IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v19y2008i6p819-830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Multi-Level Governance on Energy Performance in the Current Dutch Housing Stock

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Hoppe
  • Kris Lulofs

Abstract

The housing sector is responsible for 33% of total CO 2 emissions in the Netherlands. As such, large reductions in CO 2 emissions can be gained by increasing the energy performance in the existing housing stock. Yet, several barriers make this difficult. Renovation investments and maintenance costs are high while badly needed norms for energy improvement are absent. Furthermore, market developments and sectoral policies reflect a complex institutional environment in which many actors are interdependent, but also lack an individual sense of urgency regarding energy consumption. In this article, we try to determine how multi-level governance in Dutch housing affects the outcomes of policies aimed at CO 2 -reduction in the existing housing stock. We examined two housing sectors in the Netherlands: social housing and owner occupancy. We focus on policy implementation problems in the early 2000s. It turns out that the complex multilevel environment severely impedes the realization of ambitious policy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Hoppe & Kris Lulofs, 2008. "The Impact of Multi-Level Governance on Energy Performance in the Current Dutch Housing Stock," Energy & Environment, , vol. 19(6), pages 819-830, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:819-830
    DOI: 10.1260/095830508785363587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/095830508785363587
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/095830508785363587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Switzer, Sheldon, 2002. "Public Benefits Charges to Fund Resource Acquisition Programs: An Orwellian Tale," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 46-53, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaiser, M.J. & Pulsipher, A.G., 2003. "A generalized modeling framework for public benefit fund program valuation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 519-538.
    2. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G., 2003. "Resource allocation decision modeling for a Louisiana Public Benefit Fund program," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 639-667, November.
    3. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G. & Baumann, Robert H., 2004. "The potential economic and environmental impact of a Public Benefit Fund in Louisiana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 191-206, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:819-830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.