IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v38y2021i3p338-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dataset of Political Agreements in Internal Conflicts (PAIC)

Author

Listed:
  • Giuditta Fontana

    (Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UK)

  • Argyro Kartsonaki

    (Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UK)

  • Natascha S Neudorfer

    (Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UK)

  • Dawn Walsh

    (School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Ireland)

  • Stefan Wolff

    (Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UK)

  • Christalla Yakinthou

    (Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, UK)

Abstract

This paper introduces the new dataset of Political Agreements in Internal Conflicts (PAIC) and presents its first application. PAIC captures the institutional provisions in political agreements concluded between 1989 and 2016. It provides information on 91 variables, along five dimensions: power sharing, transitional justice, cultural institutions, territorial self-governance and international assistance. First, the paper presents the data collection and coding procedures. Then it replicates Hartzell’s and Hoddie’s (2007, Crafting Peace , The Pennsylvania State University Press) seminal study on the relationship between power sharing and negotiated agreements, showing the long-term importance of a previously overlooked realm: commissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuditta Fontana & Argyro Kartsonaki & Natascha S Neudorfer & Dawn Walsh & Stefan Wolff & Christalla Yakinthou, 2021. "The dataset of Political Agreements in Internal Conflicts (PAIC)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(3), pages 338-364, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:338-364
    DOI: 10.1177/0738894220944123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894220944123
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0738894220944123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cederman, Lars-Erik & Hug, Simon & Schã„Del, Andreas & Wucherpfennig, Julian, 2015. "Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(2), pages 354-370, May.
    2. Giandomenico Majone, 2001. "Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(1), pages 57-78, March.
    3. Cederman, Lars-Erik & Hug, Simon & Schã„Del, Andreas & Wucherpfennig, Julian, 2015. "Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?—ERRATUM," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(3), pages 635-635, August.
    4. Madhav Joshi & Jason Michael Quinn & Patrick M Regan, 2015. "Annualized implementation data on comprehensive intrastate peace accords, 1989–2012," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 52(4), pages 551-562, July.
    5. Madhav Joshi & Erik Melander & Jason Michael Quinn, 2017. "Sequencing the Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(1), pages 4-28, January.
    6. Strøm, Kaare W. & Gates, Scott & Graham, Benjamin A.T. & Strand, Håvard, 2017. "Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraint: Powersharing in the World’s States, 1975–2010," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 165-185, January.
    7. Nicholas Sambanis & Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, 2019. "Sovereignty Rupture as a Central Concept in Quantitative Measures of Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(6), pages 1542-1578, July.
    8. Elkins, Zachary & Sides, John, 2007. "Can Institutions Build Unity in Multiethnic States?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 101(4), pages 693-708, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominic Rohner, 2018. "Success Factors for Peace Treaties: A Review of Theory and Evidence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 18.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    2. Vincenzo Galasso, 2020. "Market Reactions to Quest for Decentralization and Independence: Evidence from Catalonia," CESifo Working Paper Series 8254, CESifo.
    3. Stefan Wolff & Simona Ross & Asbjorn Wee, 2020. "Subnational Governance and Conflict," World Bank Publications - Reports 34436, The World Bank Group.
    4. Tranchant Jean-Pierre, 2016. "Is Regional Autonomy a Solution to Ethnic Conflict? Some Lessons from a Dynamic Analysis," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 449-460, December.
    5. Nicholas Sambanis & Micha Germann & Andreas Schädel, 2018. "SDM: A New Data Set on Self-determination Movements with an Application to the Reputational Theory of Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(3), pages 656-686, March.
    6. Thierry Madiès & Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi & Jean-Pierre Tranchant & Cyril Trépier, 2018. "The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Martijn Huysmans & Christophe Crombez, 2020. "Making exit costly but efficient: the political economy of exit clauses and secession," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 89-110, March.
    8. Morelli, Massimo & Esteban, Joan & Flamand, Sabine & Rohner, Dominic, 2020. "A Dynamic Theory of Secessionist vs Centrist Conflict," CEPR Discussion Papers 14635, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Flamand, Sabine, 2019. "Partial decentralization as a way to prevent secessionist conflict," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 159-178.
    10. Galasso, Vincenzo, 2022. "The cost of political uncertainty: Evidence from Catalonia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 250-259.
    11. Zsuzsa Csergő & Philippe Roseberry & Stefan Wolff, 2017. "Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 491-521.
    12. Nicholas Sambanis & Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, 2019. "Sovereignty Rupture as a Central Concept in Quantitative Measures of Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(6), pages 1542-1578, July.
    13. Robert A. Blair & Nicholas Sambanis, 2020. "Forecasting Civil Wars: Theory and Structure in an Age of “Big Data†and Machine Learning," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(10), pages 1885-1915, November.
    14. Tranchant, Jean-Pierre, 2016. "Decentralisation, Regional Autonomy and Ethnic Civil Wars: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, 1950-2010," MPRA Paper 72750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Cerniglia, Floriana & Longaretti, Riccarda & Zanardi, Alberto, 2021. "How to design decentralisation to curb secessionist pressures? Top-down vs. bottom-up reforms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 377-390.
    16. Dominic Rohner, 2022. "Conflict, Civil Wars and Human Development," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 22.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    17. Lars-Erik Cederman & Manuel Vogt, 2017. "Dynamics and Logics of Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1992-2016, October.
    18. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch & Sara M. T. Polo, 2016. "Ethnic inclusion, democracy, and terrorism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 207-229, December.
    19. Martin Ottmann, 2020. "Peace for our time? Examining the effect of power-sharing on postwar rebellions," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(5), pages 617-631, September.
    20. Shteryo Nozharov, 2019. "Hybrid Threats As An Exogenous Economic Shock," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 4 Year 20, pages 21-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:338-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.