IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v10y1979iautumnp695-705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divide and Conquer: Microfoundations of a Marxian Theory of Wage Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Roemer

Abstract

Microfoundations for a divide-and-conquer model of wage discrimination are provided by positing that workers' psychologies permit racial integration of firms to weaken workers' unity and hence reduce their bargaining power against employers. In this bargaining -- as opposed to competitive -- model of wage determination, there are discriminatory equilibria at which both white and black workers are worse off and employers are better off than would be the case without worker dissension. Furthermore, owing to the bargaining structure, market forces cannot unravel the discriminatory wage bargain.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Roemer, 1979. "Divide and Conquer: Microfoundations of a Marxian Theory of Wage Discrimination," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(2), pages 695-705, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:10:y:1979:i:autumn:p:695-705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%28197923%2910%3A2%3C695%3ADACMOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robin Naylor, 1994. "Pay discrimination and imperfect competition in the labor market," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 177-188, June.
    2. Nancy Folbre, 2013. "The rise and decline of patriarchal capitalism," Chapters, in: Jeannette Wicks-Lim & Robert Pollin (ed.), Capitalism on Trial, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Dasgupta, Indraneel, 2009. "'Living' wage, class conflict and ethnic strife," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 750-765, November.
    4. Sripad Motiram, 2010. "Incomplete Contracts, Incentives and Economic Power," Microeconomics Working Papers 23017, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    5. Mick Brookes & Timothy Hinks & Duncan Watson, 2001. "Comparisons in Gender Wage Differentials and Discrimination between Germany and the United Kingdom," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 15(3), pages 393-414, September.
    6. John E King, 2015. "Microfoundations and Marxism," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 652-659, December.
    7. Sripad Motiram, 2019. "Incomplete Contracts, Power and Efficiency: A Theoretical Analysis," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 7(2), pages 173-188, December.
    8. Sripad Motiram, 2010. "Incomplete contracts, incentives and economic power," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2010-011, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    9. Patrick Mason, 1992. "The divide-and-conquer and employer/ employee models of discrimination: Neoclassical competition as a familial defect," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 73-89, June.
    10. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    11. Fabien Tarrit, 2017. "Marxisme (Académique)," Post-Print hal-02019117, HAL.
    12. G. Coleman, 2002. "Contesting the Magic of the Market-place: Black Employment and Business Concentration in the Urban Context," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1793-1818, September.
    13. Skatun, John Douglas, 1998. "Divide the hours and conquer the surplus: part-time workers and pay," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 235-242, November.
    14. Robert Drago, 1986. "Capitalism and Efficiency: A Review and Appraisal of the Recent Discussion," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 18(4), pages 71-92, December.
    15. Marjorie L. Baldwin, 1997. "Can the ADA Achieve its Employment Goals?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 549(1), pages 37-52, January.
    16. Sripad Motiram, 2010. "Incomplete Contracts, Incentives and Economic Power," Working Papers id:3123, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:10:y:1979:i:autumn:p:695-705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.