IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v36y2021i3p224-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genesis at work: Advancing inclusive innovation through manufacturing extension

Author

Listed:
  • Nichola Lowe

    (563103University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA)

  • Greg Schrock

    (6685Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA)

  • Ranita Jain
  • Maureen Conway

    (139045The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, USA)

Abstract

US manufacturing is struggling with both a productivity and job quality challenge. These challenges are interconnected, reinforcing the need for increased coordination of economic and workforce development efforts. This article outlines the evaluation findings of a novel business-facing initiative called the Genesis Movement, to understand its role in reshaping the workforce experience within small- and medium-sized manufacturing businesses in Chicago, Illinois. Spearheaded in 2014 by the Illinois Manufacturing Excellence Center (IMEC), Genesis starts with the premise that workforce practices are central to business operations, productivity, and competitiveness—and therefore, manufacturing extension services need to promote improvements to job quality in support of long-term business success. This integrated approach represents a form of “inclusive innovation,†expanding the capacities of firms and workers to adapt in a competitive environment where pressures to maintain high quality while reducing costs are ever-present. Firms that participate in Genesis learn to adopt an inclusive organizational culture, using front-line worker engagement, skills training, and job quality improvements to drive performance and process innovation. As such, Genesis offers transferable lessons that could be leveraged by other manufacturing-supporting organizations to benefit their industry clients and the workers they employ.

