IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p608-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and Confirming the Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life Measurement Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mahadzirah Mohamad

    (Faculty of Economies and Management Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin , (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia)

  • Asyraf Afthanorhan*

    (Faculty of Economies and Management Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia)

  • Zainudin Awang

    (Faculty of Economies and Management Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia)

  • Morliyati Mohammad

    (Faculty of Economies and Management Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia)

Abstract

Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) is a powerful multivariate statistical analysis technique which combines both factor analysis and multiple regression analysis. It is capable of analysing the inter-relationships among latent constructs simultaneously in a model. These latent constructs are measured using certain number of items in a questionnaire. Covariance-based SEM (CB-SEM) or full SEM have become the choice for many researchers in a variety of disciplines because of their ability to evaluate complex relationships using parametric statistical approach. Researchers could also opt for Variance-based SEM (VB-SEM) or Partial Least Square-SEM (PLS-SEM) when their data failed the parametric assumptions such as multivariate normality distribution and minimum sample size. However, the approach of VB-SEM or PLS-SEM is a non-parametric instead of a parametric approach in CB-SEM. This article compared the performance of both SEM approaches using the same dataset to validate the Measurement Model for Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life (MSQoL). The findings of both analyses suggested that CB-SEM or full SEM is more appropriate to validate and confirm the MSQoL measurement model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahadzirah Mohamad & Asyraf Afthanorhan* & Zainudin Awang & Morliyati Mohammad, 2019. "Comparison Between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and Confirming the Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life Measurement Model," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 608-614, 03-2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:608-614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(3)608-614.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/03-2019/3/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    2. Lee, Lorraine & Petter, Stacie & Fayard, Dutch & Robinson, Shani, 2011. "On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 305-328.
    3. Shmueli, Galit & Ray, Soumya & Velasquez Estrada, Juan Manuel & Chatla, Suneel Babu, 2016. "The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4552-4564.
    4. John Antonakis & Samuel Bendahan & Philippe Jacquart & Rafael Lalive, 2010. "On making causal claims : A review and recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313119, HAL.
    5. Asyraf Afthanorhan & Zainudin Awang & Sharifah Fazella, 2017. "Perception of Tourism Impact and Support Tourism Development in Terengganu, Malaysia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    7. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & Muhammad Tanveer, 2022. "Green capabilities and green purchasing practices: A strategy striving towards sustainable operations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1729, May.
    2. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    3. Mohd Nor Hakimin Bin Yusoff & Fakhrul Anwar Zainol & Mohammad Ismail & Razman Hafifi Redzuan & Rooshihan Merican Abdul Rahim Merican & Muhammad Ashlyzan Razik & Asyraf Afthanorhan, 2021. "The Role of Government Financial Support Programmes, Risk-Taking Propensity, and Self-Confidence on Propensity in Business Ventures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Zhang Yu & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Muhammad Umar, 2022. "Circular economy practices and industry 4.0 technologies: A strategic move of automobile industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 796-809, March.
    5. Darmaraj Sakaria & Siti Mistima Maat & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, 2023. "Examining the Optimal Choice of SEM Statistical Software Packages for Sustainable Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Sulaiman Mohammed Khalid & Khairul Anuar Mohd Ali & Zafir Khan Mohamed Makhbul & Mohd Helmi Ali & Siti Daleela Mohd Wahid, 2021. "Exploring the Effects of a Modified Higher Education Performance Service Quality Model on Organisational Sustainability: The Case of Malaysian Polytechnics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Garg, Poonam & Gupta, Bhumika & Chauhan, Ajay Kumar & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin, 2021. "Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-Hwa Cheah & Hiram Ting & T. Ramayah & Mumtaz Ali Memon & Tat-Huei Cham & Enrico Ciavolino, 2019. "A comparison of five reflective–formative estimation approaches: reconsideration and recommendations for tourism research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1421-1458, May.
    2. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    3. Christian Nitzl & Wynne W. Chin, 2017. "The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    4. María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Ana María Sánchez Pérez & María del Carmen Martínez Victoria, 2021. "Learning Mathematics of Financial Operations during the COVID-19 Era: An Assessment with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Jörg Henseler, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-8, January.
    6. Amiruddin & Fiskia Rera Baharuddin & Takbir & Wirawan Setialaksana, 2023. "May student-centered principles affect active learning and its counterpart? An empirical study of Indonesian curriculum implementation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    7. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "Effects of management control mechanisms: towards a more comprehensive analysis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 185-219, February.
    8. Hair, Joseph F. & Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Moisescu, Ovidiu I. & Radomir, Lăcrămioara & Sarstedt, Marko & Vaithilingam, Santha & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    9. Joseph F. Hair & Christian M. Ringle & Siegfried P. Gudergan & Andreas Fischer & Christian Nitzl & Con Menictas, 2019. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 115-142, April.
    10. Schlittgen, Rainer & Ringle, Christian M. & Sarstedt, Marko & Becker, Jan-Michael, 2016. "Segmentation of PLS path models by iterative reweighted regressions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4583-4592.
    11. Necmi Kemal Avkiran, 2018. "An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 401-408, September.
    12. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Mandler, Timo & Sezen, Burcu & Chen, Jieke & Özsomer, Ayşegül, 2021. "Performance consequences of marketing standardization/adaptation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 416-435.
    16. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    17. Shahzad, Arfan & Yaqub, Rana Muhammad Shahid & Di Vaio, Assunta & Hassan, Rohail, 2021. "Antecedents of customer loyalty and performance improvement: Evidence from Pakistan's telecommunications sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Evermann, Joerg & Tate, Mary, 2016. "Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4565-4582.
    19. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Tomás M. Bañegil-Palacios & Ramón Sanguino-Galván, 2017. "Competitive Success in Responsible Regional Ecosystems: An Empirical Approach in Spain Focused on the Firms’ Relationship with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:608-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.