IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v18y1995i3p313-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What About the Bell-shaped Relationship Between Primacy and Development?

Author

Listed:
  • André Lemelin

    (INRS- Urbanisation Université du Quebéc 3465 rue Durocher Montréal Quebec CANADA H2X 2C6)

  • Mario Polèse

    (INRS- Urbanisation Université du Quebéc 3465 rue Durocher Montréal Quebec CANADA H2X 2C6)

Abstract

This paper proposes, estimates, and tests a “no-frills†static two-equation recursive model, where the size of the largest city depends on the level of development in a two-step relationship, with the total urban population intervening as an intermediate variable. The model has the following implications for primacy: (1) contrary to Richardson and Schwartz's (1988) assertion, primacy is indeed related to development, albeit indirectly, but (2) the relationship does not display the bell shape predicted by the El-Shakhs-Mera hypothesis. Instead, primacy as a function of development decreases monotonically at a decreasing rate. Research assistance was provided by Atib Salhi.

Suggested Citation

  • André Lemelin & Mario Polèse, 1995. "What About the Bell-shaped Relationship Between Primacy and Development?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 313-330, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:18:y:1995:i:3:p:313-330
    DOI: 10.1177/016001769501800303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001769501800303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001769501800303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mera, Koichi, 1973. "On the Urban Agglomeration and Economic Efficiency," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(2), pages 309-324, January.
    2. Alperovich, Gershon, 1992. "Economic Development and Population Concentration," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 63-74, October.
    3. Mutlu, Servet, 1989. "Urban Concentration and Primacy Revisited: An Analysis and Some Policy Conclusions," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(3), pages 611-639, April.
    4. Parr, John B., 1985. "A note on the size distribution of cities over time," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 199-212, September.
    5. De Cola, Lee, 1984. "Statistical Determinants of the Population of a Nation's Largest City," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(1), pages 71-98, October.
    6. William Alonso, 1980. "Five Bell Shapes In Development," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 5-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junius, Karsten, 1997. "The determinants of urban concentration," Kiel Working Papers 835, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junius, Karsten, 1997. "The determinants of urban concentration," Kiel Working Papers 835, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Farhad Dehghan & Guillermo Vargas Uribe, 1999. "Analysing Mexican Population Concentration: A Model with Empirical Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(8), pages 1269-1281, July.
    3. Robert M Anthony & Kristopher K Robison, 2018. "Forced urbanisation: A cross-national assessment of the effects of intranational political violence on a nation’s largest cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2923-2945, October.
    4. Shaul Krakover, 1998. "Testing the Turning-point Hypothesis in City-size Distribution: The Israeli Situation Re-examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(12), pages 2183-2196, December.
    5. Pholo Bala, Alain, 2009. "Urban concentration and economic growth: checking for specific regional effects," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2009038, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Ronald L. Moomaw & Mohammed A. Alwosabi, 2004. "An empirical analysis of competing explanations of urban primacy evidence from Asia and the Americas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 38(1), pages 149-171, March.
    7. George C. Petrakos, 1992. "Urban Concentration and Agglomeration Economies: Re-examining the Relationship," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 1219-1229, December.
    8. Tabuchi, Takatoshi & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2002. "Taste heterogeneity, labor mobility and economic geography," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 155-177, October.
    9. Gershon Alperovich, 1993. "An Explanatory Model of City-size Distribution: Evidence from Cross-country Data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(9), pages 1591-1601, November.
    10. Karayalcin, Cem & Ulubasoglu, Mehmet Ali, 2009. "Romes without empires: urban concentration, political competition, and economic growth," Working Papers eco_2009_18, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    11. Karayalcin, Cem & Ulubaşoğlu, Mehmet Ali, 2020. "Romes without empires: Urban concentration, political competition, and economic development," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Davis, James C. & Henderson, J. Vernon, 2003. "Evidence on the political economy of the urbanization process," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 98-125, January.
    13. Rey, Sergio, 2015. "Bells in Space: The Spatial Dynamics of US Interpersonal and Interregional Income Inequality," MPRA Paper 69482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Zhang, Bingqi & Nozawa, Wataru & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Spatial inequality of inclusive wealth in China and Japan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 164-179.
    15. Ayse Gedik, 2003. "Differential Urbanization in Turkey: 1955-2000," ERSA conference papers ersa03p335, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    17. Clémentine Cottineau, 2022. "What do analyses of city size distributions have in common?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1439-1463, March.
    18. Duranton, Gilles, 2002. "City size distributions as a consequence of the growth process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20065, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Hikaru Ogawa, 1998. "Preference for Product Variety and City Size," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 45-51, January.
    20. George, Justine, 2016. "An Assessment of Inclusiveness in the Urban Agglomeration of Kochi City: The need for a change in approach of urban planning," MPRA Paper 90149, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:18:y:1995:i:3:p:313-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.