IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v36y2009i5p772-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning about Urban Mobility: Experiences with a Multiagent-System Model

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Occelli

    (Istituto di Ricerche Economico Sociali del Piemonte, Via Nizza 18, 10125 Torino, Italy)

  • Luca Staricco

    (Dipartimento Interateneo Territorio, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Multiagent systems (MASs) constitute a powerful methodological platform for dealing with the decision-making process underlying individual travel behaviour. A major challenge is the implementation of a strong notion of agency, through the building of agents capable of drawing information from their environment, processing what is important, and engaging in activities. This paper explores this issue. The notion of mental worlds—that is, cognitive entities involving both syntactic and semantic components—is invoked for accounting the way in which individuals understand their environment. A MAS model (CogMob) is illustrated. It has been developed to simulate the application of a palette of cognitive strategies in urban mobility, that is, habitual behaviour : agents choose the most familiar route; learning by instruction : agents secure information about the less congested routes; reasoning : agents select the most convenient route from a set of those previously used; visioning : agents explore a novel route. CogMob has been implemented on a SWARM simulation platform and considers a fictitious urban environment. Some results of its application to simulate the use of the proposed cognitive strategies are compared and discussed briefly. Three (not unexpected) key findings emerged: (1) there is no single most effective strategy, (2) agents can modify their strategies to adapt to changing travel conditions, and (3) an agent's personality matters when the need to modify a strategy arises. It is submitted that these aspects may be of substantial importance in the drafting of transport policies. For example, they suggest that tailoring policies according to the personalities of agents can improve the effectiveness of certain mobility measures. They also indicate that adaptation of an agent's behaviour involves both syntactic and semantic components. Thus, greater attention should be paid to information-sensitive policy measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Occelli & Luca Staricco, 2009. "Learning about Urban Mobility: Experiences with a Multiagent-System Model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(5), pages 772-786, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:36:y:2009:i:5:p:772-786
    DOI: 10.1068/b34145t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b34145t
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b34145t?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Kane & Romano Del Mistro, 2003. "Changes in transport planning policy: Changes in transport planning methodology?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 113-131, May.
    2. Salomon, Ilan & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 1998. "What Happens When Mobility-Inclined Market Segments Face Accessibility-Enhancing Policies?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2x75525j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Sangho Choo & Gustavo Collantes & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2005. "Wanting to travel, more or less: Exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 135-164, March.
    4. Brenner, Thomas, 2006. "Agent Learning Representation: Advice on Modelling Economic Learning," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 18, pages 895-947, Elsevier.
    5. T. Arentze & H. Timmermans, 2005. "Representing mental maps and cognitive learning in micro-simulation models of activity-travel choice dynamics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 321-340, July.
    6. Doina Olaru & Brett Smith, 2005. "Modelling behavioural rules for daily activity scheduling using fuzzy logic," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 423-441, July.
    7. Sean Doherty, 2006. "Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 517-536, November.
    8. David Charypar & Kai Nagel, 2005. "Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 369-397, July.
    9. Donald G. Janelle & David C. Hodge, 2000. "Information, Place, Cyberspace, and Accessibility," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Donald G. Janelle & David C. Hodge (ed.), Information, Place, and Cyberspace, chapter 1, pages 3-11, Springer.
    10. Helen Couclelis, 2000. "From Sustainable Transportation to Sustainable Accessibility: Can We Avoid a New Tragedy of the Commons?," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Donald G. Janelle & David C. Hodge (ed.), Information, Place, and Cyberspace, chapter 20, pages 341-356, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee-Gosselin, Martin & Miranda-Moreno, Luis F., 2009. "What is different about urban activities of those with access to ICTs? Some early evidence from Québec, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 104-114.
    2. Bayarma Alexander & Christa Hubers & Tim Schwanen & Martin Dijst & Dick Ettema, 2011. "Anything, Anywhere, Anytime? Developing Indicators to Assess the Spatial and Temporal Fragmentation of Activities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(4), pages 678-705, August.
    3. Calderwood, Eric & Freathy, Paul, 2014. "Consumer mobility in the Scottish isles: The impact of internet adoption upon retail travel patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 192-203.
    4. Collantes, Gustavo O. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2007. "Subjective assessments of personal mobility: What makes the difference between a little and a lot?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 181-192, May.
    5. Alexander, Bayarma & Ettema, Dick & Dijst, Martin, 2010. "Fragmentation of work activity as a multi-dimensional construct and its association with ICT, employment and sociodemographic characteristics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 55-64.
    6. Ben-Elia, Eran & Alexander, Bayarma & Hubers, Christa & Ettema, Dick, 2014. "Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: An exploratory Path Analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 56-74.
    7. Shaw, Shih-Lung & Yu, Hongbo, 2009. "A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical–virtual space," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 141-149.
    8. Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Salomon, Ilan & Handy, Susan L, 2004. "A Taxonomy of Leisure Activities: The Role of ICT," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0nk475qx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Bayarma Alexander & Martin Dijst, 2012. "Professional workers @ work: importance of work activities for electronic and face-to-face communications in the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 919-940, September.
    10. Hjorthol, Randi & Gripsrud, Mattias, 2009. "Home as a communication hub: the domestic use of ICT," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 115-123.
    11. Ory, David T, 2007. "Structural Equation Modeling of Relative Desired Travel Amounts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8mj659fp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Patricia Mokhtarian, 2004. "A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 257-284, August.
    13. Lenz, Barbara & Nobis, Claudia, 2007. "The changing allocation of activities in space and time by the use of ICT--"Fragmentation" as a new concept and empirical results," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 190-204, February.
    14. Marco Diana & Tingting Song & Knut Wittkowski, 2009. "Studying travel-related individual assessments and desires by combining hierarchically structured ordinal variables," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, March.
    15. Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2020. "Wenn die Telekommunikation den Verkehr so gut ersetzen kann, warum gibt es dann immer mehr Staus?," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Reutter, Ulrike & Holz-Rau, Christian & Albrecht, Janna & Hülz, Martina (ed.), Wechselwirkungen von Mobilität und Raumentwicklung im Kontext gesellschaftlichen Wandels, volume 14, pages 167-195, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    16. Helen Couclelis, 2009. "Rethinking Time Geography in the Information Age," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(7), pages 1556-1575, July.
    17. Maltese, Ila & Le Pira, Michela & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Evangelinos, Christos, 2021. "Grocery or @grocery: A stated preference investigation in Rome and Milan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Robert C. Kloosterman & Sako Musterd, 2001. "The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633, April.
    19. Brendan Burchell & Darja Reuschke & Mary Zhang, 2021. "Spatial and temporal segmenting of urban workplaces: The gendering of multi-locational working," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2207-2232, August.
    20. de Goei, B. & Burger, M.J. & van Oort, F.G. & Kitson, M., 2009. "Functional Polycentrism and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East UK: Evidence from Commuting Patterns, 1981-2001," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-038-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:36:y:2009:i:5:p:772-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.