Suggested Citation

  • Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Ranita Jain & Maureen Conway, 2021. "Genesis at work: Advancing inclusive innovation through manufacturing extension," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 224-241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:3:p:224-241
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942211029518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942211029518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942211029518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan N. Houseman & Brad J. Hershbein, 2018. "Understanding the Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment," Upjohn Working Papers 18-287, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    2. Alan B. Krueger, 1993. "How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984–1989," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 33-60.
    3. Jae Song & David J Price & Fatih Guvenen & Nicholas Bloom & Till von Wachter, 2019. "Firming Up Inequality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(1), pages 1-50.
    4. Lisa M. Lynch & Sandra E. Black, 1998. "Beyond the Incidence of Employer-Provided Training," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 52(1), pages 64-81, October.
    5. Jennifer Clark, 2014. "Manufacturing by design: the rise of regional intermediaries and the re-emergence of collective action," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(3), pages 433-448.
    6. Berger, Suzanne with the MIT Task Force on Production in the Innovation Economy, 2013. "Making in America: From Innovation to Market," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019914, December.
    7. David R. Howell & Susan S. Wieler, 1998. "Skill-Biased Demand Shifts and the Wage Collapse in the United States: A Critical Perspective," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 343-366, Summer.
    8. Karl Aiginger & Dani Rodrik, 2020. "Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 189-207, June.
    9. David Card & John E. DiNardo, 2002. "Skill-Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(4), pages 733-783, October.
    10. Clifford A. Lipscomb & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira & Sanjay Arora & Andy Krause, 2018. "Evaluating the Impact of Manufacturing Extension Services on Establishment Performance," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(1), pages 29-43, February.
    11. JL Harris & P Sunley & E Evenhuis & R Martin & A Pike & R Harris, 2020. "The Covid-19 crisis and manufacturing: How should national and local industrial strategies respond?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 403-415, June.
    12. Nichola J. Lowe & Laura Wolf-Powers, 2018. "Who works in a working region? Inclusive innovation in the new manufacturing economy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 828-839, June.
    13. Eli Berman & John Bound & Zvi Griliches, 1994. "Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U. S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 109(2), pages 367-397.
    14. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore, 2001. "Contingent Chicago: Restructuring the Spaces of Temporary Labor," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 471-496, September.
    15. Philipp Brandt & Andrew Schrank & Josh Whitford, 2018. "Brokerage and Boots on the Ground: Complements or Substitutes in the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships?," Post-Print hal-03129804, HAL.
    16. Tod D. Rutherford & John Holmes, 2014. "Editor's choice Manufacturing resiliency: economic restructuring and automotive manufacturing in the Great Lakes region," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(3), pages 359-378.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cathy Yang Liu & Marc Doussard & Nichola Lowe, 2023. "Fixing Work, and Moving Beyond It," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 64-72, February.
    2. Marc Doussard & Jennifer Clark, 2021. "Inclusive innovation closing essay: Problems beyond economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 265-270, May.
    3. Greg Schrock & Nichola Lowe, 2021. "Inclusive innovation editorial: The promise of inclusive innovation," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 181-186, May.
    4. Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Matthew D. Wilson & Rumana Rabbani & Allison Forbes, 2023. "Centering Work: Integration and Diffusion of Workforce Development Within the U.S. Manufacturing Extension Network," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(4), pages 375-388, November.
    5. Mark Pendras & Adam Nolan & Ashleigh Williams, 2023. "Departures From the Norm: Innovative Planning for Inclusive Manufacturing," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 225-235.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bloom, Nicholas & Hassan, Tarek Alexander & Kalyani, Aakash & Lerner, Josh & Tahoun, Ahmed, 2021. "The diffusion of disruptive technologies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113870, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Zsófia L. Bárány, 2016. "The Minimum Wage and Inequality: The Effects of Education and Technology," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(1), pages 237-274.
    3. John Carter Braxton & Kyle F. Herkenhoff & Jonathan Rothbaum & Lawrence Schmidt, 2021. "Changing Income Risk across the US Skill Distribution: Evidence from a Generalized Kalman Filter," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 55, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4jgjdlef848r49dq2dv8go26r7 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nico Voigtlaender, 2009. "Many Sectors Meet More Skills: Intersectoral Linkages and the Skill Bias of Technology," 2009 Meeting Papers 1136, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    6. Sandra E. Black & Lisa Lynch & Anya Krivelyova, 2003. "How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate," NBER Working Papers 9569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Matthew J. Slaughter, 2002. "Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Contribute to Skill Upgrading in Developing Countries?," SCEPA working paper series. 2002-08, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    8. Stephen Machin & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Changes in Wage Inequality," CEP Reports 18, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    9. Zsofia Barany, 2016. "The Minimum Wage and Inequality: The Effects of Education and Technology," SciencePo Working papers hal-03594158, HAL.
    10. Lawrence Uren & Gabor Virag, 2005. "Wage Inequality in a Burdett-Mortensen World," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 0518, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    11. Benoit Dostie & Mathieu Trépanier, 2004. "Return to Computer Use and Organizational Practices of the firm," Cahiers de recherche 04-06, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
    12. Ariell Reshef, 2013. "Is Technological Change Biased Towards the Unskilled in Services? An Empirical Investigation," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 16(2), pages 312-331, April.
    13. Cassandra M. Guarino, 2005. "Reinterpreting the Skill-biased Technological Change Hypothesis A Study of Technology, Firm Size, and Wage Inequality in the California Hospital Industry," Working Papers WR-316, RAND Corporation.
    14. Rimler, Judit, 2003. "Ecset vagy egér. Mesterségbeli tudás és magas szintű technika [Brush or mouse. Occupational capabilities and high technology]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1095-1114.
    15. Petri Böckerman & Seppo Laaksonen & Jari Vainiomäki, 2013. "Is There Job Polarization at the Firm Level?," Working Papers 1391, Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business, Economics.
    16. Marquis, Milton H. & Trehan, Bharat & Tantivong, Wuttipan, 2014. "The wage premium puzzle and the quality of human capital," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 100-110.
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09i8hjg0kpi is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Cassandra M. Guarino, 2005. "Reinterpreting the Skill-biased Technological Change Hypothesis A Study of Technology, Firm Size, and Wage Inequality in the California Hospital Industry," Working Papers 316, RAND Corporation.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09i8hjg0kpi is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Zsofia Barany, 2011. "The minimum wage and inequality - the effects of education and technology," SciencePo Working papers hal-01069474, HAL.
    21. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09i8hjg0kpi is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Thor Berger & Carl Benedikt Frey, 2016. "Structural Transformation in the OECD: Digitalisation, Deindustrialisation and the Future of Work," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 193, OECD Publishing.
    23. Yip, Chi Man, 2010. "Can't SBTC explain the U.S. wage inequality dynamics?," MPRA Paper 31198, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    24. Macartney, Hugh & Nielsen, Eric & Rodriguez, Viviana, 2021. "Unequal worker exposure to establishment deaths," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:3:p:224-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.