IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v10y1998i1p33-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grid-Group Theory and Political Ideology

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Coughlin
  • Charles Lockhart

Abstract

The primary purpose of this paper is to introduce an alternative, grid-group theory, to the conventional liberal-conservative continuum for understanding the structure of mass belief systems. We also examine the potential advantages of this alternative in explaining preference formation with a series of exploratory empirical comparisons of the relative strengths and weaknesses of grid-group theory and the conventional measure of political ideology. While certain data limitations make our results tentative, we conclude that political ideology retains the advantage of parsimony as the single most powerful predictor of mass attitudes across a range of social and economic issues. But grid-group theory allows us to unpack distinct social logics that are conflated in a unidimensional model. These logics not only tell us more about the bases for persons' attitudes, they offer an explanation for the shifting structure of political conflicts and coalitions. Thus grid-group theory helps us explain who holds which `core values' and why.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Coughlin & Charles Lockhart, 1998. "Grid-Group Theory and Political Ideology," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(1), pages 33-58, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:10:y:1998:i:1:p:33-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0951692898010001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692898010001002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0951692898010001002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melvin Novick & Charles Lewis, 1967. "Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Coughlin, Richard M., 1990. "The economic person in sociological context: Case studies in the mediation of self-interest," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 181-207.
    3. Zaller, John, 1991. "Information, Values, and Opinion," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(4), pages 1215-1237, December.
    4. Achen, Christopher H., 1975. "Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1218-1231, December.
    5. Smith, Rogers M., 1993. "Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(3), pages 549-566, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wayne Francis & Edward Carmines, 1993. "Making measurement errors and interpreting path coefficients: a practical perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 19-30, February.
    2. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith & Neil J. Mitchell & Kerry G. Herron, 2004. "Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the U.S. and British Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(3), pages 287-309, June.
    3. Duane Alwin, 1989. "Problems in the estimation and interpretation of the reliability of survey data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 277-331, September.
    4. Donald W. Zimmerman, 2011. "Sampling Variability and Axioms of Classical Test Theory," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(5), pages 586-615, October.
    5. Cavaillé, Charlotte & Chen, Daniel L. & Van Der Straeten, Karine, 2022. "Who Cares? Measuring Preference Intensity in a Polarized Environment," IAST Working Papers 22-130, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    6. Klaas Sijtsma, 2012. "Future of Psychometrics: Ask What Psychometrics Can Do for Psychology," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 4-20, January.
    7. Rozina Afroz & Nurul Islam & Sajedur Rahman & Nusrat Zerin Anny, 2021. "Students’ and teachers’ attitude towards online classes during Covid-19 pandemic: A study on three Bangladeshi government colleges," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 462-476, April.
    8. Robert MacCann, 2004. "Reliability as a function of the number of item options derived from the “knowledge or random guessing” model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 147-157, March.
    9. Tolu O Oyesanya & Roger L Brown & Lyn S Turkstra, 2017. "Caring for Patients with traumatic brain injury: a survey of nurses' perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1562-1574, June.
    10. Deborah Schildkraut, 2000. "American Identity and Public Opinion: How What it Means to be an American Influences Language Policy Preferences," Working Papers 48, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    11. Delshad, Ashlie B. & Raymond, Leigh & Sawicki, Vanessa & Wegener, Duane T., 2010. "Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3414-3425, July.
    12. Roderick McDonald, 1986. "Describing the elephant: Structure and function in multivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 513-534, December.
    13. Zane Spindler & Xavier Vanssay & Vincent Hildebrand, 2008. "Using Economic Freedom Indexes as Policy Indicators: An Intercontinental Example," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 195-214, September.
    14. Silvia Russo & Håkan Stattin, 2017. "Stability and Change in Youths’ Political Interest," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 643-658, June.
    15. Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin & Zihao Qin, 2020. "Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label–Informed Purchase," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    16. Walter Kristof, 1969. "Estimation of true score and error variance for tests under various equivalence assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(4), pages 489-507, December.
    17. Dheeraj Sharma, 2016. "Understanding Coefficient Alpha: Assumptions and Interpretations," Working Papers id:11088, eSocialSciences.
    18. Sharma, Dheeraj, 2016. "Understanding Coefficient Alpha: Assumptions and Interpretations," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-03-38, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    19. Walter Kristof, 1974. "Estimation of reliability and true score variance from a split of a test into three arbitrary parts," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 491-499, December.
    20. Woller, Gary M., 1996. "Business ethics, society, and Adam Smith: Some observations on the liberal business ethos," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 311-332.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:10:y:1998:i:1:p:33-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.