IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v10y2020i3p61-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Based Management In The New Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Cozmiuc Diana

    (West University, Timi?oara, Romania)

  • Petri?or Ioan

    (West University, Timi?oara, Romania)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the updates brought by the New Economy, especially new business models brought by digitalization, on value-based management. This objective is to see if classic value-based management and the updates brought by the New Economy conflict or are somehow harmonized or complementary. Another objective is to illustrate the updates brought by digitalization as case object on Siemens as case subject. The paper is focused on value-based management particularities for digitalization products, services, solutions. The context of the paper is digitalization technology and its impact on business and society, digital transformation. The phenomenon is new to society in all and therefore both literature review and case studies are highly relevant. The article is a case study on a top European corporation, both leader in digitalization and excellent value-based management practitioner. The case study is exploratory and descriptive, searching for the connections between digitalization and value. It relies on secondary evidence about Siemens. The questions are how New Economy value patterns work in practice and how do they relate to classic value indicators, net present value of discounted cash flow or its equivalent Economic Value Added. The paper finds a connection between innovation lifecycle and investment approval or capital budgeting. The beginning of the project lifecycle involves investment in intangible assets, business models, an open network structure and is funded by venture capital. As the idea matures close to customer contract negotiation stages, the network structure turns into a project budgeted via program management and equity and debt. The findings show how so-called new capital budgeting methods, venture capital, are reconciled with classic value-based management using equity and debt and Economic Value-Added investment appraisal. Both funding methods have their logic and place in idea lifecycle at Siemens. The paper finds a match between the lean start-up method and early stages of digital offering lifecycle, and a complementarity between venture capital funding methods and equity and debt capital funding methods given by the innovation lifecycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Cozmiuc Diana & Petri?or Ioan, 2020. "Value Based Management In The New Economy," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(3), pages 61-79, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:61-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/no103/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2013. "OM Forum —Business Model Innovation for Sustainability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 537-544, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    3. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    4. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "OM Forum—New Opportunities for Operations Management Research in Sustainability," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Thomson, Linus & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Jovanovic, Marin, 2023. "Conceptualizing business model piloting: An experiential learning process for autonomous solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Oana Buliga & Christian W. Scheiner & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 647-670, August.
    7. Vishal V. Agrawal & Ioannis Bellos, 2017. "The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1545-1562, May.
    8. Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Hannu Rantanen, 2018. "Transition towards Sustainable Solutions: Product, Service, Technology, and Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Vinicius Luiz Ferraz Minatogawa & Matheus Munhoz Vieira Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Rosley Anholon & Ruy Quadros & Orlando Durán & Antonio Batocchio, 2019. "Operationalizing Business Model Innovation through Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Erica L. Plambeck, 2013. "OM Forum —Operations Management Challenges for Some “Cleantech” Firms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 527-536, October.
    11. Xue, Yu & Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Yu, Yugang, 2018. "Supporting customers to sell used goods: Profitability and environmental implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 220-232.
    12. Isaac Lemus-Aguilar & Gustavo Morales-Alonso & Andres Ramirez-Portilla & Antonio Hidalgo, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models through the Lens of Organizational Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Li-Min Chuang & Wei-Jen Chen & Cheng-Chung Yeh, 2019. "Business Model Innovation in Pharmaceutical industry: Service Orientation Perspective," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 1-7.
    14. Vishal Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Sezer Ülkü, 2021. "Leasing, Modularity, and the Circular Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6782-6802, November.
    15. Buket Avci & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2015. "Electric Vehicles with a Battery Switching Station: Adoption and Environmental Impact," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 772-794, April.
    16. Iveta Šimberová & Peter Kita, 2020. "New Business Models Based on Multiple Value Creation for the Customer: A Case Study in the Chemical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Nicholas Igbudu & Zanete Garanti & Temitope Popoola, 2018. "Enhancing Bank Loyalty through Sustainable Banking Practices: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Anton Shevchenko & Moren Lévesque & Mark Pagell, 2016. "Why Firms Delay Reaching True Sustainability," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 911-935, July.
    19. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    20. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2021. "Net-Metered Distributed Renewable Energy: A Peril for Utilities?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6716-6733, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:61-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.