IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v36y2021i2p115-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Yates

    (School of Management, 7315The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)

  • Ian Clark
  • William Rossiter

    (6122Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

This study examines two inter-connected issues: the local economic governance strategies pursued by English local authorities in the post-2007 Crisis austerity period, and the impact of these strategies on local work and employment conditions. The study draws on interview data, policy documents and statistical datasets from an analysis of two English localities to understand how local authorities responded to the economic pressures resulting from the 2007 Crisis and subsequent imposition of austerity policies. The study finds local authorities engaged in various forms of entrepreneurial and austerity urbanist policies under conditions of tight budgetary constraints, resulting in an increased role for the private sector as a vehicle to generate jobs and increase tax revenue. This process has increased the influence of private sector actors within local government, part of a longer term trend. This study presents evidence to illustrate why this scenario is problematic for improving work and employment conditions, chiefly due to an unwillingness to progressively regulate work, and a prioritising of job quantity in terms of total employment, rather than favouring the creation of sustainable, high-quality local employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Yates & Ian Clark & William Rossiter, 2021. "Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 115-132, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:2:p:115-132
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942211032507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942211032507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942211032507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy Holman, 2013. "Effective Strategy Implementation: Why Partnership Interconnectivity Matters," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 82-101, February.
    2. Brenner, Neil, 2004. "New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270064, Decembrie.
    3. John Tomaney & Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2010. "Local and Regional Development in Times of Crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 771-779, April.
    4. Alan Harding & Michael Harloe & James Rees, 2010. "Manchester's Bust Regime?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 981-991, December.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 4-30, January.
    6. Duncan Gallie & Alan Felstead & Francis Green & Hande Inanc, 2017. "The hidden face of job insecurity," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(1), pages 36-53, February.
    7. Jamie Peck, 2014. "Editor's choice Pushing austerity: state failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 17-44.
    8. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    9. Nolan, Peter & O'Donnell, Kathy, 1987. "Taming the Market Economy? A Critical Assessment of the GLC's Experiment in Restructuring for Labour: Review Article," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 251-263, September.
    10. Glyn, The Late Andrew, 2007. "Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization, and Welfare," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199226795, Decembrie.
    11. Austin M Aldag & Yunji Kim & Mildred E Warner, 2019. "Austerity urbanism or pragmatic municipalism? Local government responses to fiscal stress in New York State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1287-1305, September.
    12. David Marlow, 2019. "Local Enterprise Partnerships: Seven-year itch, or in need of a radical re-think? – Lessons from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 139-148, March.
    13. John Shutt & Joyce Liddle, 2019. "Are Combined Authorities in England strategic and fit for purpose?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 196-207, March.
    14. Harvey, David, 2007. "A Brief History of Neoliberalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283279, Decembrie.
    15. Peter Nolan, 2018. "Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 400-402, November.
    16. Nikolaus Hammer & Réka Plugor, 2019. "Disconnecting Labour? The Labour Process in the UK Fast Fashion Value Chain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(6), pages 913-928, December.
    17. David N.F. Bell & David G. Blanchflower, 2018. "Underemployment in the US and Europe," NBER Working Papers 24927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Allan Cochrane & Jamie Peck & Adam Tickell, 1996. "Manchester Plays Games: Exploring the Local Politics of Globalisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1319-1336, October.
    19. Jason Heyes & Sian Moore & Kirsty Newsome & Mark Tomlinson, 2018. "Living with uncertain work," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 420-437, November.
    20. David J Smith & Will Rossiter & Daniel McDonald-Junor, 2017. "Adaptive capability and path creation in the post-industrial city: the case of Nottingham’s biotechnology sector," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 491-508.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    2. Mark Davidson, 2020. "Extreme municipal fiscal stress and austerity? A case study of fiscal reform after Chapter 9 bankruptcy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 522-538, May.
    3. Crispian Fuller, 2022. "Austerity, teleological ‘ends’ and the timespace practices of the state organisation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 298-317, February.
    4. Matthias Bernt, 2009. "Partnerships for Demolition: The Governance of Urban Renewal in East Germany's Shrinking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 754-769, September.
    5. Bayirbag Mustafa K., 2011. "Pro-Business Local Governance and (Local) Business Associations: The Case of Gaziantep," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-39, December.
    6. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    7. Simon Pemberton & Janice Morphet, 2014. "The Rescaling of Economic Governance: Insights into the Transitional Territories of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2354-2370, August.
    8. Brian Doucet, 2013. "Variations of the Entrepreneurial City: Goals, roles and visions in Rotterdam's Kop van Zuid and the Glasgow Harbour Megaprojects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2035-2051, November.
    9. Simon Parker & Michael Harloe, 2015. "What Place For The Region? Reflections on the Regional Question and the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 361-371, March.
    10. Stephen Syrett & Marcello Bertotti, 2012. "Reconsidering Private Sector Engagement in Subnational Economic Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2310-2326, October.
    11. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2015. "Understanding employment growth in the recession: the geographic diversity of state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 359-377.
    12. Mike Hodson & Andrew McMeekin & Julie Froud & Michael Moran, 2020. "State-rescaling and re-designing the material city-region: Tensions of disruption and continuity in articulating the future of Greater Manchester," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 198-217, January.
    13. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2022. "Crowding Out Development: Fiscal Federalism after the Great Recession," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 311-329, March.
    14. Erica Russell & Ian Christie, 2021. "The Remaking of Institutions for Local Climate Governance? Towards Understanding Climate Governance in a Multi-Level UK Local Government Area: A Micro-Local Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 2: Late entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 327-363, February.
    16. Hulya Dagdeviren & Ewa Karwowski, 2022. "Impasse or mutation? Austerity and (de)financialisation of local governments in Britain [Regul(ariz)ation of fringe credit: Payday lending and the borders of global financial practice]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 685-707.
    17. Danny MacKinnon & Louise Kempton & Peter O’Brien & Emma Ormerod & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2022. "Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places [The shadow of the Pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 39-56.
    18. Özgür Sayın & Michael Hoyler & John Harrison, 2022. "Doing comparative urbanism differently: Conjunctural cities and the stress-testing of urban theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 263-280, February.
    19. Simon Dudek & Hans-Martin Zademach, 2023. "Territorial development in Bavaria between spatial justice and austere federalism: A historical-materialist policy analysis of Bavarian regional development politics and policies, 2008–2018," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 890-904, June.
    20. María Carla Rodríguez & María Cecilia Zapata, 2023. "Community-led housing: Between ‘right to the city’, ‘actually existing neoliberalism’ and post-pandemic cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 829-846, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:36:y:2021:i:2:p:115-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.