • Mohsin Bashir
  • Meng Fanchen

Abstract

The present study explains how different factors of knowledge hiding (e.g., evasive, playing dumb, and rationalized) influence on team creativity. Drawn on social exchange theory, the present study theorizes that factors of knowledge hiding have a negative relationship with team creativity, and absorptive capacity mediates this relationship. In addition, the perceived mastery motivational climate (PMMC) as a moderator attenuates the negative relationship between factors of knowledge hiding and team creativity. Study 1, an investigation (through the experience sampling method) from 41 participants of social media, confirms the existence of knowledge hiding practices in Pakistan. Study 2 applied a partial least squares, structural equation modeling approach on randomly selected time lag data of 282 respondents from state-owned universities of Pakistan. Results show that evasive hiding and playing dumb have a significant negative relationship with team creativity; however, rationalized hiding does not affect significantly on team creativity. The absorptive capacity also does not mediate the relationship between factors of knowledge hiding and team creativity. The PMMC attenuates the negative influence of evasive hiding and playing dumb on team creativity; however, the PMMC does not moderate the influence of rationalized hiding on team creativity. The implications and future research directions are discussed in the last section of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Waseem Bari & Muhammad Abrar & Sadia Shaheen & Mohsin Bashir & Meng Fanchen, 2019. "Knowledge Hiding Behaviors and Team Creativity: The Contingent Role of Perceived Mastery Motivational Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876297
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019876297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019876297
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019876297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    2. Pittino, Daniel & Barroso Martínez, Ascensión & Chirico, Francesco & Sanguino Galván, Ramón, 2018. "Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 312-326.
    3. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    4. Dianne P. Ford & D. Sandy Staples, 2008. "What is Knowledge Sharing from the Informer's Perspective?," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Muhammad Waseem Bari & Muhammad Abrar & Mohsin Bashir & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Meng Fanchen, 2019. "Soft Issues During Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Industry Performance, China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Based View," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    6. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yijing Wang & Changfeng Wang, 2023. "The dark side of knowledge transfer: A visual analysis using VOSviewer," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 122-139, June.
    2. Cheng-Wen Lee & Choong Leng Peng & Hsiao Chuan Chen, 2022. "Reengineering Human Resources and Entrepreneurial Learning towards Organizational Revitalization in Malaysian Travel and Tourism Companies during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Shaopeng Zhang & Xiaohong Wang, 2021. "Effect of knowledge hiding on knowledge innovative behavior of innovative team members," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6423-6442, August.
    4. Zutshi, Ambika & Creed, Andrew & Bhattacharya, Ananya & Bavik, Ali & Sohal, Amrik & Bavik, Yuen Lam, 2021. "Demystifying knowledge hiding in academic roles in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 206-221.
    5. Mohsin Bashir & Ammarah Hameed & Muhammad Waseem Bari & Raza Ullah, 2021. "The Impact of Age-Diverse Workforce on Organization Performance: Mediating Role of Job Crafting," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
    6. Pereira, Vijay & Mohiya, Mohamed, 2021. "Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 368-381.
    7. Amitabh Anand & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2020. "Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding," Post-Print hal-02870014, HAL.
    8. El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser & Dagher, Grace K. & Lythreatis, Sophie & Azakir, Mohamad, 2022. "Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahadzirah Mohamad & Asyraf Afthanorhan* & Zainudin Awang & Morliyati Mohammad, 2019. "Comparison Between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and Confirming the Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life Measurement Model," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 608-614, 03-2019.
    2. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    3. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Farhan Basheer & Jawad Iqbal & Ayesha Anwar & Hafiz Khalil Ahmad, 2018. "Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Tarba, Shlomo, 2021. "Knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing in small family farms: A stewardship view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 279-292.
    5. Ascensión Barroso & Óscar R. González-López & Ramón Sanguino & María Buenadicha-Mateos, 2018. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Largest 500 Family Firms’ Websites through PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Shahzad, Arfan & Yaqub, Rana Muhammad Shahid & Di Vaio, Assunta & Hassan, Rohail, 2021. "Antecedents of customer loyalty and performance improvement: Evidence from Pakistan's telecommunications sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Tomás M. Bañegil-Palacios & Ramón Sanguino-Galván, 2017. "Competitive Success in Responsible Regional Ecosystems: An Empirical Approach in Spain Focused on the Firms’ Relationship with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Ana María Sánchez Pérez & María del Carmen Martínez Victoria, 2021. "Learning Mathematics of Financial Operations during the COVID-19 Era: An Assessment with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Xue Wang, 2018. "The Effect Of Inbound Open Innovation On Firm Performance In Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Comparative Study Between Research Centre And Business Unit," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-35, October.
    10. Rafael Sancho-Zamora & Isidro Peña-García & Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano & Felipe Hernández-Perlines, 2021. "Moderating Effect of Proactivity on Firm Absorptive Capacity and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Firms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Maja Rožman & Polona Tominc & Borut Milfelner, 2020. "A Comparative Study Using Two SEM Techniques on Different Samples Sizes for Determining Factors of Older Employee’s Motivation and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Mohammad Jamal Khan & Firoz Khan & Saba Amin & Shankar Chelliah, 2020. "Perceived Risks, Travel Constraints, and Destination Perception: A Study on Sub-Saharan African Medical Travellers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Gonçalves, Tiago & Curado, Carla & Oliveira, Mírian, 2023. "Clarifying knowledge withholding: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Thomas Dolmark & Osama Sohaib & Ghassan Beydoun & Kai Wu, 2021. "The Effect of Individual’s Technological Belief and Usage on Their Absorptive Capacity towards Their Learning Behaviour in Learning Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Sanmugam Annamalah & Murali Raman & Govindan Marthandan & Aravindan Kalisri Logeswaran, 2020. "Embracing Technology and Propelling SMEs through Open Innovation Transformation," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 10(4), pages 95-122.
    16. Joanna Kuczewska & Tomasz Tomaszewski, 2022. "Exploring potential drivers of innovation-related activities in Poland: evidence from Polish business clusters," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 775-801, September.
    17. del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2022. "The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2016. "Entrepreneurial orientation in hotel industry: Multi-group analysis of quality certification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4714-4724.
    19. Enrico Ciavolino & Massimo Aria & Jun-Hwa Cheah & José Luis Roldán, 2022. "A tale of PLS Structural Equation Modelling: Episode I— A Bibliometrix Citation Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1323-1348, December.
    20. Maier, Erik, 2016. "Supply and demand on crowdlending platforms: connecting small and medium-sized enterprise borrowers and consumer investors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 143-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.