IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v32y2023i1p197-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Facilitating or Creating Barriers to Returning to Work in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Within the First 6 Months After Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Su-Erh Chiu
  • Kuei-An Cho
  • Bing-Shen Huang
  • Chien-Yu Lin
  • Ching-Fang Chung
  • Ya-Lan Chang
  • Shu-Ching Chen

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are unable to return to work after completing treatment might face financial loss and reduced self-esteem. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing a return to work in HNC cancer patients in the first 6 months after treatment. This cross-sectional study examined HNC patients who completed treatment from the outpatient radiation department of a single cancer center in northern Taiwan. Patients were assessed according to psychological distress, patient-perceived health status, barriers to returning to work, and facilitators of returning to work. Of the 106 HNC patients surveyed, 54.7% successfully returned to work. Barriers to returning to work included poor self-perception of health, greater psychological distress, and age ≥50 years. Patients who had higher psychological distress, returned to work after start of the pandemic, or received reconstruction surgery were less likely to experience a positive environment facilitating a return to work.

Suggested Citation

  • Su-Erh Chiu & Kuei-An Cho & Bing-Shen Huang & Chien-Yu Lin & Ching-Fang Chung & Ya-Lan Chang & Shu-Ching Chen, 2023. "Factors Facilitating or Creating Barriers to Returning to Work in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Within the First 6 Months After Treatment," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(1), pages 197-208, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:197-208
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738221106292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738221106292
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738221106292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn S Dewa & Lucy Trojanowski & Sietske J Tamminga & Jolie Ringash & Maurene McQuestion & Jeffrey S Hoch, 2016. "Advice about Work-Related Issues to Peers and Employers from Head and Neck Cancer Survivors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Vo Kiasuwa-mbengi Regine Levo & Renée Otter & Katrien Mortelmans & Marc Arbyn & Herman Van Oyen & Catherine Bouland & Christophe De Brouwer, 2016. "Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: Time for action-rapid review and expert consultation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/231176, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Mohanty, Aatishya & Sharma, Swati, 2022. "COVID-19 regulations, culture, and the environment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oyenubi, Adeola & Kollamparambil, Umakrishnan, 2023. "Does noncompliance with COVID-19 regulations impact the depressive symptoms of others?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Gao, Ni & Ryan, Mandy & Krucien, Nicolas & Robinson, Suzanne & Norman, Richard, 2020. "Paid work, household work, or leisure? Time allocation pathways among women following a cancer diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    3. Marcus Roller, 2022. "Pre-Crisis Determinants of Tourism Resilience," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper39, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    4. Batabyal, Sourav & McCollum, Meagan, 2023. "Should population density be used to rank social vulnerability in disaster preparedness planning?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Zhu, Jun & Ho, Kung-Cheng & Luo, Sijia & Peng, Langchuan, 2023. "Pandemic and tax avoidance: Cross-country evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Dahlberg, Marie & Bylund, Ami & Gustavsson, Petter & Calero, Teresa Herlestam & Wannheden, Carolina, 2022. "What matters to persons living with brain tumors and their informal caregivers? An interview study of qualities in interpersonal relations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Anica Zeyen & Oana Branzei, 2023. "Disabled at Work: Body-Centric Cycles of Meaning-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 767-810, July.
    8. Christine C. Ekenga & Eunsun Kwon & BoRin Kim & Sojung Park, 2020. "Long-Term Employment Outcomes among Female Cancer Survivors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Connolly, Sheelah & Russell, Helen & Henry, Edward, 2021. "Returning to employment following a diagnosis of cancer: An Irish survey," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT103, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:197-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.