IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i3p444-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving operational reliability of manufacturing systems by process optimization via survival signatures

Author

Listed:
  • Liling Ge
  • Yingjie Zhang

Abstract

Considering that a mechanical part or component can be produced by varying process plans for specific manufacturing requirements, process optimization can be performed for some objectives, such as production quality, cost, and system reliability. The survival signature, as a reliability equivalence factor, is recently introduced to evaluate the performance reliability of a system. In this article, a survival signature–based process optimization approach is proposed to improve the operational reliability of the manufacturing process. First, a three-dimensional part model is analyzed for the identification of machining features, and the corresponding process strategies are made for creating them. Based on the feature process strategies and the current manufacturing resources, multi-process plans could be generated and a network is constructed, which illustrates the varying operation paths. Then the reliability distribution functions of the machines on the network are estimated by the failure data. Finally, the survival signatures of the network are computed and applied to measure the failure probabilities of all operation paths so that the optimal one could be selected. The feasibility and efficiency of the proposed approach have been demonstrated by a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Liling Ge & Yingjie Zhang, 2019. "Improving operational reliability of manufacturing systems by process optimization via survival signatures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 444-454, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:444-454
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18799942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18799942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18799942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J-C Tsou & J-M Chen, 2005. "Dynamic model for a defective production system with Poka-Yoke," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 799-803, July.
    2. J. A. Buzacott & David D. Yao, 1986. "Flexible Manufacturing Systems: A Review of Analytical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 890-905, July.
    3. Tsarouhas, Panagiotis H., 2009. "Classification and calculation of primary failure modes in bread production line," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 551-557.
    4. Subhash Kochar & Hari Mukerjee & Francisco J. Samaniego, 1999. "The “signature” of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(5), pages 507-523, August.
    5. Francisco J. Samaniego, 2007. "System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71797-5, September.
    6. Saul Blumenthal & J. Arthur Greenwood & Leon H. Herbach, 1984. "Series Systems and Reliability Demonstration Tests," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 641-648, June.
    7. Seyed M.R. Iravani & Izak Duenyas & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2000. "A Production/Inventory System Subject to Failure with Limited Repair Capacity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 951-964, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiyong Ding & Rui Fang & Peng Zhao, 2017. "Relative Aging of Coherent Systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 345-354, June.
    2. Jia, Xujie & Shen, Jingyuan & Xu, Fanqi & Ma, Ruihong & Song, Xueying, 2019. "Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 435-444.
    3. Ioannis S. Triantafyllou, 2022. "Signature-Based Analysis of the Weighted- r -within-Consecutive- k -out-of- n : F Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Jingwen Lu & He Yi & Xiang Li & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2023. "Joint Reliability of Two Consecutive-(1, l) or (2, k)-out-of-(2, n): F Type Systems and Its Application in Smart Street Light Deployment," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2014. "A new look at dynamic behavior of binary coherent system from a state-level perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 115-125, January.
    6. Burkschat, M. & Samaniego, F.J., 2018. "Dynamic IFR concepts for coherent systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Roy Cerqueti, 2022. "A new concept of reliability system and applications in finance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 45-64, May.
    8. M. Kelkin Nama & M. Asadi, 2014. "Stochastic Properties of Components in a Used Coherent System," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 675-691, September.
    9. Markos V. Koutras & Ioannis S. Triantafyllou & Serkan Eryilmaz, 2016. "Stochastic Comparisons Between Lifetimes of Reliability Systems with Exchangeable Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1081-1095, December.
    10. A. Toomaj & M. Doostparast, 2016. "On the Kullback Leibler information for mixed systems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 2458-2465, July.
    11. Yi, He & Cui, Lirong & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy, 2021. "Computation of survival signatures for multi-state consecutive-k systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    12. Yandan Yang & Hon Keung Tony Ng & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2019. "Expectation–maximization algorithm for system-based lifetime data with unknown system structure," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(1), pages 69-98, March.
    13. Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Hon Ng & Jorge Navarro, 2011. "Exact nonparametric inference for component lifetime distribution based on lifetime data from systems with known signatures," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 741-752.
    14. He Yi & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Lirong Cui, 2022. "On Dependent Multi-State Semi-Coherent Systems Based on Multi-State Joint Signature," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1717-1734, September.
    15. He Yi & Lirong Cui, 2018. "A new computation method for signature: Markov process method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 410-426, August.
    16. Mahdi Tavangar, 2014. "Some comparisons of residual life of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 549-556, October.
    17. Tacquard, Claudine & Martineau, Patrick, 2001. "Automatic notation of the physical structure of a flexible manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 279-292, December.
    18. Erhard Cramer & Jorge Navarro, 2015. "Progressive Type‐II censoring and coherent systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(6), pages 512-530, September.
    19. Gaofeng Da & Lvyu Xia & Taizhong Hu, 2014. "On Computing Signatures of k-out-of-n Systems Consisting of Modules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 223-233, March.
    20. Feng, Geng & Patelli, Edoardo & Beer, Michael & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2016. "Imprecise system reliability and component importance based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 116-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:444-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.